Abstract
Introduction Endeavors to bolster resident well-being may benefit from a greater understanding of how associated psychological states are shaped across various stages of medical education. To this end, the current study aimed to determine if perceived psychological safety and exposure to negative aspects of the hidden curriculum during medical school predicted meaning in work and imposter phenomenon among medical residents transitioning into their new programs.
Methods All incoming residents at a multi-institutional hospital organization were administered a survey link via email as part of a larger set of studies. Participants in this specific study (n = 237) completed measures assessing their perceptions of both positive and negative medical school experiences (i.e., psychological safety and hidden curriculum exposure) as well as their current feelings about themselves and their work (i.e., meaning in work and imposter phenomenon). Data collection took place during the summer of 2022.
Results Perceptions of psychological safety during the last two years of medical school were positively related to meaning in work and negatively related to imposter phenomenon among incoming residents. Perceptions of exposure to negative aspects of the hidden curriculum predicted imposter phenomenon, but no link was observed between hidden curriculum exposure and meaning in work.
Discussion Feelings related to previous learning environments (i.e., medical school) may still be relevant during the transition into residency. Next steps include exploring potential causal linkages between these variables as well as expanding the scope and operationalization of psychological states and experiences considered across time points during the medical training journey.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: all authors had financial support from HCA Healthcare for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Funding Statement
This research was supported (in whole or in part) by HCA Healthcare and/or an HCA Healthcare affiliated entity. The views expressed in this publication represent those of the authors(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of HCA Healthcare or any of its affiliated entities.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The institutional review board of HCA Healthcare gave ethical approval for this work (6/15/2022, approval number 2022-496).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
