Abstract
Aim To understand how preferences and constraints of nursing staff, nurse managers and hospital directors interact and influence decisions around nurse shift patterns
Background Globally, many nursing staff have expressed intention to leave the profession and high levels of stress and burnout. Shift patterns are often cited as a key driver of negative nurse outcomes. How preferences and constraints of staff groups involved in nurse shift scheduling interact to shape decisions remains unexplored.
Design Qualitative study. We interviewed 17 nursing staff, 5 nurse managers and 6 hospital directors.
Methods Staff were recruited through 5 NHS Trusts based in the North, Midlands, East and South of England. The results were analysed using inductive and deductive framework analysis.
Results Three themes were identified that influenced nurses’ decisions for shift scheduling: 1/ Balancing Choice with Consistency, Predictability and Flexibility; 2/Adequate Rest and Recovery Between Shifts; and 3/Enjoyment and Engagement at Work. There was a meta-theme of conflicting priorities for shift scheduling between nursing staff, nurse managers and hospital directors across these three themes.
Conclusions Different priorities for shift scheduling of nursing staff, nurse managers and hospital directors created potential or actual conflict. Solutions appeared to consist of compromises where priorities of different staff groups were simultaneously upheld to an acceptable level. This occurred through collaborative interactions across staff groups.
Implications for Practice Nursing staff, nurse managers and hospital directors can facilitate choice and flexibility and navigate conflicts in nurse shift scheduling through collaborative approaches that enhance awareness and effective communication.
Reporting Method Qualitative data was reported using the EQUATOR checklist COREQ. No Patient or Public Contribution
What does this paper contribute to the wider global clinical community?
Collaborative approaches can influence conflicting priorities of staff groups in relation to nurse shift scheduling.
Staff understanding other staff priorities for nurse shift scheduling enhances awareness.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by the Academy of Medical Sciences, Springboard award.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was granted by the Health Research Authority (IRAS ID: 327884) and from the University of Southampton ethics committee (ID: 81204)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
