Abstract
Introduction According to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, motor neuron disease assessment and management should be a coordinated, clinic-based, multidisciplinary team approach. However, the wellbeing, work experiences, and the alignment with national frameworks and standards of the motor neuron disease (MND) nurses and allied health professional’s workforce are severely underreported and under-researched within the literature. Therefore, this report aimed to capture the workforce and their alignment with national frameworks and standards, and to assess their experiences working as an MND health care professional.
Methods A pragmatic research paradigm and a mixed methods approach was employed using a cross-sectional questionnaire survey to collect, compare, and interpret quantitative and qualitative data points. Data was gathered under the remit of an audit and service evaluation under NHS Lothian. Demographics data and work-related characteristics were collected. Job experience and wellbeing were collected using Likert scales and open-ended questions. The level of burnout was assessed using the validated tool, the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). Compliance with national frameworks were based on the NICE Guidelines and the Scottish MND Advanced Clinical Nurse Specialist Pillars of Practice Competencies.
Results 64 HCPs completed the questionnaire, with the majority of respondents from England (54.7%) and Scotland (35.9%). Education level was mainly having a Bachelors (or equivalent) degree (40%) or a Masters (or equivalent) degree (31%), with the remaining having a diploma-based qualification (29%). The analysis revealed three key themes: the importance of the multi-disciplinary team (MDT), the roles and the level of competencies, and the benefits and challenges in providing direct care.
Discussion This report highlighted the importance of a collaborative MDT to support the needs of patients, their carers/ family members and HCPs themselves. The workforce found the flexibility, autonomy, and variety within their role beneficial where almost 80% of the respondents engaged in 8 of the 15 competencies. The benefits of providing direct care were found to be associated with feeling valued by the patients, their carers/ family members, and the core and extended MDT, and feeling satisfied about their work. The perceived challenges of providing direct care involved isolation, lack of direct funding, and a high caseload with complex needs and not enough time to provide quality care, and this was associated with 14% and 12% being at medium and high risk of burnout, respectively. It is recommended that a national competency programme or a Masters level course in MND care should be developed to maintain the quality of care, and future research should aim to evaluate the entire workforce longitudinally, address organisational barriers, and explore burnout preventative strategies to maintain a resilient workforce.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Quality Directorate of National Health Service Lothian gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
