Abstract
Background Multimorbidity, defined as the co-occurrence of two or more chronic conditions in an individual, has emerged as a worldwide public health concern contributing to mortality and morbidity. With a prevalence estimated at 37% globally, this complex health phenomenon is increasingly affecting populations as they age. Despite the growing burden of multimorbidity, the development and implementation of interventions published by scholars are still in their early stages with significant variability in strategies and outcomes.
Objectives The review aims to synthesize interventions designed to manage and mitigate multimorbidity and explore a range of approaches, including pharmacological treatments, lifestyle modifications, care coordination models, and technological innovations.
Methods The scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. It included about 1,227,906 individuals with multimorbidity, with 199,413 being male (16.2%) and 1,028,493 (83.8%) female participants. Multimorbidity interventions were defined as strategies or programs designed to manage and improve the health and quality of life of individuals with multiple chronic conditions.
Results The final analysis included 101 articles from 3119 published between 2012 and 2024. Themes on the need for lifestyle and behavioural interventions, patient empowerment and engagement, multimorbidity management, health integration, pharmacotherapy optimization, community and policy interventions, healthcare system improvements, technology and digital health, as well as research and evidence-based practice interventions, emerged.
Conclusion The reviewed literature emphasizes the necessity of multidisciplinary approaches to effectively combat the escalating pandemic of multimorbidity.
Introduction
Multimorbidity, defined as the co-occurrence of two or more chronic conditions in an individual, has emerged as a worldwide public health concern contributing to mortality and morbidity [1–3]. This complex health phenomenon is increasingly becoming prevalent (37.2% globally) affecting populations especially as they age [4,5]. Multimorbidity complicates clinical management and exacerbates health outcomes, leading to reduced quality of life, and increased health utilization and costs [6–8]. Even though the prevalence of multimorbidity is projected to remain on an upward trend, policy and research remain focused on single diseases making it difficult to prevent multimorbidity better[9,10].
Multimorbidity has been described as a ‘defining challenge’ for health systems, which are traditionally focused on single conditions[11]. This calls for effective interventions to address the multifaceted needs of patients with multimorbidity, encompassing a holistic approach that integrates medical, psychological, and social dimensions of care [12–14]. Despite the growing burden of multimorbidity, the development and implementation of interventions published by scholars are still in their early stages with significant variability in strategies and outcomes [12–14]. In addition, the application of the proposed interventions may be affected by the socioeconomic status of the respective countries.
The vast research published on multimorbidity recommends possible interventions that scientists and policymakers could adopt [6,15,16]. This review aims to synthesize interventions designed to manage and mitigate multimorbidity and explore a range of approaches, including pharmacological treatments, lifestyle modifications, care coordination models, and technological innovations.
Background on Multimorbidity Interventions
Multimorbidity interventions are defined as strategies or programs designed to manage and improve individuals’ health and quality of life with multiple chronic conditions[15]. Given the challenge of managing several chronic illnesses simultaneously, multimorbidity management has placed a greater emphasis on patient-centred interventions. Integrated care approaches, which promote collaboration across interdisciplinary teams to address patients’ medical, social, and psychological needs holistically, are among the most crucial strategies. Patient empowerment via self-management measures, such as education on medication adherence and lifestyle changes, improves results and lessens the burden of therapy. Remote monitoring and telemedicine are two examples of technology-based therapies that have demonstrated potential in improving accessibility and continuity of care, especially for underprivileged populations. To make sure that therapies meet patients’ objectives and lower the hazards of polypharmacy (such as adverse drug interactions), these interventions are supplemented by shared decision-making frameworks and systematic medication reviews [15,17,18].
Methods
This scoping review was conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist (see supplementary file)[19]. To ensure transparency, the authors searched multiple databases for similar scoping reviews to avoid duplication. Without such a review, the authors continued with the scoping review.
Search strategy
To reduce selection bias, three (3) authors (K.P.S., R.G.M., and C.B.N.), systematically searched for relevant studies from 1 April 2024 to 30 June 2024. About five electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Cochrane and Scopus) were searched for relevant evidence. The search strategy was first drafted and tested using PubMed. This was further adapted to the syntax and subject headings of all other databases searched in the study. Keywords used in the search were “Multimorbidity”, “Multiple chronic conditions”, and “Interventions”. In addition, reference lists of all eligible articles identified were searched and screened for additional relevant studies. The search strategy for PubMed has been included in the supplementary file as an example.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Studies were reviewed against pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria for eligibility. Peer-reviewed studies were included if they investigated multimorbidity interventions or proposed multimorbidity interventions in their recommendations, written in English and not reviews. Studies were excluded if they focused on single morbidity, did not have multimorbidity interventions, were not written in English and were reviewed. The present review did not have age and type of multimorbidity restrictions.
Study selection
Selection and inclusion of papers for this review involved a two-stage process: screening of abstracts and titles; and full-text reading to select eligible papers for final inclusion. Three independent reviewers (K.P.S., R.G.M., and C.B.N.) conducted the selection process through each stage of the review. After the database search, the results were exported to Zotero, a bibliographic management software, where duplicates were removed. After removing the duplicates, the reviewers applied the pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria and independently assessed the titles and abstracts for full-text review eligibility. Following this process, articles were selected for full-text screening. Again, the reviewers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria and independently assessed the full-text articles. After each stage of the selection process, the reviewers compared results and reached a consensus, with a fourth reviewer and a fifth reviewer serving as a tie-break in situations where the three reviewers failed to reach an agreement.
Data extraction
Relevant data were extracted from eligible articles using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. These included author name, date of publication, country of study; the main objective of the study; study design and participants, sample size and gender distribution.
Results
Out of a pool of 3119 articles identified from the database, full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. About 1400 articles were excluded due to not being relevant to the present review (n = 280), lack of multimorbidity interventions (n = 868), focus on single morbidity (n = 196) and reviews (n = 56) (Figure 1). The final analysis included 101 articles from 3119 published between 2012 and 2024. The included studies comprised various research designs: 54 Randomized controlled trials (53.5%), 32 cross-sectional (32.7%) and six cohorts (5.9%). Longitudinal, qualitative and population-based studies contributed about 2.9% respectively. The sample sizes of these studies ranged from 6 to 712,822 participants. In total, 1,227,906 individuals with multimorbidity participated in these studies, with 199,413 being male (16.2%) and 1,028,493 (83.8%) female participants. Three articles did not report sample size while 12 studies reported total sample size but not gender distribution. The geographical distribution of these studies was as follows: About 27 studies were from Africa, 5 Asia, 2 Australia, 30 Europe and 15 North America. About 19 of the included studies were multinational studies. Figure 2 presents percentages of studies from each continent and percentages of individual countries within respective continents. Figure 3. Presents the distribution of interventions in the 101 studies included in the review, stratified by countries’ financial status. Furthermore, table S1 presents a summary of the included studies’ characteristics.
Study selection flow diagram
Distribution of countries and continents from which included studies were conducted. A: Shows continental distribution with Europe and Africa having the highest parentage. B and D: represent the distribution by country for Africa and Europe. C: country distribution for North America, Asia and Australia.
Distribution of interventions in the 101 studies included in the review, stratified by countries’ financial status. (A) Low income (B) Upper-Middle-Income (C) High-Income (D) Global. upSet plot generated using Rstudio.
Upon thematic analysis, this scoping and review identified 9 themes summarized in Table 2.
Lifestyle and Behavioural Interventions
Physical activity
Lifestyle changes were identified as a positive factor in managing multimorbidity. About eleven (11) studies indicated that physical activity and exercise programs were important among individuals with multimorbidity [22,24,30,33–35,39,41,50,57,99]. This was to be done by encouraging individuals with multimorbidity to engage in regular exercise, which may be incorporated into community programs. In addition, the provision of individual counselling, as well as access to fitness facilities and organized activities, were noted to have potential benefits for individuals with multimorbidity. Designing structured exercise programs, tailored for individual capabilities and extend of multimorbidity. Some studies suggested cost-effective exercise programs consisting of aerobics [24,57] and low-volume cycling to improve body composition [30]. Participating in brisk walking for more than 175 minutes per week also had a positive impact on inducing weight loss [34].
Smoking Cessation, alcohol reduction and Weight Management
Lifestyle interventions such as quitting smoking dietary advice reducing alcohol consumption we found in several studies to have a positive impact on the management of multimorbidity [22,33,41,50,61,70,79,88]. Interventions such as offering support and resources for quitting smoking, implementing weight management programs that include dietary advice and physical activity, programs to reduce alcohol consumption and community-based initiatives to promote overall wellness were suggested. One study reported that reducing caloric intake and increasing physical activity to induce weight loss to average >7% at year 1 and maintaining this over time could lessen the burden of multimorbidity [35].
Patient Empowerment and Engagement
Self-Management Skills Training
Several studies reported the importance of teaching patients skills to manage individual chronic health conditions independently and offering programs that build confidence and competence in self-care and self-monitoring to adjust lifestyle habits and make healthy lifestyle choices [24,32,39,46,51,53,55,56,60,62,95]. Mbokazi et al., further highlighted the need to incorporate and recognize cultural norms in interventions need such as the role that Ubuntu plays for people living with multimorbidity in South Africa and consider how existing social networks can be strengthened to enhance self-management capacity [62]. This is especially true in a changing healthcare landscape where patients are expected to take more responsibility for their health. Tomita et al., further recommend a restructure of the social welfare framework and establish culturally sensitive healthcare systems capable of managing multimorbidity amidst the unprecedented urbanization occurring in Tanzania [106]. Information material for patients to increase self-management abilities and reduce language barriers and difficulties of comprehension was found useful in achieving this intervention [45,46]. In addition, addressing key non-disease-specific self-management challenges and themes (mastering emotions, managing treatments, and communication within health care) [51]. Developing accessible educational resources for patients on various health topics. Providing printed and digital materials to support patient learning. Organizing group sessions where patients can learn and practice self-management skills. Facilitating peer support and sharing of experiences.
Assisting patients with goal setting and prioritization, peer support, health services navigation
Helping patients set realistic and achievable health goals and prioritizing interventions based on what is important to the patient [39,41,101]. Goal setting and prioritization based on patient preferences should include interventions to support patient self-management used in the groups including self-management, fatigue and energy management, managing stress, anxiety, and maintaining mental health and well-being, keeping physically active, healthy eating, managing medications, effective communication strategies, and goal setting [39]. In addition, facilitating peer support groups where patients can share experiences and advice was found to be necessary for patient empowerment and engagement [39]. Furthermore, Garvey et al. pointed out the importance of helping patients with multimorbidity to navigate the healthcare system and provide them with guidance on how to access services and coordinated care by employing health navigators services [31]. Health navigators are professionals who can assist individuals with multimorbidity to overcome factors that may prevent them from accessing healthcare (e.g. financial, transportation, knowledge-based skills, and complex medical systems) to help them manage and cope with disease-related symptoms and health problems [31].
Multimorbidity Management
Multidisciplinary and multi-sectoral collaboration and support in healthcare systems
Establishing integrated care pathways that connect various healthcare providers and services as well as engaging social services, community organizations, and policymakers in comprehensive care plans [21,25,49,54]. This ensures continuity of care across different settings and specialities and facilitates teamwork among healthcare professionals from various disciplines thus encouraging shared decision-making and team-based care [21,25,49,54]. Multi-sectoral interventions are required beyond the healthcare sector to reduce the impact of NCDs on health systems and broader societal development [49].
Patient-centred Care
Focusing on the individual needs and preferences of patients, implementing personalized care plans that address multiple health conditions, restructuring healthcare delivery models to be more efficient and patient-centred and implementing care teams and case management approaches [43,77,86,105,116]. The current models of health care delivery need to be re-examined and patient-centred models of integration evaluated including bidirectional screening of commonly co-morbid conditions in routine clinical practice [77]. A cost-effective and patient-centred approach to the treatment and care of multiple comorbidities is required in treating multimorbidity [43,105].
Preventive Strategies for chronic disease and modifiable risk factor
Several studies highlighted the need for prevention and early intervention for chronic diseases including regular monitoring and management to prevent complications [25,84,98,99,118]. Prevention initiatives tailored to non-communicable diseases with a special target to diseases and health conditions that have the most detrimental effects on health-related quality of life [98]. Affordable, broad-scale interventions, such as promoting healthy lifestyles, preventing and managing chronic conditions, and subsequently, multimorbidity [99]. In addition, other studies reported the need to increase activities and expand measures to reduce the modifiable risk factors that are driving multi-morbidity prevalence [21,25,35,37,69,91]. Concerted efforts to develop strategies for the planning, prevention and management of modifiable risk factors that drive the high prevalence of multimorbidity including monitoring of cardiometabolic risk factors (lipids, HbA1c, blood pressure) [35,69].
Mental Health Integration
Integrating mental health screening and treatment along with collaborative care for mental health and physical conditions
Implementing models of care that integrate mental health services with primary care using team-based approaches to manage co-existing mental and physical health conditions [29,32,39,41,72,75,81,99,112]. This is because mental health conditions tend to affect the treatment outcomes of patients with multimorbidity. This can be done by providing access to therapies like cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and encouraging patients to track their mental health symptoms and triggers. Routine screening for depression and anxiety in patients with multimorbidity and offering treatment options that address both mental and physical health needs. Oh et al., reported the need for interventions aimed at minimizing distress, which has been associated with a lower adherence to treatment, leading to worsening of disease severity and outcomes. Raising awareness on distress and related mental health problems and promoting utilization of mental health care among people with multimorbidity [75].
Pharmacotherapy Optimization
Medication Reviews
Several studies highlighted the importance of regular comprehensive reviews of patient medications to ensure appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety with the aims of identifying and discontinuing potentially inappropriate medications to reduce significant polypharmacy by de-prescription of unnecessary medicines [44,46,53,54,65,66,107]. Medication reviews also increase expert knowledge and feasibility of instruments for systematic medication reviews, and implementation of an integrated healthcare model for multimorbid patients based on improving communication between primary care and hospital professionals [44,46,53,54,65,66,107]. Additionally, the studies highlighted the need to perform a brown bag medication review and record any problems identified and, assess and record patients’ priorities for treatment [44,46,53,54,65,66,107].
Use of software-based tools and clinical decision support systems
Utilizing tools like STOPP (Screening Tool for Older People’s Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert to the Right Treatment) criteria to guide prescribing practices and implementing clinical decision support systems that incorporate these criteria [20,44,48,93,94]. This assists in reducing inappropriate prescribing through, systematic medication and predicting adverse medication effects, advising safe and appropriate therapy using and monitoring clinically relevant interactions and dosing[20]. Factors such as Structured History taking of Medication use (SHiM) and collection of patient data including medical conditions, laboratory data and clinical parameters, digitalize screening of pharmacotherapy through a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) should be incorporated to detect potential overuse, underuse, and misuse of drugs [44]. The use of software-based tools and clinical decision support systems assist in improvements in medication reconciliation across healthcare settings to avoid unintentional re-prescription of medication [20,44,48,93,94].
Community and Policy Interventions
Policy interventions for physical activity infrastructure and community engagement programs
About seven (7) articles reported the need to develop public health policies that seek to promote the construction of recreational facilities to promote and facilitate physical activity [23,25,31,39,62,87,117]. In addition, the importance of community engagement events and programs that promote health and well-being, and foster social connections and support networks were highlighted as probable interventions [23,25,31,39,62,87,117]. Furthermore, the studies highlighted the need to address social determinants of health through community-based approaches [23,25,31,39,62,87,117].
Financial Assistance
Factors such as lack of financial means were also found to play a role in the management or lack thereof of multimorbidity. As an intervention, some studies therefore recommended the need to offer financial support for individuals with multimorbidity to eliminate the financial barrier they face in accessing health services [23,80,110].
Healthcare System Improvements
Enhancing Communication between primary care and hospitals
The present review found that there remained a lack of communication between healthcare providers in hospitals, which needs to be improved through the incorporation of health information technology and integrated care systems that connect primary, secondary, and tertiary care to facilitate communication between health professionals and enhance coordination between various levels of care is necessary [39,51,53].
Strengthening Capacity and Training for Healthcare Workers
Providing ongoing education and training for healthcare workers for multimorbidity management. Offering specialized training for healthcare providers on managing multimorbidity. Conducting workshops and seminars to enhance clinical skills [30,36,45,63,117].
Technology and digital health
Some studies revealed the need for technology and digital health in the management of multimorbidity [25,112,115]. This includes internet-based self-management programs, telehealth and telephone nursing support, electronic registries and tracking systems and the use of mobile apps for patient engagement [25,112,115]. Some studies promoted the use of technology and digital health to offer patients online platforms to learn about and manage multimorbidity [25,112,115]. This further provides healthcare workers with the opportunity to track and monitor health metrics, remote consultations and follow-ups, and monitor health outcomes. Creating mobile applications that support patient engagement and self-management [25,112,115].
Research and Evidence-Based Practice
Conducting long-term research to investigate underlying mechanisms and risk factors to understand the causes and risk factors for multimorbidity, exploring the interactions between different health conditions, tracking the progression and impact of multimorbidity and analyzing data to inform future healthcare practices [6,42,61,63,69,74,77,80,82,85,88,100,102,103,109]. Creating and testing new approaches to managing multimorbidity. Focusing on interventions that are patient-centred and effective [6,42,61,63,69,74,77,80,82,85,88,100,102,103,109]. Assessing the effectiveness of integrated care models. Using evidence to refine and improve care delivery systems [6,42,61,63,69,74,77,80,82,85,88,100,102,103,109].
Discussion
This review aimed to synthesize interventions designed to manage and mitigate multimorbidity and explore a range of approaches, including pharmacological treatments, lifestyle modifications, care coordination models, and technological innovations. The results of the current review revealed the need for lifestyle and behavioural interventions, patient empowerment and engagement, multimorbidity management, health integration, pharmacotherapy optimization, community and policy interventions, healthcare system improvements, technology and digital health, as well as research and evidence-based practice interventions. The reviewed literature emphasizes the necessity of multidisciplinary approaches to effectively combat the escalating pandemic of multimorbidity.
The reviewed studies suggest the need for lifestyle changes that include physical activity targeting weight loss as well as reducing alcohol consumption and smoking cessation as a mechanism that can improve multimorbidity management [17,19,25,28–30,34,36,46,53,57,66,75,84,96]. Smoking, alcohol consumption and physical inactivity are well-known risk factors for multimorbidity [119,120]. Since the majority of people suffering from multimorbidity are older, the literature recommends exercises that include aerobics and brisk walking which have been reported to improve general body weight [51,121]. A study by Zou and colleagues reported smoking behaviour, age of initiation, frequency of daily smoking and passive smoking to increase the risk of multimorbidity [122]. The increased risk of multimorbidity among smokers can be explained by the reported implication of smoking towards the individual impact of smoking on cardiovascular risk including diabetes, heart disease and stroke morbidities [122–124].
It is worth noting that self-care plays a crucial role in the successful management of chronic diseases and multimorbidity. In the reviewed literature patient empowerment and engagement came out as one of the recommendations to combat the burden of multimorbidity [19,27,34,36,41,47,49,51,52,56,58,92,98]. Financial and educational status have been associated with the increased risk of multimorbidity, therefore the two factors will impact how patients suffering from multimorbidity manage their conditions [6,125,126]. Interventions aimed at overcoming the financial and educational barriers emerged from the reviewed literature where it was suggested that patients should be provided with culturally sensitive materials, educated on chronic conditions and management, patient-centred goal setting, and peer support [19,18,27,34,41,47,49,51,52,56,58,76,92,108]. Empowering patients with these skills and having peers who advocate for effective self-care will bring confidence in patients with multimorbidity, which will help them navigate the healthcare system. Also, the shared decision-making with patients about their medication, preferences and experiences could be beneficial to the healthcare system in pursuit of successful multimorbidity management [20,47,78,94]. A scoping review by Marzban and colleagues managed to show a positive impact of patient engagement on treatment adherence and self-care [127].
Multimorbidity is a complex phenomenon that requires more than the traditional approaches to healthcare provision. The findings of this review suggest a multidisciplinary and multi-sectoral collaboration and support in healthcare systems [21,25,49,54]. The involvement of various healthcare providers in patient care would be beneficial to the fragmented healthcare systems in that there would be shared patient-care decision-making. There’s also a need for patient-centred care which serves the needs of individuals as patients are different. Studies have shown the beneficial impact of multidisciplinary approaches in patient care [128,129]. Multimorbidity has been associated with mental health conditions, this can be due to observed reduction in quality of life, medication side effects and fear of death [130–132]. Multidisciplinary approaches aimed at integrating mental health into primary healthcare and facilitating pharmacotherapy optimization are necessary in caring for patients with multimorbidity according to the reviewed literature [24,27,34,36,39,41,49,50,61,62,68,71,77,96,110,104].
Reviewed literature suggests that medication reviews and the use of software-based tools and clinical decision support systems can achieve pharmacotherapy optimization [15,39,41,44,49,50,61,62,89,91,104]. Patients with multimorbidity are often subjected to polypharmacy, reviewed literature recommends medication reviews to reduce significant polypharmacy by de-prescription of unnecessary medicines. Models such as STOPP, START, SHiM and CDSS are reported to be promising interventions to reduce polypharmacy and monitoring prescriptions. Software-based tools and clinical decision support systems assist in improvements in medication reconciliation across healthcare settings to avoid unintentional re-prescription of medication [20,44,48,93,94].
The results of this review revealed the need for improvement in the healthcare system. This includes continuity of care and better communication between healthcare providers (primary healthcare providers and hospitals). Suggested interventions include the development of a digital system which will link the information of the patient across all platforms of care, internet-based self-management programs, telehealth and telephone nursing support, electronic registries and tracking systems and the use of mobile apps for patient engagement [25,112,115]. Implementing these systems would reduce the need to go to the healthcare facilities and queue for hours in some areas, and the cost of travelling to and from the health facilities, which are hindrances to people in extreme poverty from accessing health care. Also, the digital systems give an overview of and perspective and longitudinal health of a patient which has been reported to improve patient care [133–137].
Strengthening capacity and training for healthcare workers through ongoing specialized training on managing multimorbidity is also recommended by the reviewed literature, which is essential in medication regimens and the application of technology. The continued training will capacitate the healthcare providers and health systems to manage multimorbidity which is complex and needs different approaches than the ones already being used [138–140]. There is a need for long-term research to investigate underlying mechanisms and risk factors to understand the causes and risk factors of multimorbidity. Therefore, the data generated from long-term investigations can be used to create evidence-based policies that effectively serve the communities and reduce the burden of multimorbidity and chronic conditions [85,88,100,102,103,109].
Conclusion
This review underscores the growing complexity of multimorbidity and the urgent need for innovative and comprehensive approaches to manage it effectively. The synthesis of current interventions highlights the critical importance of lifestyle and behavioural changes, patient empowerment, and a more integrated healthcare system. By applying the recommended multidisciplinary care models, optimizing pharmacotherapy, and leveraging technology, we can improve the quality of life for those living with multiple chronic conditions. Moreover, the review revealed the value of personalized care, where the unique needs and circumstances of individuals are acknowledged and addressed.
Promoting self-care and treatment adherence requires patient empowerment via education and collaborative decision-making, particularly in regions with limited resources and educational opportunities. As we move forward, the advancement of digital health technologies and the inclusion of mental health services in primary care will be essential in tackling the complex issues surrounding multimorbidity in the future. Effective multimorbidity management requires a team effort involving legislators, patients, communities, and healthcare practitioners to build a more adaptable and durable healthcare system.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, K.P.S., and G.R.M.; Methodology K.P.S., and G.R.M.; Investigation, Methodology K.P.S., G.R.M., and C.B.N.; Validation, K.P.S., G.R.M., and C.B.N; Writing—original draft, K.P.S., G.R.M., and C.B.N; Writing—review and editing, K.P.S., G.R.M., C.B.N., CWK, TS. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The work reported herein was made possible through funding by the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) through its South African Population Research Infrastructure Network under the Nodal PhD Fellowship Programme; from funding received from the Department of Science, Technology and Innovation. The content hereof is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the SAMRC.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the DIMAMO PHRC for the support of the research.
References
- 1.↵
- 2.
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- 6.↵
- 7.
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.
- 14.↵
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- 17.↵
- 18.↵
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.↵
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- 26.
- 27.↵
- 28.↵
- 29.↵
- 30.↵
- 31.↵
- 32.↵
- 33.↵
- 34.↵
- 35.↵
- 36.↵
- 37.↵
- 38.
- 39.↵
- 40.
- 41.↵
- 42.↵
- 43.↵
- 44.↵
- 45.↵
- 46.↵
- 47.↵
- 48.↵
- 49.↵
- 50.↵
- 51.↵
- 52.↵
- 53.↵
- 54.↵
- 55.↵
- 56.↵
- 57.↵
- 58.↵
- 59.
- 60.↵
- 61.↵
- 62.↵
- 63.↵
- 64.
- 65.↵
- 66.↵
- 67.
- 68.↵
- 69.↵
- 70.↵
- 71.↵
- 72.↵
- 73.
- 74.↵
- 75.↵
- 76.↵
- 77.↵
- 78.↵
- 79.↵
- 80.↵
- 81.↵
- 82.↵
- 83.
- 84.↵
- 85.↵
- 86.↵
- 87.↵
- 88.↵
- 89.↵
- 90.
- 91.↵
- 92.↵
- 93.↵
- 94.↵
- 95.↵
- 96.↵
- 97.
- 98.↵
- 99.↵
- 100.↵
- 101.↵
- 102.↵
- 103.↵
- 104.↵
- 105.↵
- 106.↵
- 107.↵
- 108.↵
- 109.↵
- 110.↵
- 111.
- 112.↵
- 113.
- 114.
- 115.↵
- 116.↵
- 117.↵
- 118.↵
- 119.↵
- 120.↵
- 121.↵
- 122.↵
- 123.
- 124.↵
- 125.↵
- 126.↵
- 127.↵
- 128.↵
- 129.↵
- 130.↵
- 131.
- 132.↵
- 133.↵
- 134.
- 135.
- 136.
- 137.↵
- 138.↵
- 139.
- 140.↵