ABSTRACT
Introduction Semi-Fowler’s position, in which the trunk is elevated 30° from supine, is widely used in clinical practice to improve respiratory function and reduce cardiovascular stress. Despite known cardiovascular benefits of upper trunk flexion, its effects on ventilation remain uninvestigated.
Objective To compare ventilation volumes between semi-Fowler’s position with upper trunk flexion (UT30) and whole trunk elevation (WT30) in healthy young women.
Methods Fourteen healthy young women (age, 20.57±0.73 years; BMI, 20.19±1.46kg/m2) participated in this cross-sectional study. Ventilation parameters were measured in supine (SPIN), UT30, and WT30 positions. Tidal volume, minute ventilation, respiratory rate, RR intervals, and subjective breathing difficulty were assessed and analyzed using linear mixed models.
Results Both UT30 and WT30 showed significantly higher tidal volume and minute ventilation compared to SPIN (>80mL and >0.9L/min increases respectively, p<0.05), with no significant differences between the two semi-Fowler positions. RR intervals were significantly lower in WT30 compared to SPIN (p<0.05), with no difference between UT30 and SPIN, suggesting maintained cardiovascular stability in UT30.
Conclusion Upper trunk flexion improves ventilation volume similar to whole trunk elevation while maintaining cardiovascular stability, potentially benefiting patients requiring respiratory support with minimal hemodynamic compromise.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of International University of Health and Welfare (approval number: 21-lg-16).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
In the previous manuscript, there were some discrepancies between the description in the tables and the results section. In this manuscript, we have corrected these parts to ensure they are completely consistent. Additionally, as an ethical matter, we have added a statement that consent forms were signed with participants.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
