Abstract
Background: Brain metastases (BM) are a major clinical challenge in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), affecting up to 50% of patients during disease progression. Current guidelines do not mandate brain imaging for all metastatic lung cancer patients at diagnosis unless there are neurological symptoms present. However, real-world data on the predictive value of neurological symptoms for BM detection remain scarce. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study analyzed all consecutive patients diagnosed with stage IV LUAD with molecular assessment in western Sweden from 2016-2021 (n = 912). We extracted data from patient charts, imaging referrals, radiology reports and the Swedish National Lung Cancer Registry to determine diagnostic brain imaging (DBI) frequency and modality, presence of neurological symptoms, BM detection rates, size, number, location and overall survival (OS). Results: Among stage IV LUAD patients, 63% underwent DBI, and BM was detected in 23% of all patients (37% of those receiving DBI). Neurological symptoms prompted DBI in 63% of cases, yet 58% of these symptomatic patients had no BM on imaging. Conversely, 28% of asymptomatic patients who underwent DBI had BM. Patients with BM detected in the absence of neurological symptoms had smaller metastases. Neurological symptoms were associated with worse OS, irrespective of the presence of BM. Conclusion: Neurological symptoms poorly predict BM in metastatic LUAD. Routine MRI-based brain imaging at diagnosis of metastatic disease, irrespective of neurological symptoms, may improve outcomes for this underserved patient population. These results provide real-world evidence supporting the need for reassessment of current BM screening recommendations.
Competing Interest Statement
LN has received lecturing honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Immunocore, Miltenyi Biotec, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Roche. LN has participated in advisory board meetings with Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre. LN has stocks/ownership in SATMEG Ventures. EAE has received lecturing honoraria from AstraZeneca. AH has received lecturing honoraria from AstraZeneca.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council (2018-02318 and 2022-00971 to VIS, 2021-03138 to CW), the Swedish Cancer Society (23-3062 to VIS, 22-0612FE to CW), the Gothenburg Society of Medicine (2019; 19/889991 to EAE), Assar Gabrielsson Research Foundation (to EAE, KXA, CW, and VIS), the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital (to EAE, CW, AH and VIS), the Swedish Society for Medical Research (2018; S18-034 320 to VIS), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, and the Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine (to VIS).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr 2019-04771 and 2021-04987) was obtained prior to the commencement of the study. No informed consent was required due to all data being presented in a de-identified form.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
