Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly playing a crucial role in modern medicine, particularly in clinical decision support. This study compares the performance of two OpenAI reasoning models, o3-mini and o3-mini-high, in answering 900 pediatric clinical questions derived from the MedQA-USMLE dataset. The evaluation focuses on accuracy, response time, and consistency to determine their effectiveness in pediatric diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making. The results indicate that o3-mini-high achieves a higher accuracy (90.55% vs. 88.3%) and faster response times (64.63 seconds vs. 71.63 seconds) compared to o3-mini. The chi-square test confirmed that these differences are statistically significant (X2 = 328.9675, p < 0.00001)). Error analysis revealed that o3-mini-high corrected more errors from o3-mini than vice versa, but both models shared 61 common errors, suggesting intrinsic limitations in training data or model architecture. Additionally, accessibility differences between the models were considered. While DeepSeek-R1, evaluated in a previous study, offers unrestricted free access, OpenAI’s o3 models have message limitations, potentially influencing their suitability in resource-constrained environments. Future improvements should aim at reducing shared errors, optimizing o3-mini’s accuracy while maintaining efficiency, and refining o3-mini-high for enhanced performance. Implementing an ensemble approach that leverages both models’ strengths could provide a more robust AI-driven clinical decision support system, particularly in time-sensitive pediatric scenarios such as emergency care and neonatal intensive care units.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
