Abstract
Background The recorded incidence of eating disorders is elevated in people from higher socioeconomic positions, but self-reported eating disorder symptoms are more common in those from lower socioeconomic positions in cross-sectional studies. Longitudinal studies investigating the role of different socioeconomic indicators in the aetiology of a range of eating disorder symptoms might avoid biases associated with the use of clinical samples but have multiple limitations. We aimed to investigate the association between early childhood socioeconomic indicators and eating disorder symptoms across adolescence.
Method We used data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Parental income, education, occupation, and financial hardship were reported by mothers between 32 weeks of gestation and 47 months postpartum. Area-level deprivation was derived from the Office for National Statistics indicators linked to the participant’s residential post code at 32 weeks gestation. Outcomes were disordered eating (restrictive eating, binge eating, and purging), weight and shape concerns, and body dissatisfaction at age 14, 16, and 18 years. To model these associations, we used univariable and multivariable multilevel logistic and linear regression, and linear regression models.
Findings The sample included 7,824 participants (48.9% females; 3.8% minoritised ethnic background). Greater financial hardship was associated with increased odds of disordered eating (Odds Ratio= 1·06, 95%CI 1·04 to 1·10) and greater weight and shape concerns (Mean difference[MD] = 0·02, 95%CI 0·01 to 0·04) and body dissatisfaction (MD= 0·22 95%CI 0·06 to 0·37). Lower parental education was associated with 1.80 higher odds of disordered eating (95% CI 1·46 to 2·23).
Interpretation Our findings point to potential socioeconomic inequalities in eating disorder identification in clinical settings, which need to be understood and addressed. Reducing population-level socioeconomic inequalities could also aid eating disorder prevention.
Funding source Mental Health Research UK, Wellcome Trust, UK Medical Research Council
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
JSH is supported by a Mental Health Research UK PhD Scholarship. FS has been supported by a Wellcome Trust Sir Henry Wellcome Fellowship and a Wellcome Trust Career Development Award for the duration of this study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The research ethics committee of the University of Bristol and the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee provided ethical approval for this study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Research in context panel deleted
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
