Abstract
Background Since the COVID-19 pandemic routine vaccination rates have dropped in Canada. Many newcomers and refugees experience significant vaccine inequities despite wide vaccine availability and COVID-19 pandemic vaccination campaigns. We aimed to investigate post-pandemic vaccine hesitancy, acceptance, and vaccine outreach strategies among newcomers’ communities.
Methods We conducted a prospective community-based-participatory research (CBPR) qualitative study with self-identified newcomers in Alberta between October 2022 - January 2023. Community Scholars, leaders representing various ethnocultural communities trained in community-engaged research conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups in English and first languages. Scholars collected and translated detailed qualitative notes and sociodemographic data with a standardized survey. Qualitative data was thematically analyzed and coded using a consensus-based approach.
Results We conducted two focus groups and five semi-structured interviews with 12 participants, 50% who identified as female and originated from the Philippines, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Mexico, Burundi, and Egypt. We identified three main themes, each with two subthemes: (1) vaccine hesitancy due to lack of reliable information and religious and cultural beliefs, (2) access to COVID-19 vaccines and information, and (3) vaccine acceptance as voluntary or coerced. Employer mandated vaccination emerged as a critical issue with potential long-term negative public health implications, leading to vaccine regret and loss of trust of public health authorities and healthcare systems.
Conclusion During population-wide COVID-19 vaccination campaigns newcomers perceived their communities’ circumstances were overlooked, potentially increasing vaccine hesitancy. Perceived coercive vaccination policies had unintended negative public health consequences. These findings may help inform future emergency and routine public health vaccination policies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant no. 477172
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval: This study was approved by the University of Calgary, Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (CHREB) REB21-2060.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Study data are available upon request.
