Abstract
Introduction Patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) suffer from severe social impairments and interpersonal problems. Social touch can provide comfort and facilitate the maintenance of social bonds, and preliminary evidence indicates a negative evaluation of social touch in patients with BPD. However, the neural mechanisms underlying aberrant touch processing in BPD and its role for social impairments are still unclear.
Methods We recruited 55 BPD patients and 31 healthy controls and used functional magnetic resonance imaging to probe neural responses to slow (i.e. C-tactile (CT)-optimal; affective) and fast (i.e. CT-suboptimal; discriminative) touch before and after four weeks of a residential dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) program. In addition to assessing BPD symptoms and interpersonal problems, we evaluated touch allowance maps and the attitude towards social touch.
Results BPD patients showed a comprehensive negative bias towards social touch before the DBT, evident in a significantly more negative attitude towards and reduced comfort zones of social touch compared to healthy controls. Moreover, reduced comfort zones of social touch were associated with more interpersonal problems. Activation in the posterior insular cortex in response to CT-optimal touch was significantly reduced and correlated with the severity of interpersonal problems in BPD patients. Despite significant improvements in overall BPD symptom load, dysfunctional social touch processing persisted after four weeks of DBT, indicating trait-like disturbances in BPD.
Conclusions An impaired insula-mediated integration of affective and sensory components of touch may constitute a clinically relevant biological signature of the complex interpersonal problems in BPD.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZN5C7
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04770038
Funding Statement
D.S. was supported by a Research pool University of Oldenburg Medical Scientists grant (FP 2020-047).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The medical ethics committee of the Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg gave ethical approval for this work (approval number 2020-101).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
