Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Mild cognitive impairment cases affect the predictive power of Alzheimer’s disease diagnostic models using routine clinical variables

View ORCID ProfileCaitlin A. Finney, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, View ORCID ProfileArtur Shvetcov
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.04.25321694
Caitlin A. Finney
1Translational Dementia Research Group, Centre for Immunology and Allergy Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
2School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Caitlin A. Finney
  • For correspondence: caitlin.finney{at}wimr.org.au
Artur Shvetcov
1Translational Dementia Research Group, Centre for Immunology and Allergy Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
3Department of Psychological Medicine, Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia
4Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Artur Shvetcov
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Diagnostic models using primary care routine clinical variables have been limited in their ability to identify Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. In this study we sought to better understand the effect of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) on the predictive performance of AD diagnostic models. We sourced data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. CatBoost was used to assess the utility of routine clinical variables that are accessible to primary care physicians, such as hematological and blood tests and medical history, in multiclass classification between healthy controls, MCI, and AD. Our results indicated that MCI indeed affected the predictive performance of AD diagnostic models. Of three subgroups of MCI that we found, this finding was driven by a subgroup of MCI patients that likely have prodromal AD. Future research should focus on distinguishing MCI from prodromal AD as the utmost priority for improving translational AD diagnostic models for primary care physicians.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. C.A.F. is grateful for salary support from the Neil & Norma Hill Foundation, Annemarie & Arturo Gandioli-Fumagalli Foundation, Perpetual Foundation John Williams Endowment, and the Hillcrest Foundation.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The data used in this study is from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort and is available at https://ida.loni.usc.edu/.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data used in this study is from the ADNI cohort and is available at https://ida.loni.usc.edu/.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 06, 2025.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mild cognitive impairment cases affect the predictive power of Alzheimer’s disease diagnostic models using routine clinical variables
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Mild cognitive impairment cases affect the predictive power of Alzheimer’s disease diagnostic models using routine clinical variables
Caitlin A. Finney, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Artur Shvetcov
medRxiv 2025.02.04.25321694; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.04.25321694
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Mild cognitive impairment cases affect the predictive power of Alzheimer’s disease diagnostic models using routine clinical variables
Caitlin A. Finney, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Artur Shvetcov
medRxiv 2025.02.04.25321694; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.04.25321694

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neurology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (431)
  • Allergy and Immunology (757)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3298)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (365)
  • Dermatology (280)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1173)
  • Epidemiology (13385)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5158)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3276)
  • Health Policy (1143)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1193)
  • Hematology (432)
  • HIV/AIDS (1019)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14638)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (478)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (525)
  • Neurology (4930)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (886)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (728)
  • Orthopedics (282)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (544)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (551)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4218)
  • Public and Global Health (7512)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1708)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1016)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (498)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (549)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)