ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND All over the world, migrants experience inequalities in access to health care. While this issue has been amply explored among immigrants and refugees in high-income countries, there is a dart of information on the situation of in-transit migrants and asylum seekers (IMAS) in low- or middle-income countries. Since these are the main recipient countries for this population, it is important to document inequalities in access to care in this context, especially for countries such as Mexico, in which IMAS are entitled to health care in par with the general population.
OBJECTIVE to assess the inequalities in access to health care experienced by in-transit migrants in Mexico, as compared to the general population of Mexico, employing a cascade of care approach.
METHODS We analyzed data from a cross-sectional survey of IMAS in shelters in Tijuana (November 2020-April 2021, n=481), and from ENSANUT-COVID 2020, a representative survey of the general population in Mexico conducted at about the same time (unweighted n=25,959). We compared the cascade of care – the self-reported presence of health needs, whether participants sought care given the need, and whether they received care – of the two samples.
RESULTS A higher percentage of IMAS had experienced a health need in the past three months, as compared to the general population of Mexico (43.0% vs 21.9%). IMAS were less likely to seek care given the need (58.9% vs 81.8%), to receive care when they sought it (86.9% vs 97.7%), and to receive care in the public health system (19.7% vs 43.3%).
CONCLUSIONS Inequalities in access to care were apparent, even in a health system that normatively should provide care regardless of migration status. Understanding why this occurs is important, and our results represent a baseline from which to evaluate future improvements in universal health coverage in Mexico.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The IMAS study was funded by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences' Rethinking the Humanitarian Health Response to Violent Conflict Project [no grant number]; the University of California, San Francisco [no grant number]; and the San Diego Center For AIDS Research (CFAR), which is funded by the National Institutes of Health [grant number P30AI036214].
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ethics Committees of El Colegio de la Frontera Norte (no. 066-170720) and the University of California, San Diego (no. 201153) gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availability
Data from the IMAS study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author. ENSANUT is publicly available at https://ensanut.insp.mx/