Abstract
Introduction AI-powered conversational agents have proven effective in alleviating psychological distress, however, concerns about autonomy and authentic psychological development remain, especially in youth during critical stages of identity and resilience formation. Despite the increasing use of AI technologies, there is a significant gap in well-being literacy within educational systems. This gap leaves young adults ill-prepared to navigate the complexities of real world challenges, contributing to rising rates of anxiety, stress, and depression. Furthermore, the lack of AI literacy can exacerbate psychological distress, negatively impacting academic performance and overall well-being. As young adults actively engage with AI, efforts should focus not on resisting technological progress but on fostering their development as users who are capable, aware, and ethical in addressing their contextual well-being needs. This study aims to extend the understanding of the factors influencing well-being and determine how to harness artificial intelligence for contextual well-being from a human-centred perspective. Methods and analysis The research is an exploratory sequential mixed methods Study, combining semi-structured interviews and an electronic Delphi study to gather insights for consensus building. The study adopts a pragmatism paradigm with a foresight approach, ideal for addressing the dynamic, evolving intersection of AI and well-being. Both reflective thematic analysis and descriptive statistical analysis will be used. Medical students (aged 18–30) were selected as a social microcosm study cohort representing youth. Ethics and dissemination This study was approved by the UCD Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC); Reference: LS-C-24-375-Xie-Cullen. The outcomes of the study will be communicated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at academic conferences.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the UCD Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) Reference:LS-C-24-375-Xie-Cullen.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
