Abstract
Background Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic condition characterized by inflammation, immune dysregulation, and debilitating pain.
Aim This study investigates soluble immune checkpoints (sICPs) and their associations with inflammatory mediators, immune cell profiles, autoantibodies, and clinical outcomes in SCD.
Method Peripheral blood samples from 50 SCD patients and 40 demographic-matched healthy controls (HCs) were analyzed for 37 sICPs, 80 inflammatory mediators, and 18 autoantibodies using multiplex assays, alongside immune cell profiles via flow cytometry. Pain and quality of life (QoL) were assessed through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Results Twenty-three sICPs, including arginase-1, BTLA, CD27, CD28, CD47, CD80, CD96, CD134, CD137, CD152, GITR, HVEM, IDO, LAG-3, MICA, MICB, Nectin-2, PD-1, Siglec-7, Siglec-9, TIM-3, TIMD-4, and VISTA, were significantly elevated in SCD patients compared to HCs. These sICPs correlated with multiple proinflammatory mediators (e.g., IL-18), autoantibodies (e.g., MPO), and immune cell activation markers (e.g., CD38/HLA-DR on CD8 T cells). Notably, CD28, CD152, HVEM, and VISTA were strongly associated with systemic inflammation and immune cell activation, while BTLA, LAG-3, PD-1, and CD80 correlated with pain and anxiety scores and QoL.
Conclusion This study highlights complex interactions between sICPs, immune activation, inflammation, and clinical outcomes in SCD, underscoring their potential as biomarkers or therapeutic targets to alleviate inflammation and improve QoL in this challenging clinical population.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT05045820
Funding Statement
This work was supported by NIH K99/R00 award (Grant # 5R00AT010012.) and Indiana University Health-Indiana University School of Medicine Strategic Research Initiative funding to Y.W. This work was also supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1035237 to Q.Y.).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of Indiana University gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
