Abstract
An overreliance on proprioceptive (intrinsic) sensory input from the body, compared to visual (extrinsic) input from the environment, may underpin core features of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We developed an engaging videogame (“HaptiKart”) as a tool to examine differences in sensory-motor bias (proprioceptive vs. visual) in children and adults with ASD and whether bias correlates with age, core autism features, and intellectual ability. Eighty-one participants (33 ASD, 48 typically-developing, TD) aged 8 to 31 years played “HaptiKart,” a driving videogame with a force-feedback steering wheel that provided “steering assist” during gameplay. In separate trials, proprioceptive and visual feedback were selectively delayed, and differences in driving error between the conditions were used to calculate perceptual bias scores. Effects of autism diagnosis and age on bias scores were examined, controlling for sex, as were associations of perceptual bias with autism symptom severity (ADOS-2, SRS-2), attention-deficit symptom severity (Conners4 ADHD Total Scores) ratings, and IQ (general ability index, GAI). The ASD group exhibited significantly higher proprioceptive bias than did the TD group (p=0.002). There was a trend for decreasing proprioceptive bias with age, but no significant diagnosis-by-age interaction. Increased proprioceptive bias correlated with higher autism severity and with lower IQ, but not ADHD symptoms. HaptiKart provides a highly scalable approach for measuring sensory-motor bias, revealing that individuals with ASD show elevated proprioceptive bias, correlating with autism severity. HaptiKart’s sensory-motor bias measure may thereby serve as a digital biomarker for addressing autism heterogeneity in ways that can improve targeted intervention.
Author Summary In this study, we explored how people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may rely more on body-based (proprioceptive) senses than on visual information when interacting with their surroundings. Using a custom video game, HaptiKart, we designed a fun and engaging driving task to measure this sensory preference. Players drove a virtual car using a steering wheel that could be set to delay either visual or proprioceptive feedback, allowing us to observe how each type of feedback affects driving accuracy.
Our results showed that individuals with ASD had a stronger preference for proprioceptive feedback than those without ASD. This sensory preference was linked to greater autism symptom severity and lower IQ, suggesting that heightened reliance on body-centered feedback may contribute to learning and skill differences often seen in autism. These findings support the potential of HaptiKart as a simple, accessible tool to help clinicians better understand and address sensory biases in ASD, tailoring interventions to improve learning from visual information.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript. However, we wish to disclose that we are in the process of trademarking the name of the videogame "HaptiKart." This project is part of our ongoing research efforts to assess sensory bias in children with autism. The authors believe that this potential trademark does not influence the objectivity of the research presented in this manuscript.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by NIH/NIMH under Grants R21 MH127501 (PI: Eggebrecht) and R21 MH129899 (PI: Isik), and by NIH/NICHD under Grants P50 HD103538 (PI: Schlaggar) and the IDDRC R01 Project. Additional support came from the National Science Foundation (Grant 2124276, PI: Mostofsky), the Simons Foundation (Grant 724867, PI: Mostofsky), and The Eagles Autism Foundation (Grant WU-24-0499, PI: Eggebrecht).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval was received from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board before the study (IRB00269589).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This version of the manuscript has been revised to address reviewer concerns.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
