ABSTRACT
Introduction Home dialysis (HoD) remains underutilized, despite evidence showing it provides comparable mortality rates to in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) while offering advantages such as improved quality of life and lower overall costs. This scoping review comprehensively evaluates the impact of public health interventions on increasing the use of HoD, including both Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) and Home Hemodialysis (HHD).
Methods Relevant studies were searched in the Web of Science, Medline, Embase, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and EconLit databases from their inception through May 2024. Studies were eligible for review if they assessed the effectiveness of public health interventions in terms of utilization and retention rates for general HoD, PD, and HHD.
Results Forty-three studies were included, with interventions categorized into three main types: educational programs, service provision improvements, and modifications to payment structures. Our findings indicate that educational interventions—aimed at enhancing knowledge about dialysis options and promoting shared decision-making among patients, families, and healthcare providers—and service provision improvements, such as assisted PD and nephrologist-performed catheter insertions, could significantly increase the initiation, utilization, and retention rates of HoD. However, the impact of payment interventions on HoD outcomes differed across different contexts.
Conclusion Education and service provision enhancements may represent the most effective public health interventions for increasing initiation, utilization, and retention rates of HoD in dialysis requiring patients. However, these findings are predominantly based on evidence from observational studies; further experimental studies with rigorous methodology are warranted to validate the effectiveness of these interventions in promoting HoD utilization.
PLAIN TEXT SUMMARY Kidney dialysis is a life-sustaining therapy that can be offered both at home and in medical centres, however, home dialysis is underutilised globally. This scoping review gathers evidence from around the world to identify and assess the effectiveness of public health interventions to improve home dialysis utilization. The interventions we found were mainly related to improving patient knowledge, redesigning service provision, or adjusting payment/reimbursement conditions. Our results suggest that educating patients about their dialysis options to support shared decision-making before they require dialysis and offering assisted peritoneal dialysis at home can help increase the number of patients starting and staying on home dialysis. However, adjusting payment and reimbursement policies showed mixed results.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Health Systems and Research Institute (HSRI), Thailand (grant number HSRI 67-067), and the National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF) through the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation (B41G670025). The funders had no role in the design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing of the report. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies. The Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP) Foundation in Thailand supports evidence-informed priority-setting and decision-making in healthcare and is funded by both national and international public agencies.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
DATA AVAILABILITY
Not applicable. This scoping review did not apply meta-analysis and only qualitatively summarized the data presented in the primary studies.
