Abstract
Background Health Passports (HPs) are paper-based, patient-held records used in Malawi to document key details about the health condition of a patient and the care provided during medical visits.
Aim This paper assessed their use and effectiveness within the health data ecosystem, and their impact on patient care.
Setting The study setting was facilities in the Zomba District, Malawi.
Methods We undertook a descriptive exploratory qualitative study to determine the practices for data recording used by health care professionals and the importance placed on HPs by patients and professionals. Pages from completed HPs were analysed to extract practices for recording case presentation, diagnosis, medication.
Results Despite their significance, there was a deterioration in their use. HPs are mainly used in government clinics and for the poorer segment of the population which does not have access to private healthcare and insurance. The rural population is also affected by deteriorating literacy and health infrastructure. Inadequate practices in recording patient notes negatively affected their effectiveness as source of information for patients and health professionals.
Conclusion There is a need for health policies and systems to recognise the importance of HPs and direct efforts to support their effective use. Handwritten HPs have great potential if the clarity and consistency of the written communications is improved. Guidelines for record keeping are needed to help improve the effectiveness of HPs so that they work with existing laws for the benefit of patients and professionals.
Contribution This study contributes to an under-researched area for determining the effectiveness of patient-held records in LMICs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the Welcome Trust, Grant No. 224834 awarded to Amelia Taylor at the Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences, INSPIRE project.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Research Committee of the Zomba DHO (ZA/DC/ADMIN/15/02/2024). All participants were sent an invitation clearly explaining the purpose of the FGD and gave their consent in writing.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. The data is kept in a repository on the Open Science Framework ofs.io.
- Abbreviations
- ART
- An&retroviral therapy
- EHRs
- Electronic Health Records
- FGD
- Focus Group Discussion
- HMIS
- Health Management Informa&on Systems HPs Health Passports
- LMIC
- Lower and Middle Income Countries
- MSTG
- Malawi Standards for Treatments Guidelines
- NHIS
- Na&onal Health Informa&on System Policy
- OPD
- Out-pa&ents department
