ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain can be characterized by its temporal variability and evolution, affecting both pain management and treatment outcomes. While pain variability is traditionally studied over long timescales (e.g. days or weeks), few studies have explored short-term fluctuations (e.g. minutes to seconds) and their clinical relevance. This study investigated the short-term variability of chronic musculoskeletal pain across consecutive days, examining whether these fluctuations are stable, exhibit consistent temporal patterns, and relate to clinical severity. We also explored whether individuals with chronic MSK pain could predict their pain intensity on the following day, suggesting an ability to learn about their pain’s levels.
METHODS Eighty-one participants with chronic MSK pain to the back, neck, leg or arm rated their pain continuously over two days, using a smartphone-based app.
FINDINGS Results indicated that pain ratings were stable and exhibited consistent temporal patterns across days, with a temporally correlated structure. High mean pain levels were associated with lower variability, possibly reflecting a stabilized pain state. Short-term pain variability negatively correlated with clinical severity, indicating that greater variability is linked to milder pain.
IMPLICATIONS These findings highlight the importance of short-term variability as a distinct and clinically relevant feature of chronic MSK pain, with implications for personalized pain management strategies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by an MRC Career Development Award (MR/T010614/1), a UKRI Advanced Pain Discovery Platform grant (MR/W027593/1), and an EPSRC research infrastructure grant to F.M. This work was completed using resources provided by the Cambridge Tier-2 system operated by the University of Cambridge Research Computing Service (www.hpc.cam.ac.uk), funded by an EPSRC Tier-2 capital grant (EP/T022159/1).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Before the screening, all participants provided their digital informed consent, adhering to procedures approved by the Department of Engineering, Ethics Committee of the University of Cambridge
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
A GitHub code repository associated with the analysis in this project will be released upon the completion of peer review and acceptance of the paper. We have open-sourced the Psychopy-based pain monitoring task for use by the academic community.
