Knowledge, Practice, And Associated Factors Of Nurses Related To Pressure Ulcer Prevention In Selected Hospitals In Southern Ethiopia”, 2024

2.1 Study design, area and period

Institutional based cross sectional study design was conducted at selected public hospitals in Southern Ethiopia Regional State from May to June 2024. The selected public hospitals were Dilla University Referral Hospital (DURH), ArbaMinch General Hospital (AMGH) and Jinka General Hospital (JGH). DURH is located at Gedeo zone in Dilla town and is found on the main road from Addis Ababa to Nairobi, approximately 360 km from Addis Ababa, and 154 km from Wolaita Sodo. There are 142 nurses in DURH. The hospital has more than 2 million people of catchment area that lives in Dilla town, surrounding zones of southern Ethiopia, Sidama and Oromia region.

Whereas ArbaMinch General Hospital AMGH is located in southern, Ethiopia it is one of general hospitals in southern regional state of Ethiopia of Gamo Zone. It is situated in ArbaMinch Town, the capital of Gamo Zone. The town is found about 505 km South of Addis Ababa and 122 km from Wolaita Sodo, the capital of the Southern Ethiopia. There are 154 of total nurses in AMGH.

Jinka General Hospital is one general hospital found in southern Ethiopia regional state and which was established in 1991.The hospital has 120 beds and gives inpatient and outpatient services in its general outpatient department. Jinka town is the capital of South Omo zone located 691 km away from Addis Ababa and 267 km away from Wolaita sodo of southern Ethiopia Regional State. There are 137 nurses in Jinka General Hospital.

2.2 Population

2.3 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

2.3.5 Sampling techniques

The list or frame of nurses working in selected hospitals was obtained from the monthly work schedule prepared by the head nurse of each ward. There were six public general and refe hospitals in Southern Ethiopia Regional State and from those three (DURH, ArbaMinch, and Jinka General) hospitals were selected using simple random sampling, lottery method. A total of 433 nurses working in three selected hospitals selected: 84 nurses from a total of 154 nurses working in ArbaMinch general hospital; 77 nurses from 142 working in Dilla University referral hospital; 74 from a total of 137 working in Jinka general hospital; were selected, with a final number of 235 study subjects; nurses was selected proportionally using simple random sampling method from each hospital.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig 1

conceptual framework of knowledge, practice and associated factors of PUP among nurses in selected hospitals in southern Ethiopia (Nuru et al., 2015; Tesfa Mengist et al., 2022).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig 2

diagrain1natic representation of sa1npling technique

3.1 Data collection tools and procedure

The structured questioner for knowledge and practice of pressure ulcer was adapted from study conducted in Gondar university hospital and Afghanistan (Muhammad et al., 2017; Tesfa Mengist et al., 2022),with the internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α) correlation coefficient of 0.88. But, socio-demographic items modified according the socio-cultural context of the community where study was done. Six BSC nurses and three Public Health Officers collected the data with close supervision. The questionnaire tool has five sections: socio-demographic part (sex, age, work experience, marital status, educational status, monthly salary), clinical factors (received training, use of guidelines, unproportionate patient nurse ratio, staff workload, staff cooperativeness, patient cooperativeness, and area of practice) and organizational factors (formal training on pressure ulcer prevention, staff shortage, inadequate guideline on pup, inadequate facility equipment, type of institution, and nursing leadership). Pressure Ulcer Prevention Knowledge and Practices Assessment Instrument were used for dependent variables. The instrument consists of 22 knowledge and 10 practices based questions.

Data quality was controlled by giving trainings and appropriate supervisions for data collectors. The overall supervision was carried out by the principal investigator. A pre-test was conducted using 10 % of the questionnaire on nurses who were working in Wolaita Sodo University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. An appropriate modification was made after analyzing the pretest result before the actual data collection. A total of 235 study participants was selected using simple random sampling technique, where each member of the population has equal chance of being selected for final survey. Request for consent from nurses prior the collection. Continuous follow-up and supervision was given by supervisors throughout the data collection period.

3.2 Data processing, analysis and presentation

The questionnaires collected by kobotool.box were checked for completeness and exported to SPSS version 26 for further analysis. Descriptive statistics like texts, tables, graphs, and frequency was used to present participants’ characteristics. Both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify associated factors. Odds Ratios and their 95 % Confidence Intervals were computed and variables with p - value less than 0.05 was considered as significantly associated with the outcome variable.

4.1 Socio demographic characteristics of the nurses

A total of 235 professional nurses were invited to participate in the study, and the response rate was 95.7% of which the majority of the respondents 130 (57.7%) were males. Moreover, the age of the participants ranged from 20 to 30 years, (74.2%) (n= 167) with a mean age of 26.45 ± 3.316 years. More than half (56%) were single whereas 44% of them were married. Regarding the educational status, the majority of them 85.8 (n=193) were first-degree holders, while 14.2% (n=32) were second degree holders.

Furthermore 12% (27) of these respondents had 1-2 years’ experience, about 57.8 %(130) of the respondents had 2-5 years’ experience and about 30.2 %(68) of the respondents had more than 5 years’ experience. Among the participants, 82.2 %(n=185) had a monthly income ranging from 6193 to 8017 Ethiopian birr and 17.8% (n=40) had a monthly income above 8017 Ethiopian birr. (Table1).

4.2 Pressure ulcer prevention practice

Of the respondents, 137 (60.9%) had good practice, while 88 (39.1%) of the respondents had a poor practice with the mean value of 7.85 ± 1.723 for the prevention of pressure ulcers (Figure 3).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3

Pressure ulcer prevention practice among nurses working in southern Ethiopia hospitals, South Ethiopia, 2024 (n = 225).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig 3

Pressure ulcer prevention knowledge among nurses working in southern Ethiopia hospitals, South Ethiopia, 2024 (n = 225).

4.3 Pressure ulcer prevention knowledge

Of the total respondents, 139 (61.8 %) of them had good pressure ulcer prevention knowledge; whereas the remaining 86 (38.2%) of the respondents had poor knowledge with a mean value of 18.04 ± 2.575 (Figure 4).

4.4 Factors associated with pressure ulcer prevention of practices

Knowledge, use of pressure ulcer prevention guideline, formal training on pressure ulcer prevention, and nursing leadership were associated with pressure ulcer prevention practices of nurses working in the hospital. Nurses having good knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention were 6.9 times more likely to have good pressure ulcer prevention practices than nurses who have a poor level of knowledge (AOR = 6.940 ; CI: 3.527-13.656).

Nurses using pressure ulcer prevention guidelines were 3.3 times having good practices about pressure ulcer prevention than nurses who did not use the guideline (AOR = 3.3574; CI: (1.317- 8.539).

Nurses those taken formal training on pressure ulcer prevention guideline was 2.2 times having good practices about pressure ulcer prevention than nurses who did not use the guideline (AOR = 2.253; CI: (1.044-4.862). Nurses who were satisfied with nursing leadership were 2.2 times more likely to have good practice than those who were not satisfied with nursing leadership AOR = 2.246; CI: (1.064-4.742). (Table 5).

4.5 Factors associated with pressure ulcer prevention of knowledge

Experience, marital status, use of pressure sore guideline and formal training and on pressure ulcer prevention were associated with pressure ulcer prevention knowledge of nurses working in the hospitals. Nurses with work experience of greater than five years were 3.5 times having good knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention than nurses work experience of one to two years(AOR = 3.52; CI: (1.343-9.244).

Nurses with work experience of three to five years were 2.9 times having good knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention than nurses work experience of one to two years (AOR = 2.995; CI: (1.302-6.887). Nurses using pressure ulcer prevention guidelines were 2.6 times having good knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention than nurses who did not use the guideline (AOR = 2.695; CI: (1.209-6.008).

The marital status of nurses being married was relatively 58% less likely to having good pressure ulcer prevention knowledge than being single (AOR = 0.414; CI: (0.219-0.780).

Nurses those taken formal training on pressure ulcer prevention guidelines were 2.9 times having good knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention than nurses who did not use the guideline (AOR = 2.968; CI :(1.508-5.843). (Table 4).

5.1 Pressure ulcer prevention knowledge and practices of nurses working in the hospitals

Pressure ulcer avoidance is a sign of high-quality treatment. The development and prevention of pressure ulcers are significantly impacted by nursing care. Thus, one important result that nurses should be aware of is pressure ulcers (Lyder and Ayello, 2005). So this study was aimed to assess nurse’s knowledge and practice on prevention of pressure ulcers and its associated factors in selected hospitals in southern Ethiopia.

In this study, 61.8 % of the participants were found to have good knowledge. This finding was similar to the studies reported in the Afghanistan(58.2,) (Muhammad et al., 2017), Brazil 63.4) (Souza Galvão et al., 2017), Nepal (65.66) (Hu, Sae-Sia and Kitrungrote, 2021), Australia(64.9) (Fulbrook, Lawrence and Miles, 2019), china 65.8% (Hu, Sae-Sia and Kitrungrote, 2021).The finding also resembles the studies from Dire Dawa 56.60 (Getie et al., 2020), Gurage (Tesfa Mengist et al., 2022) and Addis Ababa 67.3% (Dilie and Mengistu, 2015).

The nurse’s level of knowledge in this report was good (Figure 4) when relatively compared to the study findings reported from Slovakia (Halász et al., 2021), Saud Arabia (Guerrero et al., 2023), Saudi journal (Tullu, 2019), turkey (yilmazer, tüzer and erciyas, 2019), Uganda, (Mwebaza et al., 2014), UMgungundlovu District in South Africa, (Malinga and Dlungwane, 2020) show that nurses have poor knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention.

Similarly, the levels of knowledge were poor in the studies conducted in Federally Administered Hospitals in Addis Ababa (Dilie and Mengistu, 2015), Gondar University Hospital (Nuru et al., 2015), Hawassa University comprehensive specialized hospital (Muhammed et al., 2020b), Wolaita sodo university (Awoke et al., 2022), and public hospitals in Wollega (Ebi, Hirko and Mijena, 2019) relative to this study finding.

The discrepancy may also be caused by higher educational attainment of healthcare professionals (qualification), as well as better sources of information, scientific proof, and study findings.

According to this study, the levels of pressure ulcer prevention practices have been good, scored above the mean level (Figure 3). This finding was consistent with the study conducted in Bangladesh (Reza et al., 2020) Gurage, (Tesfa Mengist et al., 2022) and Addis Ababa (Dilie and Mengistu, 2015). Also, the study finding was similar to studies in South Africa (Malinga and Dlungwane, 2020), Kenya (Njau, Mwenda and Njoroge, 2018), Gondar University, (Nuru et al., 2015) Harare regional state and Dire Dawa (Getie et al., 2020).

While studies conducted in Sweden (Gunningberg et al., 2015), Uganda (Mwebaza et al., 2014), Afghanistan (Muhammad et al., 2017), Indian (Sawant and Shinde, 2017), Saud (Guerrero et al., 2023), Egypt (‘Nurses’ knowledge of prevention and management of pressure ulcer at a Health Insurance Hospital in Alexandria’, 2011), Tigray (Berihu et al., 2020),Addis Ababa (Werku Etafa, Ebi; Zeleke Argaw, Menji; Belachew Melese, 2017), Wolaita Sodo (Awoke et al., 2022) had poor pressure ulcer prevention practices relative to this study finding (Figure 2), which was good pressure ulcer prevention practices.

The difference may be attributed to nurses’ high level of expertise and growing body of scientific information, as well as their use of pressure ulcer prevention recommendations.

5.2 Factors associated with pressure ulcer prevention knowledge and practices of nurses

Nurses having good knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention were 6.9 times more likely to have good pressure ulcer prevention practices than nurses who have a poor level of knowledge (Table 5). This output was mimicked with the studies conducted in Bangladesh (Online et al., 2020), South Africa (Malinga and Dlungwane, 2020), Kenya (Njau, Mwenda and Njoroge, 2018), Borno State in Nigeria (Uba et al., 2015).

The result is also similar to the reports displayed in UMgungundlovu District in South Africa, (Tesfa Mengist et al., 2022) Addis Ababa (Dilie and Mengistu, 2015), Harari regional state Dire Dawa city administration hospital (Getie et al., 2020). Knowledge is the lowest level of learning outcome that would produce the highest level of learning outcome; practices or skills might be the possible reason. The reason might be due to the nurse having good knowledge and gaining enough skill during their clinical attachment.

Using pressure ulcer prevention guidelines was significantly associated with pressure ulcer prevention knowledge and practice of nurses, which was 2.6 times having a good knowledge level than nurses who were not using pressure ulcer prevention guidelines (Table 4). This result was similar to the studies reported from Australia (Fulbrook, Lawrence and Miles, 2019), German (Hoviattalab et al., 2014), South Africa (Malinga and Dlungwane, 2020) Embu in Kenya, (Njau, Mwenda and Njoroge, 2018) and Addis Ababa (Dilie and Mengistu, 2015).

The result is also similar to reports in Federal Hospitals in Addis Ababa (Werku Etafa, Ebi; Zeleke Argaw, Menji; Belachew Melese, 2017) and Wollega (Ebi, Hirko and Mijena, 2019), Ethiopia. The reason might be due to the use of guidelines used as a direct source of information and hold sets of systematic procedures that were expected from nurses for pressure ulcer prevention and having good knowledge.

Respondents who were satisfied with the nursing leadership had good practice as compared to those who were not. This result was similar to the study displayed in Gondar northern Ethiopia (Nuru et al., 2015). Possible reason for this result might be nurses who are satisfied with the nursing leadership are happier on their working environment, so that they are motivated to invest all their knowledge, skills and experience on practices related to prevention of pressure ulcer.

Nurses who received formal training on pressure ulcer prevention were 2.6 times having a good knowledge, and practice level than who did not receive formal training on pressure ulcer prevention. Similarly in studies conducted in Swedish, (Gunningberg et al., 2015) and university of Gondar in northern Ethiopia (Nuru et al., 2015); revealed that nurses who had training were more knowledgeable than those who did not. This might be due to the fact that training increases the possibility of the trainees to get up to date information about pressure ulcer related preventions.

Nurses with work experience of greater than five years were 3.5 times having good knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention than nurses work experience of one to two years.

Similar finding was reported in study conducted in Nigeria (Ikpi, Etita and Owan, 2019); where years of experience were significantly associated with clinical practice and knowledge and Gondar University in northern Ethiopia (Nuru et al., 2015).

Other study done in Spain on Nurses’ knowledge and clinical practice of pressure ulcer care revealed that, the greater the working experience the higher the knowledge gained (Pancorbo-hidalgo, Garcı and Lo, 2007). The reason might be nurses with more years of working experience have more exposure to work with different professionals in their clinical service so that they can learn from their coworker’s experience. Also since they have more prolonged exposure to patient care, they have greater probability to become skilled at how to prevent pressure ulcer even from their own mistakes as compared to those who have less years of working experience.

This study found that nurses being married were significantly associated with pressure ulcer prevention knowledge, with relatively 58% less likely to having good pressure ulcer prevention knowledge than being single (Table 4). There were no similar studies with this finding. Being married is more associated with the knowledge of nurses than nurses being single, this difference may be caused by social challenges in day-to-day activities and spending more time with children, which can hinder or interfere with married nurse practitioners’ clinical practices and workplace knowledge.

For Health Professionals

The health professionals who work in inpatient department ought to keep up their pressure ulcer prevention practice and knowledge with updated guidelines.

Married health professionals should updated their knowledge of pressure sore prevention as hospital guidelines to improve knowledge in pressure ulcer prevention.

For Hospital Administrators and Regional Health Bureaus

The health managers should continue giving capacity building through continuous professional development and develop and distribute updated guidelines to the hospitals, which would enhance the pressure ulcer prevention knowledge and practices of nurses.

In order to improve nurse’s knowledge in pressure ulcer prevention needs to be conducted by giving priority for married nurses is the primary points to enhance nurses’ knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention.

For future researchers

Further research on using observational studies is needed to determine the actual rather than the perceived practice and knowledge to PU prevention.