ABSTRACT
Objective Ableism is driven by attitudes that influence behaviors and decisions toward people with disabilities. To assess whether these attitudes vary by occupation, we compared the preferences for people with or without physical disabilities between healthcare practitioners and individuals in other professions.
Methods Data from 213,191 participants collected through Project Implicit were analyzed, including 6445 clinicians, 3482 rehabilitation assistants, and 203,264 individuals in other occupations. Implicit attitudes were assessed using D-scores derived from the Implicit Association Test. Explicit attitudes were assessed using a Likert scale. Multiple linear regression models were conducted to examine the association between occupation groups and attitudes toward people with and without physical disabilities, while controlling for demographic variables.
Results Healthcare practitioners showed both an implicit and explicit preference for people without physical disabilities. Equivalence tests showed that implicit attitudes of clinicians and rehabilitation assistants were equivalent to those in other occupations. Clinicians had less favorable explicit attitudes toward people with physical disabilities, whereas rehabilitation assistants had more favorable ones. Older age, male sex, and no personal experience of disability were associated with less favorable attitudes toward people with physical disabilities. Associations with education, race, geographic region, and year of data collection were also observed.
Conclusions This study provides evidence of attitudes against people with physical disabilities among healthcare practitioners. Moreover, implicit attitudes of healthcare practitioners toward people with physical disabilities were not more favorable than those of other occupations; and explicit attitudes of clinicians were even less favorable.
Impact Our findings suggest that despite ongoing educational shifts toward more inclusive approaches, the longstanding framework of disability as an abnormality to be normalized may still affect healthcare practitioners. This underscores the need for continued efforts to address ableism in healthcare by promoting disability-inclusive education and training.
Disclosures None
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Matthieu P. Boisgontier is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (RGPIN-2021-03153), the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), and MITACS.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the University of Ottawa Research Ethics Board (H-02-25-11349), Canada.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This version corrects an error in the caption of Figure 3 and Figure 4.
Data Availability
The R script used to analyze the data are publicly available in Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14876870). The dataset and materials for the Implicit Association Test are available in the Project Implicit Demo Website Datasets, hosted on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Y9HIQ).