Using Mendelian randomization to assess long-term pleiotropic effects of potential novel triglyceride-lowering medications

Elliot Outland, Yi Xin, Alyson L. Dickson, Xue Zhong, Gul Karakoc, Sevim Kilic, Lan Jiang, Nancy J. Cox, Wei-Qi Wei, C. Michael Stein, QiPing Feng
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.07.25323588

Abstract

Background Drugs targeting triglyceride (TG)-associated genes have the potential to improve cardiovascular outcomes for patients with elevated TG levels. However, we know little regarding the potential additional benefits or deleterious effects of such targeting, particularly among individuals of African ancestry (AA). Mendelian randomization and PheWAS approaches offer the opportunity to examine such primary and secondary effects.

Methods We examined 12 variants reported previously in Mendelian randomization studies from 5 genes that have been identified as TG-lowering targets (APOA5, LPL, APOC3, ANGPTL3, and ANGPTL4); for those variants associated with measured TG levels, we tested selected phenotypes, including lipid, cardiovascular, and other potential effects reported in previous studies, using PheWAS in separate cohorts of European ancestry (EA) patients and AA patients in BioVU. We also tested unspecified other phenotypes (i.e., without previously reported associations with TGs) for additional effects. We then replicated results in All of Us (AoU). As a secondary analysis, we tested the genetically predicted expression of these TG-lowering target genes for their association with the selected phenotypes in EA BioVU patients.

Results Among BioVU EA patients (n=63,094), 11 previously reported SNPs were associated with measured TGs; of these, 9 SNPs were associated with lipid and cardiovascular phenotypes. Results were largely consistent in AoU EA participants (n=97,532). Among AA patients in BioVU (n=12,515) and AoU (n=31,710), results were more limited; only 6 of the 12 reported SNPs were associated with measured TGs in BioVU AA patients. While 4 of these validated 6 SNPs were associated with a lipid or cardiovascular phenotype in either BioVU or AoU, none were consistent across both cohorts. Additionally, we detected few secondary effects in either EA or AA BioVU patients, and none were replicated. In the secondary analysis assessing predicted gene expression, results were largely consistent with the primary analysis for EA BioVU patients.

Conclusions These results suggest that beyond cardiovascular benefits there may be limited additional benefits, but few deleterious effects, from targeting known TG-associated genes for individuals of EA. However, we found limited information supporting the efficacy or safety of these targets for mitigating cardiovascular risk among AA individuals.

BACKGROUND

Elevated triglyceride (TG) levels are associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), the leading cause of death globally.1,2 In the United States, 31% of adults have triglyceride (TG) levels ≥150 mg/dL (i.e., mildly elevated and above),2 with studies demonstrating that the risks for CHD increase 14% for men and 37% for women for each mmol (88 mg/dL) rise in TG levels.3 Indeed, targeting TG can have benefits for reducing CHD risk, even among patients already receiving standard lipid-lowering treatments (e.g., statins, fibrates, omega 3 fatty acids, and niacin).4–6

As such, identifying effective therapeutic targets associated with TG levels is an important goal for the reduction of CHD risk; however, successful targeting requires not only a decrease in TG levels, but also an associated secondary effect of improved cardiovascular outcomes. The degree to which and the mechanisms whereby TGs are associated with CHD has been the subject of debate, particularly given the potential for confounding.2 One relatively recent methodological approach has offered a means to identify the causal role of TGs in CHD more accurately—namely, Mendelian randomization (MR). MR mirrors clinical trials, but rather than random assignment, randomization is achieved through the arbitrary assignment of gene variants passed from parents to offspring; beneficially, this approach offers the ability to assess causality between exposures and outcomes while limiting unmeasured confounding, since genetic information is fixed at conception.7–12 Indeed, applying such an approach, researchers have used functional variations in genes with robust effects on TG levels (e.g., LPL, APOA5, and APOC3) to establish the causal relationship between TGs and CHD.11,13–18 These insights have spurred new drug development, targeting specific TG-associated genes for more effective CHD prevention.19 In particular, current efforts have focused on increasing lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity; both the LPL gene and genes in the LPL pathways (e.g., ANGPTL3, ANGPTL4, and APOC3) have been considered as potential drug targets.13,20–26

In addition to establishing these primary causal relationships, MR approaches can be used to identify other secondary effects of targeting TG-associated genes, including adverse effects. During the approval process, clinical trials are designed to test not just the efficacy of new treatments, but also to identify potential side effects (or lack thereof). However, not all phenotypes (effects) can be tested in clinical trials given their relatively limited power and the short periods of follow-up that can obscure long-term effects; these effects typically are only later detected by case reports and retrospective cohort studies of patients that have experienced those effects (e.g., the discovery of cardiovascular risk associated with rofecoxib27,28). MR has been deployed to detect these types of long-term effects. For example, statins are among the most extensively studied drugs in history and millions of patients take them; however, their increased risk of diabetes was only identified after statins had been on the market for 21 years, and was later confirmed by MR.8 Beneficially, MR also offers the advantage of pre-emptively detecting potential long-term effects of such therapies, particularly when deployed in conjunction with a phenome wide association study (PheWAS) approach.29 As such, MR presents researchers with the opportunity to identify other potential beneficial or deleterious effects of TG-lowering treatments under development.30 Given that TG-associated genes (particularly LPL) are implicated in numerous pathological conditions (e.g., atherosclerosis, diabetes, pancreatitis, and Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias [ADRD]),31–34 targeting such genes with TG-lowering treatments may have additional effects on these and other conditions.

Despite this promise, studies of non-CHD effects associated with either TG levels or candidate drugs for TG-lowering have remained limited and inconclusive.35 In particular, the research to date has focused almost exclusively on patients of European ancestry (EA); this narrow emphasis has potentially hindered our ability to detect effective TG-related targets and predict associated secondary effects, given that lipid profiles can vary significantly by ancestry. Notably, average triglyceride levels are lower in populations of African ancestry (AA) than those of EA,36 including the lower proportion of individuals with very high TG levels.36–42 Although genetic studies on inter-individual TG variability have begun to incorporate ancestries beyond those of EA patients,42–44 relatively little is known about the relationship between TG-associated genes and secondary effects in individuals of AA. Accordingly, it is important to determine whether associations validated among patients of EA also apply to patients of AA as well determining whether there are ancestry-specific secondary effects (either beneficial or deleterious).

As such, to better define potential benefits and risks for TG-lowering medications currently in development, we deployed MR with PheWAS to assess the potential pleiotropic effects of genetic predictors of TG levels in ancestry-specific cohorts of EA and AA patients at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), with replication among All of Us (AoU) participants. First, we validated associations between 12 genetic variants reported in previous MR studies from 5 genes identified as TG-lowering targets (i.e., APOA5, LPL, APOC3, ANGPTL3, and ANGPTL4)45,46 and measured TG levels.

Then, among the validated variants, we conducted PheWAS to assess whether these variants were associated with selected prespecified 1) lipid phenotypes, 2) cardiovascular phenotypes, and 3) other phenotypes previously associated with TGs (including diabetes, pancreatitis, and ADRD), as well as 4) unspecified other phenotypes (i.e., without previously reported associations with TGs). As a secondary analysis in EA patients, we tested the associations between the prespecified phenotypes and the predicted expression of the 5 TG-associated genes.

METHODS

The primary analysis was conducted in cohorts of EA and AA patients from BioVU, a biobank at VUMC. BioVU offers genome-wide genotyping data for ∼90,000 patients on the Illumina Infinium Expanded Multi-Ethnic Genotyping Array plus custom content platform (MEGA), which are linked to de-identified copies of the patients’ electronic health records (EHRs). These EHRs include demographics, clinical notes, lab results, medications, and diagnostic and procedure codes (e.g., International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] codes and Tenth Revision [ICD-10-CM] codes).47 Replication analysis was conducted among comparable cohorts of EA and AA participants in AoU (Supplementary Methods §1). The study was approved by the VUMC Institutional Review Board (IRB# 220725).

Cohort Eligibility

Primary cohort eligibility criteria included BioVU patients with available MEGA genotyping data that passed standard quality controls (see below; Supplementary Methods §2), and at least 2 ICD codes recorded in their EHR through study end date (January 11, 2023). We restricted the study to patients with genetically-determined predominantly EA or AA).48 Although socially identified EHR-reported race is largely consistent with genetic ancestry in BioVU,49–51 to minimize the conflation of genetic and social factors, we further restricted the cohorts to patients with consistent EHR-reported race (i.e., White race for EA patients and Black race for AA patients); individuals with more than one reported race were excluded. We further included adjustment for three principal components (PCs) to help account for intra-ancestral variability.

Clinical characteristics

Patient characteristics were extracted from the EHR, including age (at most recent EHR visit), sex, length of EHR, lipid levels (i.e., TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C), and whether patients were ever prescribed lipid-lowering medications (statins, niacin, or fibrates; Supplementary Table 1); median lipid values were calculated using all measurements after quality control (excluding those that were biologically implausible, e.g. negative values). We adjusted median TG levels for use of lipid-lowering medications for each individual.42,52

Genotyping and Imputation

Genotyping was performed on the MEGA platform with quality control as performed previously (Supplementary Methods §2).53–55 Genetically-determined ancestry and PCs for ancestry were determined following previous reports.48

Genetic variants in TG gene targets

Primary analysis

We assessed 12 variants from 5 genes that have been identified previously by MR as TG-lowering targets: APOA5, LPL, APOC3, ANGPTL3, and ANGPTL4 (Supplementary Table 2).45,46 To validate the suitability of these candidates for our EA and AA cohorts, we compared minor allele frequencies (MAFs) to patients of EA and AA, respectively, in the 1000 Genome project.56 For SNPs with consistent MAFs, we then assessed whether the genotypes were associated with adjusted measured TG levels using linear associations adjusted for age and sex in the EA and AA BioVU cohorts; further analyses testing associations with phenotypes (see below) were restricted to these variants significantly associated with measured TG levels (p<0.05).

Predicted gene expression

We conducted a secondary analysis testing the association between the prespecified phenotypes (see below) and the predicted gene expression of the 5 TG-lowering genes among EA patients (Supplementary Methods §3).

Phenotypes

Phecodes

We established the presence or absence of clinical phenotypes using phecodes, a system based on clinical diagnosis codes (i.e., ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM).57,58 Cases were individuals with 2 or more occurrences of the phecode; controls had zero occurrences; and individuals with 1 mention of the code or related codes were excluded from the analysis to limit misclassification. We required ≥50 cases to include a phecode for analysis.

Phenotype categories

We separated the qualifying phecodes (i.e., ≥50 cases) into 4 categories for analysis in both cohorts, based on previous evidence of association with measured TGs or genetically-determined TG levels (Supplementary Table 3): (1) 4 prespecified lipid phenotypes [i.e., hyperlipidemia, hypercholesterolemia, hyperglyceridemia, and mixed hyperlipidemia], to confirm the efficacy of the target; (2) 4 prespecified cardiovascular phenotypes [i.e., essential hypertension, angina pectoris, coronary atherosclerosis, and other chronic ischemic heart disease, unspecified], to confirm the desired secondary cardiovascular benefits; (3) 13 prespecified other phenotypes previously associated with TGs [i.e., type 2 diabetes, gout, dementias, Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, delirium due to conditions classified elsewhere, headache, migraine, dizziness, diseases of pancreas, acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, and urinary tract infection], to determine if reduced lipid or cardiovascular risk could coincide with elevated risk for known potential secondary outcomes; and (4) all remaining qualifying phecodes in a global PheWAS, to assess whether there are unknown outcomes associated with targeting TG-lowering genes.

Statistical Analysis

For the EA and AA cohorts in BioVU and AoU, we used logistic regression to test the associations between phecodes and previously reported variants from TG-lowering gene targets, with adjustment for age at most recent clinical visit, sex, length of EHR, and 3 PCs for ancestry. In BioVU, for associations with the prespecified clinical phenotypes (i.e., categories 1-3; n=21), we considered p<0.05 as significant, and for the remaining phenotypes in BioVU we considered p<3.13×10−5 (0.05/1600 unspecified phecodes tested) and p<4.69×10−5 (0.05/1065 unspecified phecodes tested) as significant in EA and AA patients, respectively. For the AoU replication cohorts, p<0.05 was considered significant. In the secondary analysis, we used the Generalized Berk-Jones (GBJ) test59 to summarize associations across different tissues, accounting for potential expression correlation;60,61 p<0.05 was considered significant for these tests. We present categorical variables as numbers and percentages and continuous variables as means and standard deviation (SD). All analyses were conducted using R version 4.1.0 and PLINK version 2.0.

RESULTS

Cohort characteristics

The EA cohort from BioVU included 63,094 individuals; 35,320 (56.0%) were female, the mean age at the most recent visit was 54.4 ± 21.8, and the mean length of EHR was 12.0 ± 7.9 years (Table 1). The AA cohort from BioVU included 12,515 individuals; 7,737 (61.8%) were female, the mean age was 45.2 ± 20.5, and the mean length of EHR was 11.8 ± 8.7 years (Table 1). The adjusted TG levels for the EA and AA cohorts were 176.5 ± 118.3 mg/dL and 125.5 ± 88.9 mg/dL, respectively. Characteristics for the replication EA (n=97,532) and AA (n=31,710) cohorts in AoU are available in Supplementary Table 4.

View this table:
Table 1. Demographic summary of BioVU cohorts

European ancestry

The MAF of all 12 previously reported variants from TG-associated genes in the BioVU cohort of EA patients were consistent with ancestral population-wide MAF available from public databases (Supplementary Table 2). We then tested their association with adjusted median measured TGs to validate their use as instrumental variables. Among these 12 variants, 11 variants were significantly associated with measured TGs in the EA cohort (Supplementary Table 5); there was no minor allele carriage for the remaining SNP (rs147210663) to test. We restricted subsequent analyses in the BioVU EA cohort and replication AoU cohort to those significantly associated 11 SNPs.

Association between validated variants and clinical phenotypes

For the primary analysis, we first examined potential associations between the 11 validated variants and 21 prespecified clinical phenotypes. We found 47 significant associations in BioVU EA patients (Figure 1; Supplementary Table 6a). The most significant associations were lipid and cardiovascular phenotypes; 10 of 11 variants were significantly associated with at least one of these phenotypes in the expected direction. Among the potential prespecified secondary effects, we identified associations between the variants and altered risk of urinary tract infection (rs3135506, p=0.019), gout (rs1801177, p=0.026), disease of the pancreas (rs1801177, p=0.038), chronic pancreatitis (rs1801177, p=0.025), and acute pancreatitis (rs268, p=0.029; Figure 1). For the unspecified phenotypes in the global PheWAS (n=1600), there were additional associations with cataplexy and narcolepsy (rs118204057, p=3.42×10−6), glaucoma (rs138326449, p=1.5×10−5), atherosclerosis of the renal artery (rs1801177, p=1.29×10−5), and complication of colostomy or enterostomy (rs1801177, p=1.12×10−5; Supplementary Table 7a; Supplementary File 2).

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Significant associations between prespecified phenotypes and genetic variants in the BioVU European ancestry cohort, with All of Us replication indicated.

○ = replicated in All of Us. blue = significant decreased risk; lower p-values represented by darker hues. red = significant increased risk; lower p-values represented by darker hues.

Replication

In the AoU EA cohort, the validated variants (n=11) had MAF that were consistent with ancestral population wide MAF (Supplementary Table 8). For the 21 prespecified phenotypes, we replicated 27 associations (p<0.05) with these variants (Figure 1; Supplementary Table 9a). Consistent with the BioVU cohort of EA patients, the AoU cohort had significant associations between prespecified lipid phenotypes and genetic variants (i.e., rs268, rs328, rs619054, rs651821, rs3135506, rs11207977, rs115849089, and rs116843064). Additionally, we replicated associations with prespecified cardiovascular phenotypes, including angina pectoris (rs328 and rs115849089), coronary atherosclerosis (rs115849089), and other chronic ischemic heart disease, unspecified (rs115849089). No other prespecified or unspecified phenotypes identified in the BioVU EA cohort were replicated in the AoU EA cohort.

Predicted gene expression

In the secondary analysis, we found that 4 TG-associated genes had sufficient tissue samples to conduct cross-tissue analysis (APOA5 only had a single qualifying tissue). Of these, both LPL and ANGLPTL3 yielded significant associations with prespecified lipid phenotypes; LPL also had significant associations with prespecified cardiovascular phenotypes (Table 2; Supplementary Table 10). Among the prespecified other phenotypes, ANGLPTL3 had significant associations with gout and migraine, while APOC3 had a significant association with dementias.

View this table:
Table 2. Significant associations between prespecified phenotypes and genetically predicted expression of TG-associated genes among BioVU EA patients

African ancestry

The MAF of all 12 previously reported variants from candidate TG genes in the BioVU cohorts of AA patients were consistent with ancestral population-wide MAF available from public databases (Supplementary Table 2). However, only 6 of these variants were significantly associated with measured TGs; 5 variants were not associated, and there was no minor allele carriage for the remaining SNP (Supplementary Table 5).

Association between validated variants and clinical phenotypes

In the AA BioVU cohort, there were fewer significant associations among known TG-associated variants. We identified 2 significant associations between the 6 validated variants and the prespecified lipid or cardiovascular clinical phenotypes: mixed hyperlipidemia (rs11207977, p=4.04×10−3) and angina pectoris (rs1801177, p=0.048; Figure 2; Supplementary Table 6b). Additionally, among prespecified other phenotypes, we found associations with headache (rs11207977, p=0.041; and rs651821, p=0.031), dizziness (rs11207977, p=0.023), and Alzheimer’s disease (rs651821, p=0.029). For the 1065 unspecified phenotypes in the global PheWAS, there were significant associations with heart valve replacement (rs651821, p=1.04×10−5), hemorrhagic disorder due to intrinsic circulating anticoagulants (rs651821, 4.70×10−6), decreased libido (rs1801177, p=2.20×10−6), and stricture of artery (rs147210663, p=2.00×10−5)(Figure 2; Supplementary Tables 7b and 9b; Supplementary File 2).

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Significant associations between prespecified phenotypes and genetic variants in the BioVU African ancestry cohort, with All of Us replication indicated.

○ = replicated in All of Us. blue = significant decreased risk; lower p-values represented by darker hues. red = significant increased risk; lower p-values represented by darker hues.

DISCUSSION

Major findings

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic application of MR and PheWAS approaches, as deployed previously to interrogate drug efficacy and adverse effects7,57,58,62,63 to assess both deleterious and beneficial effects of targeting TG-associated genes; we assessed effects in both EA and AA populations using two extensive EHR databases: BioVU and AoU. We found that for EA individuals, the lipid and cardiovascular benefits were largely confirmed, while we detected few secondary effects (either previously identified or unknown) that might pose increased risk by targeting these TG-associated genes. Among AA individuals, however, we found only limited evidence for lipid and cardiovascular benefits; as with EA individuals, there were few secondary effects associated with these genes.

Benefits of targeting TG-associated genes for hyperlipidemia and cardiovascular phenotypes

Our results support current efforts to target TG-associated genes65,66 for the prevention and treatment of heart disease, particularly among EA individuals. Indeed, 10 variants were significantly associated with hyperlipidemia in the expected direction in the BioVU cohort, and all of these had at least one hyperlipidemia phenotype validated in the AoU cohort. Moreover, 7 of the validated variants were also associated with heart disease-related phenotypes in at least one cohort in the expected direction; 5 variants had significant results in both cohorts (although the phenotypes did not replicate in all instances). The results were relatively consistent for LPL, the primary target for drug development among TG-associated genes, in the secondary analysis using predicted gene expression. In contrast, for AA individuals, the associations between genetic variants and hyperlipidemia-related phenotypes were more limited, consistent with previous findings.42,64 Only 6 out of 12 previously reported variants showed significant associations with adjusted measured TG levels; of these, only 3 variants were significantly associated with hyperlipidemia (phecode 272.*) in either the BioVU or AoU cohort, none replicated, and none of these SNPs were also associated with other cardiovascular phenotypes. Given that AA individuals tend to have lower average TG levels and lower frequencies of severe or moderate hypertriglyceridemia compared to EA individuals,42 it remains unclear whether the same variants have comparable effect sizes on the cardiovascular outcomes in AA and EA populations.

Potential secondary effects from targeting TG-associated genes

Along with the consideration of efficacy for cardiovascular benefits, it was also important to consider the other potential long-term benefits and risks of these drugs, particularly because there has been little evidence regarding the impact of TG-lowering therapies on non-cardiovascular phenotypes associated with TG candidate genes and most studies have focused on EA populations.

Pancreatitis, diabetes, and dementia/Alzheimer’s disease were among the most serious conditions previously associated with TGs and TG-related genes. For EA individuals, our analysis of pancreatitis phenotypes yielded results consistent with previous findings, indicating increased risk of pancreatitis with increased risk of high triglycerides.45,67–72 However, results regarding potential benefits for diabetes prevention were not conclusive, despite previous research indicating this possibility.34,73–77 Likewise, despite prior findings indicating potential linkages between TG-associated genes and ADRD, we found limited evidence of robust associations (i.e., a secondary analysis that found an association between dementias and APOC3 in EA patients) which supports ideas that TG-lowering treatment could reduce the risk of dementia or Alzheimer’s diseases.78–82 The lack of consistent results parallel research assessing the relationship between LDL-C lowering treatments (i.e., statins) and dementias; indeed, the association between lipid management and the benefit for Alzheimer’s disease remains controversial.83–88 We found no consistent evidence to support these potential secondary beneficial effects among AA individuals.

Strengths and limitations

Our study featured several notable strengths. First, the combined use of MR and PheWAS enabled an unbiased investigation of over 1,000 clinical phenotypes. Second, leveraging longitudinal EHR data from BioVU and AoU allowed us to evaluate long-term effects in both EA and AA individuals. This is particularly significant as the AA population has historically been underrepresented in genetic and pharmacogenetic research. Moreover, the use of two large cohorts offered more robust results. Finally, by focusing on previously reported variants, our study contributed to a more nuanced understanding of the long-term effects—both beneficial and deleterious—of TG-lowering medications.

However, there were limitations. First, despite conducting analyses in two large biobanks, the AA population remained relatively small, which limits the statistical power compared to EA individuals, especially for low-frequency variants. Future validation using larger, multi-ancestry cohorts is needed. As AoU continues to recruit participants, this analysis may be more informed with an updated dataset. Second, this study focused exclusively on previously reported variants within candidate TG-lowering targets. There may be other unidentified functional variants whose impact on the association results remains unknown, particularly in the AA population. Given the historical underrepresentation of the AA population in genetic studies, it is possible that some important ancestry-specific TG-related variants remain unidentified. With the expansion of multi-ancestry biobanks and whole-genome sequencing data, future studies could aim to include more diverse ancestry groups and investigate low-frequency genetic variants. Similarly, larger populations of elderly patients could more readily reveal associations between these TG-related variants and certain age-related outcomes, including Alzheimer’s and diabetes. As the AoU cohort ages, we anticipate the ability to more effectively conduct such research with more available long-term outcomes. Fourth, additional factors (e.g., comorbidities and social determinants of health) could affect these outcomes; moreover, these factors could help explain why lipid-lowering effects do not correspond automatically to reduced cardiovascular risk. Fifth, we were unable to complete analysis of APOA5 in the secondary analysis given the limited availability of tissues, nor were we able to complete secondary analysis among patients of AA. Finally, detecting protective effects can be more challenging than demonstrating adverse effects related to known risk alleles (e.g., lowered diabetes risk). It is possible that there will be protective benefits from drugs targeting TG-lowering genes, but we do not yet have sufficient power to detect these effects.

CONCLUSION

By leveraging two large EHR-based biobanks (BioVU and AoU), we applied genetic approaches to evaluate the associations between clinical phenotypes and previously reported TG variants in both EA and AA populations. We confirmed the TG-lowering effect for most of the candidate genes in EA individuals, which suggest a beneficial effect for preventing cardiovascular disease. Our results also suggest the potential for a few additional beneficial effects, with few deleterious effects, for EA individuals using TG-lowering treatments; however, these results do not provide comparable evidence to assess the efficacy and safety of these treatments for AA individuals. As datasets continue to grow in breadth (e.g., whole genome sequencing and survey data regarding social drivers of health) and length of follow-up, testing in populations other than those of EA is a priority.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

https://github.com/FengLabVUMC/Triglyceride-PheWAS

DECLARATIONS

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the VUMC Institutional Review Board (IRB# 220725).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

BioVU data and code

Statistical code: Available at https://github.com/FengLabVUMC/Triglyceride-PheWAS. Data set: Full summary statistics for validated variants and qualifying phenotypes are available in Supplementary File 2. For individual level data, VUMC EHR data are de-identified using Safe-harbor methods. BioVU genomic data are linked to de-identified records and are further protected by BioVU data use agreements ensuring that researchers will not attempt re-identification. BioVU participant consenting procedures limit access to individual level data. Limited primary cohort data are available by request to Dr. Feng (e-mail, Qiping.feng@vumc.org), pending BioVU approval and a data use agreement.

All of Us data and code

In line with the privacy standards set by the All of Us Research Program, data and code used for these cohorts are available to approved researchers who register for access to the Researcher Workbench platform at https://workbench.researchallofus.org/login. This analysis was run on the All of Us Research Program Controlled Tier Dataset version 7, production release C2022Q4R9.

Competing interests

The authors declared no competing interests for this work.

Funding

R01HL163854 (Q.F.), R01GM120523 (Q.F.), R01HL133786 (W.Q.W.), R01HL171809 (Q.F, W.Q.W) and Vanderbilt Faculty Research Scholar Fund (Q.F.).

The primary dataset(s) were obtained from Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s BioVU, which is supported by institutional funding, 1S10RR025141-01, and CTSA grants UL1TR002243, UL1TR000445, and UL1RR024975. Additional funding provided by the NIH through grants P50GM115305 and U19HL065962. The authors wish to acknowledge the expert technical support of the VANTAGE and VANGARD core facilities, supported in part by the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (P30 CA068485) and Vanderbilt Vision Center (P30 EY08126).

The validation dataset(s) were obtained form the All of Us Research Program. This program would not be possible without the partnership of its participants. Additionally, the All of Us Research Program is supported by the National Institutes of Health, Office of the Director: Regional Medical Centers: 1 OT2 OD026549; 1 OT2 OD026554; 1 OT2 OD026557; 1 OT2 OD026556; 1 OT2 OD026550; 1 OT2 OD 026552; 1 OT2 OD026553; 1 OT2 OD026548; 1 OT2 OD026551; 1 OT2 OD026555; IAA #: AOD 16037; Federally Qualified Health Centers: HHSN 263201600085U; Data and Research Center: 5 U2C OD023196; Biobank: 1 U24 OD023121; The Participant Center: U24 OD023176; Participant Technology Systems Center: 1 U24 OD023163; Communications and Engagement: 3 OT2 OD023205; 3 OT2 OD023206; and Community Partners: 1 OT2 OD025277; 3 OT2 OD025315; 1 OT2 OD025337; 1 OT2 OD025276.

Author contributions

QF, CMS, WQW, and NJC conceived and designed the research; EO, YX, LJ, GK, SK, XZ, and QF acquired, analyzed, and interpreted data; QF, ALD, and CMS drafted the manuscript; all authors have approved the submitted version of this manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The first and corresponding authors had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Footnotes

  • Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

List of abbreviations

AA
African ancestry
ADRD
Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias
AoU
All of Us Research Program
CHD
coronary heart disease
EA
European ancestry
EHR
electronic health record
GBJ
generalized Berk-Jones
HDL-C
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
ICD-9-CM
International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification
ICD-10-CM
International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification
IRB
Institutional Review Board
LDL-C
low density lipoprotein cholesterol
MAF
minor allele frequency
MEGA
Illumina Infinium Expanded Multi-Ethnic Genotyping Array
MR
Mendelian randomization
PC
principal component
PheWAS
phenome wide association study
SD
standard deviation
TG
triglyceride
VUMC
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

References

  1. ↵
    The top 10 causes of death. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death (accessed 19 Apr2023).
  2. ↵
    Miller M, Stone NJ, Ballantyne C, Bittner V, Criqui MH, Ginsberg HN et al. Triglycerides and Cardiovascular Disease A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123: 2292–2333.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Hokanson JE, Austin MA. Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. J Cardiovasc Risk 1996; 3: 213–219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Nichols GA, Philip S, Reynolds K, Granowitz CB, Fazio S. Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertriglyceridemic Patients With Statin-Controlled LDL Cholesterol. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2018; 103: 3019–3027.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. Mszar R, Bart S, Sakers A, Soffer D, Karalis DG. Current and Emerging Therapies for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction in Hypertriglyceridemia. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2023; 12: 1382.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    Hussain A, Al Rifai M, Hermel M, Slipczuk L, Virani SS. What is really new in triglyceride guidelines? Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity 2023; 30: 73.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Liu G, Shi M, Mosley JD, Weng C, Zhang Y, Lee MTM et al. A Mendelian Randomization Approach Using 3-HMG-Coenzyme-A Reductase Gene Variation to Evaluate the Association of Statin-Induced Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering With Noncardiovascular Disease Phenotypes. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4: e2112820.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Smit RAJ, Trompet S, Leong A, Goodarzi MO, Postmus I, Warren H et al. Statin-induced LDL cholesterol response and type 2 diabetes: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study. The Pharmacogenomics Journal 2019; : 1–9.
  9. Gill D, Georgakis MK, Koskeridis F, Jiang L, Feng Q, Wei W-Q et al. Use of Genetic Variants Related to Antihypertensive Drugs to Inform on Efficacy and Side Effects. Circulation 2019; 140: 270–279.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. Satterfield BA, Dikilitas O, Safarova MS, Clarke SL, Tcheandjieu C, Zhu X, et al. Associations of Genetically Predicted Lp(a) (Lipoprotein [a]) Levels With Cardiovascular Traits in Individuals of European and African Ancestry. Circ Genom Precis Med 2021; 14: e003354.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Ference BA, Kastelein JJP, Ray KK, Ginsberg HN, Chapman MJ, Packard CJ et al. Association of Triglyceride-Lowering LPL Variants and LDL-C–Lowering LDLR Variants With Risk of Coronary Heart Disease. JAMA 2019; 321: 364–373.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Ference BA, Majeed F, Penumetcha R, Flack JM, Brook RD. Effect of Naturally Random Allocation to Lower Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol on the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease Mediated by Polymorphisms in NPC1L1, HMGCR, or Both: A 2 × 2 Factorial Mendelian Randomization Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015; 65: 1552–1561.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    TG T, HDL Working Group of the Exome Sequencing Project National Heart, Lung, Institute B. Loss-of-Function Mutations in APOC3, Triglycerides, and Coronary Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2014; 371: 22–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. Do R, Stitziel NO, Won H-H, Jørgensen AB, Duga S, Angelica Merlini P et al. Exome sequencing identifies rare LDLR and APOA5 alleles conferring risk for myocardial infarction. Nature 2015; 518: 102–106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. Douvris A, Soubeyrand S, Naing T, Martinuk A, Nikpay M, Williams A et al. Functional Analysis of the TRIB1 Associated Locus Linked to Plasma Triglycerides and Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American Heart Association 2014; 3: e000884.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. Do R, Willer CJ, Schmidt EM, Sengupta S, Gao C, Peloso GM et al. Common variants associated with plasma triglycerides and risk for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 1345–1352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. Triglyceride Coronary Disease Genetics Consortium and Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Sarwar N, Sandhu MS, Ricketts SL, Butterworth AS, Di Angelantonio E et al. Triglyceride-mediated pathways and coronary disease: collaborative analysis of 101 studies. Lancet 2010; 375: 1634–1639.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Holmes MV, Asselbergs FW, Palmer TM, Drenos F, Lanktree MB, Nelson CP et al. Mendelian randomization of blood lipids for coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 539–550.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Lotta LA, Stewart ID, Sharp SJ, Day FR, Burgess S, Luan J et al. Association of Genetically Enhanced Lipoprotein Lipase-Mediated Lipolysis and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Lowering Alleles With Risk of Coronary Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Cardiol 2018; 3: 957–966.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    Musunuru K, Pirruccello JP, Do R, Peloso GM, Guiducci C, Sougnez C et al. Exome sequencing, ANGPTL3 mutations, and familial combined hypolipidemia. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2220–2227.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. Dewey FE, Gusarova V, Dunbar RL, O’Dushlaine C, Schurmann C, Gottesman O et al. Genetic and Pharmacologic Inactivation of ANGPTL3 and Cardiovascular Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2017; 377: 211–221.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. Jørgensen AB, Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A. Loss-of-Function Mutations in APOC3 and Risk of Ischemic Vascular Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2014; 371: 32–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. Genetics MI, Investigators CardiEC. Coding Variation in ANGPTL4, LPL, and SVEP1 and the Risk of Coronary Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2016; 374: 1134–1144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. Dewey FE, Gusarova V, O’Dushlaine C, Gottesman O, Trejos J, Hunt C et al. Inactivating Variants in ANGPTL4 and Risk of Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1123–1133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. Nordestgaard BG, Abildgaard S, Wittrup HH, Steffensen R, Jensen G, Tybjærg-Hansen A. Heterozygous Lipoprotein Lipase Deficiency. Circulation 1997; 96: 1737–1744.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Wittrup HH, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Lipoprotein Lipase Mutations, Plasma Lipids and Lipoproteins, and Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease. Circulation 1999; 99: 2901–2907.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Ray WA, Stein CM, Daugherty JR, Hall K, Arbogast PG, Griffin MR. COX-2 selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of serious coronary heart disease. The Lancet 2002; 360: 1071–1073.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    Ray WA, Stein CM, Hall K, Daugherty JR, Griffin MR. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of serious coronary heart disease: an observational cohort study. The Lancet 2002; 359: 118–123.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    Safarova MS, Satterfield BA, Fan X, Austin EE, Ye Z, Bastarache L, et al. A phenome-wide association study to discover pleiotropic effects of PCSK9, APOB, and LDLR. NPJ Genom Med 2019; 4: 3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    Li Z, Zhang B, Liu Q, Tao Z, Ding L, Guo B et al. Genetic association of lipids and lipid-lowering drug target genes with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. EBioMedicine 2023; 90: 104543.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    Mead JR, Ramji DP. The pivotal role of lipoprotein lipase in atherosclerosis. Cardiovascular Research 2002; 55: 261–269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. Mead JR, Irvine SA, Ramji DP. Lipoprotein lipase: structure, function, regulation, and role in disease. J Mol Med 2002; 80: 753–769.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. Hu Y, Li M, Lu Q, Weng H, Wang J, Zekavat SM et al. A statistical framework for cross-tissue transcriptome-wide association analysis. Nat Genet 2019; 51: 568–576.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Digenio A, Dunbar RL, Alexander VJ, Hompesch M, Morrow L, Lee RG et al. Antisense-Mediated Lowering of Plasma Apolipoprotein C-III by Volanesorsen Improves Dyslipidemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016; 39: 1408–1415.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Park JK, Bafna S, Forrest IS, Duffy Á, Marquez-Luna C, Petrazzini BO et al. Phenome-wide Mendelian randomization study of plasma triglyceride levels and 2600 disease traits. eLife 2023; 12: e80560.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    Miller M, Stone NJ, Ballantyne C, Bittner V, Criqui MH, Ginsberg HN et al. Triglycerides and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123: 2292–2333.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  37. Frank ATH, Zhao B, Jose PO, Azar KMJ, Fortmann SP, Palaniappan LP. Racial/Ethnic Differences in Dyslipidemia Patterns. Circulation 2014; 129: 570–579.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. Meeks KAC, Bentley AR, Agyemang C, Galenkamp H, Born B-JH van den, Hanssen NMJ et al. Ancestral and environmental patterns in the association between triglycerides and other cardiometabolic risk factors. eBioMedicine 2023; 91. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104548.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. Sumner AE. Ethnic Differences in Triglyceride Levels and High-Density Lipoprotein Lead to Underdiagnosis of the Metabolic Syndrome in Black Children and Adults. J Pediatr 2009; 155: S7.e7–S7.11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. Lin SX, Carnethon M, Szklo M, Bertoni A. Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Association of Triglycerides with Other Metabolic Syndrome Components: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders 2011; 9: 35.
    OpenUrl
  41. Li C, Ford ES, Meng Y-X, Mokdad AH, Reaven GM. Does the association of the triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with fasting serum insulin differ by race/ethnicity? Cardiovascular Diabetology 2008; 7: 4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    Jiang L, Gangireddy S, Dickson AL, Xin Y, Yan C, Kawai V et al. Characterizing genetic profiles for high triglyceride levels in U.S. patients of African ancestry. J Lipid Res 2024; : 100569.
  43. Gill PK, Dron JS, Dilliott AA, McIntyre AD, Cao H, Wang J et al. Ancestry-specific profiles of genetic determinants of severe hypertriglyceridemia. J Clin Lipidol 2021; 15: 88–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Graham SE, Clarke SL, Wu K-HH, Kanoni S, Zajac GJM, Ramdas S et al. The power of genetic diversity in genome-wide association studies of lipids. Nature 2021; : 1–11.
  45. ↵
    Hansen SEJ, Madsen CM, Varbo A, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Genetic Variants Associated With Increased Plasma Levels of Triglycerides, via Effects on the Lipoprotein Lipase Pathway, Increase Risk of Acute Pancreatitis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2020. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.016.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. ↵
    Wang Q, Oliver-Williams C, Raitakari OT, Viikari J, Lehtimäki T, Kähönen M et al. Metabolic profiling of angiopoietin-like protein 3 and 4 inhibition: a drug-target Mendelian randomization analysis. Eur Heart J 2021; 42: 1160–1169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Wei W-Q, Denny JC. Extracting research-quality phenotypes from electronic health records to support precision medicine. Genome Med 2015; 7: 41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Zhang D, Dey R, Lee S. Fast and robust ancestry prediction using principal component analysis. Bioinformatics 2020; 36: 3439–3446.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Dumitrescu L, Ritchie MD, Brown-Gentry K, Pulley JM, Basford M, Denny JC et al. Assessing the accuracy of observer-reported ancestry in a biorepository linked to electronic medical records. Genet Med 2010; 12: 648–650.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. Hall JB, Dumitrescu L, Dilks HH, Crawford DC, Bush WS. Accuracy of Administratively-Assigned Ancestry for Diverse Populations in an Electronic Medical Record-Linked Biobank. PLoS One 2014; 9: e99161.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Dickson AL, Daniel LL, Jackson E, Zanussi J, Yang W, Plummer WD et al. Race, Genotype, and Azathioprine Discontinuation!]: A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175: 1092–1099.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. ↵
    Hu Y, Graff M, Haessler J, Buyske S, Bien SA, Tao R et al. Minority-centric meta-analyses of blood lipid levels identify novel loci in the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) study. PLoS Genet 2020; 16: e1008684.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    McCarthy S, Das S, Kretzschmar W, Delaneau O, Wood AR, Teumer A et al. A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nat Genet 2016; 48: 1279–1283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. Jiang L, Liu G, Oeser A, Ihegword A, Dickson AL, Daniel LL et al. Association between APOL1 risk variants and the occurrence of sepsis in patients hospitalized with infections. eLife 2023; 12. doi:10.7554/eLife.88538.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. ↵
    Liu G, Jiang L, Kerchberger VE, Oeser A, Ihegword A, Dickson AL et al. The relationship between high density lipoprotein cholesterol and sepsis: A clinical and genetic approach. Clin Transl Sci 2023. doi:10.1111/cts.13462.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Auton A, Abecasis GR, Altshuler DM, Durbin RM, Abecasis GR, Bentley DR et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 2015; 526: 68–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    Wei W-Q, Bastarache LA, Carroll RJ, Marlo JE, Osterman TJ, Gamazon ER et al. Evaluating phecodes, clinical classification software, and ICD-9-CM codes for phenome-wide association studies in the electronic health record. PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0175508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Wu P, Gifford A, Meng X, Li X, Campbell H, Varley T et al. Mapping ICD-10 and ICD-10-CM Codes to Phecodes: Workflow Development and Initial Evaluation. JMIR Medical Informatics 2019; 7: e14325.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    Sun R, Lin X. Genetic Variant Set-Based Tests Using the Generalized Berk-Jones Statistic with Application to a Genome-Wide Association Study of Breast Cancer. J Am Stat Assoc 2020; 115: 1079–1091.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    Uellendahl-Werth F, Maj C, Borisov O, Juzenas S, Wacker EM, Jørgensen IF, et al. Cross-tissue transcriptome-wide association studies identify susceptibility genes shared between schizophrenia and inflammatory bowel disease. Commun Biol 2022; 5: 1–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Gaynor SM, Sun R, Lin X, Quackenbush J. Identification of differentially expressed gene sets using the Generalized Berk-Jones statistic. Bioinformatics 2019; 35: 4568–4576.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  62. ↵
    Kullo I, Safarova M, Satterfield B, Fan X, Austin E, Bastarache L, et al. A Phenome-Wide Association Study to Discover Pleiotropic Effects of PCSK9, APOB, and LDLR. npj Genomic Medicine; in press.
  63. ↵
    Denny JC, Ritchie MD, Basford MA, Pulley JM, Bastarache L, Brown-Gentry K et al. PheWAS: demonstrating the feasibility of a phenome-wide scan to discover gene-disease associations. Bioinformatics 2010; 26: 1205–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  64. ↵
    Patel RA, Musharoff SA, Spence JP, Pimentel H, Tcheandjieu C, Mostafavi H et al. Genetic interactions drive heterogeneity in causal variant effect sizes for gene expression and complex traits. Am J Hum Genet 2022; 109: 1286–1297.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Feingold KR,
    2. Anawalt B,
    3. Blackman MR,
    4. Boyce A,
    5. Chrousos G,
    6. Corpas E
    Feingold KR. Triglyceride Lowering Drugs. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E et al. (eds). Endotext. MDText.com, Inc.: South Dartmouth (MA), 2000 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425699/ (accessed 26 Sep2024).
  66. ↵
    Research C for DE and. FDA approves add-on therapy for patients with genetic form of severely high cholesterol. FDA 2024. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/fda-approves-add-therapy-patients-genetic-form-severely-high-cholesterol-0 (accessed 26 Sep2024).
  67. ↵
    Wang B, Dron JS, Wang Y, Choi SH, Huffman JE, Cho K et al. Lipid levels and risk of acute pancreatitis using bidirectional Mendelian randomization. Sci Rep 2024; 14: 6267.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. Mi J, Liu Z, Jiang L, Li M, Wu X, Zhao N et al. Mendelian randomization in blood metabolites identifies triglycerides and fatty acids saturation level as associated traits linked to pancreatitis risk. Front Nutr 2022; 9: 1021942.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  69. Yuan S, Giovannucci EL, Larsson SC. Gallstone disease, diabetes, calcium, triglycerides, smoking and alcohol consumption and pancreatitis risk: Mendelian randomization study. NPJ Genom Med 2021; 6: 27.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. Adiamah A, Psaltis E, Crook M, Lobo DN. A systematic review of the epidemiology, pathophysiology and current management of hyperlipidaemic pancreatitis. Clin Nutr 2018; 37: 1810–1822.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. Brunzell JD, Deeb SS. Familial Lipoprotein Lipase Deficiency, Apo C-II Deficiency, and Hepatic Lipase Deficiency. In: The Online Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease.
  72. ↵
    1. Adam MP,
    2. Feldman J,
    3. Mirzaa GM,
    4. Pagon RA,
    5. Wallace SE,
    6. Bean LJ
    Burnett JR, Hooper AJ, Hegele RA. Familial Lipoprotein Lipase Deficiency. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJ et al. (eds). GeneReviews®. University of Washington, Seattle: Seattle (WA), 1993 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1308/ (accessed 28 Sep2024).
  73. ↵
    Robciuc MR, Maranghi M, Lahikainen A, Rader D, Bensadoun A, Öörni K et al. Angptl3 Deficiency Is Associated With Increased Insulin Sensitivity, Lipoprotein Lipase Activity, and Decreased Serum Free Fatty Acids. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 2013; 33: 1706–1713.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. Graham MJ, Lee RG, Brandt TA, Tai L-J, Fu W, Peralta R et al. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects of ANGPTL3 Antisense Oligonucleotides. New England Journal of Medicine 2017; 377: 222–232.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. Goldberg RB, Bittner VA, Dunbar RL, Fleg JL, Grunberger G, Guyton JR et al. Effects of Extended-Release Niacin Added to Simvastatin/Ezetimibe on Glucose and Insulin Values in AIM-HIGH. Am J Med 2016; 129: 753.e13–22.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  76. Robciuc MR, Maranghi M, Lahikainen A, Rader D, Bensadoun A, Öörni K et al. Angptl3 Deficiency Is Associated With Increased Insulin Sensitivity, Lipoprotein Lipase Activity, and Decreased Serum Free Fatty Acids. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 2013; 33: 1706–1713.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    Digenio A, Dunbar RL, Alexander VJ, Hompesch M, Morrow L, Lee RG et al. Antisense-Mediated Lowering of Plasma Apolipoprotein C-III by Volanesorsen Improves Dyslipidemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016; 39: 1408–1415.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    Dimache AM, Șalaru DL, Sascău R, Stătescu C. The Role of High Triglycerides Level in Predicting Cognitive Impairment: A Review of Current Evidence. Nutrients 2021; 13: 2118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. Koch M, DeKosky ST, Goodman M, Sun J, Furtado JD, Fitzpatrick AL et al. High density lipoprotein and its apolipoprotein-defined subspecies and risk of dementia. J Lipid Res 2020; 61: 445–454.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. Bruce KD, Tang M, Reigan P, Eckel RH. Genetic Variants of Lipoprotein Lipase and Regulatory Factors Associated with Alzheimer’s Disease Risk. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020; 21: 8338.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  81. Gong H, Dong W, Rostad SW, Marcovina SM, Albers JJ, Brunzell JD et al. Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is associated with neurite pathology and its levels are markedly reduced in the dentate gyrus of Alzheimer’s disease brains. J Histochem Cytochem 2013; 61: 857–868.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    Xian X, Liu T, Yu J, Wang Y, Miao Y, Zhang J et al. Presynaptic defects underlying impaired learning and memory function in lipoprotein lipase-deficient mice. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 4681–4685.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    Jick H, Zornberg GL, Jick SS, Seshadri S, Drachman DA. Statins and the risk of dementia. Lancet 2000; 356: 1627–1631.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  84. Wolozin B, Kellman W, Ruosseau P, Celesia GG, Siegel G. Decreased prevalence of Alzheimer disease associated with 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. Arch Neurol 2000; 57: 1439–1443.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  85. Feldman HH, Doody RS, Kivipelto M, Sparks DL, Waters DD, Jones RW et al. Randomized controlled trial of atorvastatin in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2010; 74: 956–964.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. Sano M, Bell KL, Galasko D, Galvin JE, Thomas RG, van Dyck CH et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of simvastatin to treat Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2011; 77: 556–563.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. Wei B-Z, Li L, Dong C-W, Tan C-C, Initiative for the ADN, Xu W. The Relationship of Omega-3 Fatty Acids with Dementia and Cognitive Decline: Evidence from Prospective Cohort Studies of Supplementation, Dietary Intake, and Blood Markers. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2023; 117: 1096.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    Quinn JF, Raman R, Thomas RG, Yurko-Mauro K, Nelson EB, Van Dyck C et al. Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation and cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease: a randomized trial. JAMA 2010; 304: 1903–1911.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  89. Ballantyne CM, Vasas S, Azizad M, Clifton P, Rosenson RS, Chang T et al. Plozasiran, an RNA Interference Agent Targeting APOC3, for Mixed Hyperlipidemia. N Engl J Med 2024; 391: 899–912.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  90. Hansen SEJ, Madsen CM, Varbo A, Nordestgaard BG. Low-Grade Inflammation in the Association between Mild-to-Moderate Hypertriglyceridemia and Risk of Acute Pancreatitis: A Study of More Than 115000 Individuals from the General Population. Clin Chem 2019; 65: 321–332.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. Rashid N, Sharma PP, Scott RD, Lin KJ, Toth PP. Severe hypertriglyceridemia and factors associated with acute pancreatitis in an integrated health care system. J Clin Lipidol 2016; 10: 880–890.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  92. Navina S, Acharya C, DeLany JP, Orlichenko LS, Baty CJ, Shiva SS et al. Lipotoxicity Causes Multisystem Organ Failure and Exacerbates Acute Pancreatitis in Obesity. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3: 107ra110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  93. Lazarte J, Wang J, McIntyre AD, Hegele RA. Prevalence of severe hypertriglyceridemia and pancreatitis in familial partial lipodystrophy type 2. J Clin Lipidol 2021; 15: 653–657.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  94. Laufs U, Parhofer KG, Ginsberg HN, Hegele RA. Clinical review on triglycerides. Eur Heart J 2020; 41: 99–109c.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Feingold KR,
    2. Anawalt B,
    3. Blackman MR,
    4. Boyce A,
    5. Chrousos G,
    6. Corpas E
    Feingold KR, Grunfeld C. The Effect of Inflammation and Infection on Lipids and Lipoproteins. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Blackman MR, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Corpas E et al. (eds). Endotext. MDText.com, Inc.: South Dartmouth (MA), 2000 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK326741/ (accessed 1 Nov2024).
  96. Hall SA, Chiu GR, Link CL, Steers WD, Kupelian V, McKinlay JB. Are Statin Medications Associated with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men and Women? Results from the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) Survey. Annals of Epidemiology 2011; 21: 149–155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. Goyal A, Changez MIK, Tariq MD, Mushtaq F, Shamim U, Sohail AH et al. Efficacy and outcomes of Bempedoic acid versus placebo in patients with statin-intolerance: A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Current Problems in Cardiology 2024; 49: 102236.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  98. Hamrick I, Ball M. Are statins associated with bladder symptoms? Evidence-Based Practice 2017; 20: 5.
    OpenUrl
  99. Rosenson RS, Burgess LJ, Ebenbichler CF, Baum SJ, Stroes ESG, Ali S et al. Evinacumab in Patients with Refractory Hypercholesterolemia. New England Journal of Medicine 2020; 383: 2307–2319.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Posted March 10, 2025.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Using Mendelian randomization to assess long-term pleiotropic effects of potential novel triglyceride-lowering medications
Elliot Outland, Yi Xin, Alyson L. Dickson, Xue Zhong, Gul Karakoc, Sevim Kilic, Lan Jiang, Nancy J. Cox, Wei-Qi Wei, C. Michael Stein, QiPing Feng
medRxiv 2025.03.07.25323588; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.07.25323588
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area