Abstract
Resolving the ambivalence between immediate cravings and long-term consequences is a key target of communication-based interventions toward behavioral change, such as motivational interviewing. Here, we aimed to understand how this ambivalence influences food preference formation and its neural mechanism. Eighty-five participants with varying body mass indices and food addiction-like symptoms underwent a motivational interviewing session during which they formulated personal reasons for (i.e., change talk) and against (i.e., sustain talk) changing their current eating habits. One week later, they listened to their statements when rating how much they wanted to eat various food items for real at the end of the experiment while their brain activation was measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Food choices were healthier when participants had listened to their change talk statements and more based on taste following sustain talk statements. This effect was stronger in participants with overweight and obesity and the more food addiction-like symptoms they displayed in their everyday life eating habits. On the neural level, participants with overweight and obesity also showed stronger functional connectivity between the ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at time of food choice following a change compared to a sustain talk statement. On the contrary, participants with normal to overweight displayed stronger neural craving responses when making their food choices following sustain talk. These findings indicate that shifting between changing and sustaining unhealthy eating habits biases food preference formation and its encoding in neural pathways linked to valuation, cognitive control and craving as a function of weight status.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT05101863
Funding Statement
This project was funded by a grant provided by the Foundation NRJ, Institute de France (1901001NA). It has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska Curie grant agreement No 945298, and from the Paris Region under the Paris Region fellowship Programme. LK acknowledges funding from an ERC Starting Grant (SOCIALCRAVING, 101041087). However, the views and opinions expressed are those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible. The funders had no role in study design, data analysis, manuscript preparation, or publication decisions.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by local ethics committees, specifically the Comité de Protection des Personnes (CPP) Est III (n°19.12.05) and the Comité de Protection des Personnes (CPP) Île-de-France II (n°20.11.24.38405).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Raw behavioral data cannot be shared due to GPDR requirements. Metadata for figures are shared on the study's OSF website: https://osf.io/4adr3/.
