ABSTRACT
Introduction Better nutrition is a priority in African countries like Rwanda with high prevalence of undernutrition and growing rates of obesity. Since public health insurance does not cover meals, vulnerable hospital inpatients are at risk of deficiency. We assessed the nutrition, health, and wellbeing effects of providing meals through the Gemura hospital feeding program.
Methods We tested outcomes of the intervention in four public hospitals on inpatients (n=794). The primary outcome of nutritional status as body mass index (BMI) was measured at admission and discharge. Additional data collected included daily food intake, recovery as measured in length of stay (LOS), patient costs of care, HRQOL using the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L tool, and patient satisfaction based on the Net Promoter Score (NPS).
Results Mean weight in the Gemura group increased slightly (+0.6%), but the control group experienced a drop in average weight (-1.5%), with p=0.000. BMI distribution was improved generally in the Gemura group compared to controls, with the odds of being malnourished (BMI<18.5) at endline 9% greater in the control group (OR 1.09, p=0.000). LOS was longer in the Gemura group (8.35 days) than in control (4.81) but had weak association with study arm. Intervention group participants spent on average 40% less (10,985 RWF) on food and beverages than the control group (18,290 RWF) with high significance at p=0.000, while the control group spent less on total out of pocket costs of stay. Patient satisfaction and HRQOL scores were similar, except 40% less patients reported anxiety or depression in the Gemura group.
Conclusion While further investigation is needed to assess recovery and patient-reported outcomes, improvements in nutrition, mental health, and out of pocket patient costs indicate the potential for the Gemura program to address nutrition gaps in hospital service delivery, to improve mental health, and to reduce economic barriers to care.
What is already known on this topic Malnutrition has been associated with poor hospital outcomes, but few have studied access to nutritious food as a barrier, with scant evidence from intervention studies on inpatient food access in Sub-Saharan Africa, and none in Rwanda.
What this study adds In this study, we found that providing three nutritious meals a day to hospital inpatients in Rwanda improved food intake, reduced the odds of hospital malnutrition, reduced patient out-of-pocket costs, and had a positive effect on patient perceptions of their mental health compared to a control group. This is the first intervention study of its kind in Rwanda.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy In LMIC contexts of high malnutrition, these findings may help inform considerations of including hospital nutrition access programs in public health insurance schemes or other healthcare improvement initiatives.
Competing Interest Statement
SW received payment of consulting fees from SolidAfrica during the study period for study contribution and other projects for reimbursement of study related travel and for article processing charges. EM received payment of consulting fees from SolidAfrica during the study period for contribution to the study. MG and LN were employees of SolidAfrica before during and after the study.
Clinical Trial
NCT06852885
Funding Statement
This study was funded by nonprofit organization Solid'Africa.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Rwanda National Research Ethics Committee of the Rwanda Ministry of Health gave ethical approval for this work under RNEC80/2024 on 12 April 2024.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
