Management capacity of healthcare facilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries; A scoping review

i. Communication

Ability to effectively communicate with subordinates, the community, policymakers and supervisors was an important managerial competency [17,31–36]. Key communication skills included managers’ ability to listen attentively to different actors, share ideas, remain calm in emergencies, create open pathways of communication with actors, and provide accurate information [17,31–36]. Communication was especially important in convincing the public to take up public health services and sharing facility information with the community and other stakeholders [34].

However, despite its recognized importance, numerous studies revealed substantial deficiencies in managers’ communication skills, as assessed by themselves, their supervisors, and their subordinates [32,37]. Discrepancies were notable, with self-assessment ratings often being higher than evaluations from supervisors and subordinates [37]. Managerial experience was found to influence communication competency, with those having more experience generally rating themselves higher in this regard [17]. Overall, the findings underscore the pivotal role of communication in managerial effectiveness, influencing various aspects of organizational functioning, relationship-building, and public engagement.

ii. Financial management and planning

The ability of facility managers to effectively plan, budget and advocate for more financial resources for their facility was an important managerial competency [2,11,17,31–33,35,38]. Across the studies, necessary financial management skills included budget management, financial resources mobilization, reporting, prudent purchasing of needed facility drugs and equipment, management of financial risks and financial education for staff [2,11,17,31–33,35,38]. Budget management was to be done following the existing financial legislation [17,32]. These skills were important in enabling managers to develop realistic budgets, track and report, mobilize for more financial resources, manage financial risks and strategically purchase drugs and equipment based on facility needs and local priorities [11,19,33].

However, a good portion of managers lacked these financial management skills but those with significant managerial experience considering themselves more competent. For example, the studies by AwadAllah & Salem, 2021 and Adeniran et al., 2022, reported more than 50% of the managers were not competent in creating realistic budgets, financial reporting and mobilizing for more financial resources. The lack of budgeting and reporting competencies predisposes the facility to poor accountability, transparency and inefficiencies. Notably, managers who had more than five years managerial experience perceived themselves as more competent compared to those with little or no experience [17]. This was important as they could mentor other less experienced managers to help improve their competencies.

Planning as a competency also intersected with financial management, as managers had to consider the available annual facility budget while planning for the facility [17]. Managers had to balance between the available resources and the competing priorities in their planning [17,33,39].

iii. Human resource, supportive and performance management

Another important managerial competency was the manager’s ability to train, enhance performance, and foster a conducive work environment for human resources under their supervision [2,11,14,17,18,32,33,40]. In the studies, key human resource management (HRM) skills included performance monitoring, providing feedback, supportive supervision, staff in-service training, managing absenteeism, delegating, leading, and mentoring staff [2,11,14,17,18,32,33,40].

Managers possessing these skills implemented in-service training based on their staff skill needs, provided constructive feedback, resolved conflict, proactively managed absenteeism, and mentored staff, all of which contributed to improved staff performance [19]. For instance, in Lopes et al., 2020 and Foster et al., 2017, HRM competent managers conducted ongoing in-service training, provided staff with specified job descriptions, monitored and improved staff productivity and staff retention. Managers with more managerial experience and higher level positions were more competent [39]. However, many other managers lacked these competencies. For instance, AwadAllah & Salem, 2021, reported 60.1% of managers have limited human resource management skills similar to Munyewende et al., 2016, where more than half of supervisors and subordinates reported facility managers as not competent in these skills. When managers lack these competencies, staff are less motivated, perform below average and miss out on training opportunities to improve their skills. Thus, human resource management was a critical competency for managers, enabling them to create a conducive work environment for their staff and enhance staff performance.

iv. Community and stakeholder engagement

Another important managerial competency was the manager’s ability to involve the community and stakeholders in facility activities, gain their support, and feedback and implement changes according to the received feedback [11,14,18,33,38,40]. Across the studies, skills in community and stakeholder engagement included community outreaches, gaining community trust and satisfaction, getting community feedback and implementing changes, and establishing community health committees and advisory boards [11,14,18,33,38,40]. Competent managers ensured there were functioning community health committees, health advisory boards and clinic committees [14,18,38,41]. These committees supported the involvement of the community in decision-making, strengthening community linkages and improving service delivery [14,42]. Competent managers also collected feedback from the community using different tools such as suggestion boxes and implemented changes based on this received feedback, better addressing community health needs and priorities [18,41].

The performance of the managers in this competency was still mixed. Across the board, the managers scored poorly in ensuring community members and leaders were actively involved in facility activities including meetings, committees and advisory boards [14,18,33]. The managers however performed well in listening and responding to feedback [14,33]. Responding to this feedback is important as it meant care was responsive to the community’s needs and they were empowered to take an active role in the design of health services. Community engagement was therefore an important competency for the managers, but deficiencies were prevalent.

v. Target setting, problem-solving

Another managerial competency was the ability of managers to set facility goals, objectives, and targets, and implement timely corrective actions to address encountered risks and problems [14,17,33,34,38,43]. Key skills in this competency included setting of facility mission, vision, goals, action plans, improvement targets, and accountability to a specified population [17,33,34,38,43]. These goals addressed community needs and aligned with sub-district, district, and provincial targets and priorities. Problem-solving competency was also required in identifying the root causes of problems and taking timely corrective action [2,17,32].

There were notable deficiencies in the competency of managers across studies. For example, in the study by AwadAllah & Salem, 2021, 58.7% of managers reported having low managerial competency in planning and target-setting, and 56.6% reported low competency in problem-solving. In Munyewende et al., 2016, 54.1% of supervisors and 57.3% of subordinate nurses rated managers as not competent in problem-solving. This was a threat as such managers would not effectively implement corrective action to encountered problems including those affecting service delivery. Target setting and problem-solving skills were important individual capacities but deficiencies were prevalent.

vi. Leadership

Another important managerial competency was the manager’s ability to lead and motivate staff to achieve set missions and visions, consult, and handle difficult situations [17,31–34,43]. Key areas of leadership across the studies included motivating staff, achieving missions and visions, consultation in decision-making, feedback and coaching, delegation, and dealing with difficult workplace situations [17,31–34,43]. Competent managers set clear missions and values, consult staff when making strategic decisions, and empower talented staff [31,43]. Infection risks to patients were also reduced in facilities with managers competent in leadership [17,43]. The level of competency of managers across the studies was inconsistent, with some reporting high competency levels and others reporting low competency levels. For example, Kingu et al., 2023, found 75.48% of the managers to be competent in leadership while Munyewende et al., 2016, reported that more than half of the supervisors rated facility managers as not competent in leadership. Experience was also a key determinant, as more experienced managers self-rated higher in perceived competency levels. Leadership played a key role in motivating staff to achieve set goals; however, some managers lacked proficiency in this area.

vii. Situational analysis

Also, managers’ situational awareness of the healthcare environment, its influence on the functioning of facilities, and how to implement change were important managerial competencies [2,31,32]. Across the studies, skills in situational analysis included the manager’s knowledge of the regulatory and administrative environment, the role of different healthcare professionals and healthcare activities related to their work area. It also included planning, implementing, and monitoring change [2,31,32]. Good awareness meant a better understanding of national guidelines, strategies, and policies, and how they relate to the manager’s work area. Facility managers competent in change management effectively recognized the need for change, developed, implemented, and monitored change strategies, and also managed resistance to change [31]. The competency of managers across the studies was mixed. Lopes et al., 2019, reported poor competency in knowledge of the healthcare environment, while Kingu et al., 2023, found that more than 65.68% were competent. Despite the good competency of some managers, much should be done to improve the competency of those with lower levels.

There was an interrelationship between the different competencies we found. The various competencies complemented each other, making it essential for managers to possess most of them to effectively oversee the operations of PHC facilities. For example, communication as a competency was also important in human resource management and community engagement as managers needed to effectively communicate with staff and the community.

i) Clear roles and responsibilities

Ensuring that managers are aware of their roles, responsibilities and degree of authority was another important aspect of functional support systems. Managers were expected to be conversant with their roles and responsibilities as these guided them in their work (Adeniran et al., 2022; Foster AA et al., 2017; Heerdegen ACS et al., 2020; Liu L, Desai MM, Fetene N, et al., 2022). They also needed to be aware of the extent of their authority and accountable. These roles, responsibilities and degree of authority are to be contained in the job descriptions. In the studies, this awareness and availability of job descriptions were varied. Adeniran et al., 2022 and Heerdegen et al., 2020 reported that majority of managers were provided with clear job descriptions. This was opposite to the findings of Foster et al., 2017 where managers lacked an explicit job description which augmented the difficulties they faced as they transitioned from clinical to management roles. However, even with job descriptions, managers were still tasked with additional responsibilities not within their scope (Adeniran et al., 2022). moderate/large extent. This is a concern as these managers may not have been adequately prepared and supported to carry out these additional duties. Therefore, the availability of clearly defined job descriptions is a requirement as part of institutional capacity.

ii) Availability of resources

Availability of the required resources to carry out planned facility activities was an important part of functional support systems as provided by the managing authorities [2,11]. Studies assessed whether the PHC facilities had adequate funds, logistics and infrastructure necessary for managers to carry out facility activities. For public facilities, the sub-national and national management structures were often responsible for providing these resources [2,33,44]. As integral inputs, the availability of these resources contributed to what extent planned facility activities were implemented. However, the managing authorities had not readily provided these required resources to the facilities thereby limiting the managers’ running of the facilities and service delivery. This led to challenges such as shortage of essential drugs and equipment reducing the availability, accessibility and quality of services. Inadequate and irregular financial resources was most reported across studies. In Adeniran et al., 2022, 71.8% of facility managers reported that they occasionally had adequate funds to carry out planned activities. This irregular disbursement from the national governments is also documented by Altobelli, 2024 who add that it delayed the purchasing of essential drug, supplies and equipment. The limited availability of adequate funds, logistics, and infrastructure was therefore an impediment to facility operations.

iii) Support to undertake duties

Supporting managers when they require assistance to complete their assignments was another important aspect of functional support systems [2,11]. Managers were to be supported in assignments such as human resource management, data management, procurement of drugs and other commodities, community involvement, planning, and budgeting [2,11]. This support also included supportive supervision, feedback, and mentoring from their supervisors in the higher levels of management at the sub-district and district levels [2,11,40]. Such support was important in collective problem solving and resolving issues that previously needed escalation. However, the level of this support varied across the studies. In Adeniran et al., 2022, 60.6% of managers reported occasionally receiving support in conducting planning and budgeting. Conversely, supportive supervision, feedback, and mentoring were better provided across the studies, with 89.7% of managers in Heerdegen et al., 2020 indicating ‘to a moderate/large extent,’ and 63.3% of managers in Adeniran et al., 2022 reporting ‘always.’ Thus, managers were better supported in some areas while other areas received little to no support. Nonetheless, considering that providing optimal support can create a conducive work environment for managers, it was important for managing authorities to make this available.

In summary, these three areas of institutional capacity were interrelated and interdependent. Improving one required a concurrent improvement in the others for better capacity. For instance, managers needed to not only understand their roles and responsibilities but also have access to the resources essential to effectively fulfil those duties. Similarly, they also needed management support to effectively undertake these duties.

Management capacity of PHC facilities required both individual and institutional capacities to be in place. Managerial competencies were essential for the daily operation of these facilities and the efficient use of available resources. Institutional capacity determined the availability of these resources for example via district and sub-district management teams in public PHC facilities [2,10,11,44]. Functional support systems were only useful if the needed management competencies were present. Considering this interrelatedness, strengthening either individual or institutional capacity without the other was not likely to work [2,10].