Abstract
Haptic feedback has demonstrated utility in traditional prosthetic devices, however, it is unclear to what extent haptic feedback improves functionality in an anthropomorphic agonist/antagonist tendon-actuated design. We investigate the impact of state-based haptic feedback in an agonist/antagonist tendon-driven anthropomorphic prosthesis by proportionally mapping haptic sensations of the tension in the tendons during actuation. N=24 participants without limb loss were recruited to perform a grasp and transfer task using a mock prosthesis across three conditions: no haptic feedback, skin stretch feedback, and vibrotactile feedback. We hypothesized that haptic feedback of tendon tension would improve task performance and that skin-stretch feedback would outperform the vibrotactile condition due to the modality-matched similarities of tension and stretch. Results highlight that vibrotactile feedback resulted in significantly more object transfers than skin stretch feedback or no feedback. However, skin stretch feedback had a significantly higher transfer efficiency than vibrotactile feedback, demonstrating that different haptic modalities uniquely affect task performance. This study is the first to demonstrate that feedback of tendon tension in a tendon-driven prosthesis has significant utility and improves task performance. It establishes a need for further exploration of haptic integration in tendon-actuated systems given their support for limb impedance modulation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant #2325994)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Johns Hopkins Medicine IRB #00147458 of Johns Hopkins University gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant #2325994).
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
