Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Physician and Endoscopy Nurse Perspectives on Tap Water for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Survey on Support, Perceived Barriers, and Intent to Advocate

View ORCID ProfileAnthony James Goodings, View ORCID ProfileAllison Dana Chhor, View ORCID ProfileHannah Anderson, View ORCID ProfileMila Pastrak, View ORCID ProfileSten Kajitani, Matthew Schultzel, View ORCID ProfileAoife O’Sullivan, Ann-Marie Eustaceryan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.23.24317703
Anthony James Goodings
1School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anthony James Goodings
  • For correspondence: 120105136{at}umail.ucc.ie
Allison Dana Chhor
2Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Allison Dana Chhor
Hannah Anderson
1School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hannah Anderson
Mila Pastrak
1School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mila Pastrak
Sten Kajitani
1School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sten Kajitani
Matthew Schultzel
3United Medical Doctors, San Diego, United States of America;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aoife O’Sullivan
4Cork University Hospital, Ireland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aoife O’Sullivan
Ann-Marie Eustaceryan
1School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland;
5Tipperary University Hospital, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The standard water used for endoscopic irrigation is sterile water. Minimal evidence exists regarding sterile water use where there is access to clean water. The WHO has declared the climate crisis as the greatest global health crisis today; we must re-examine our practices and adapt them to promote environmental stewardship while maintaining safety.

Method and Objective We surveyed physicians and endoscopy nurses to determine their attitudes toward tap water use for irrigation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.

Results There were 88 complete responses collected from June to November 2024. The majority of respondents and endoscopy-performing consultants expressed comfort with tap water use (59% and 84%, respectively), perceived viability (62% and 68%, respectively), and an interest to implement (73% and 94%, respectively); however, discussions on the topic remained infrequent (77% and 81%, respectively). 82% of overall respondents and 93% of consultants were aware of potential cost-savings, with 69% and 87% more willing to consider tap water based on this. Respondents (60%) and consultants (73%) agree there is a lack of guidelines regarding tap water use and feel that policy barriers will hinder change (59% and 73% respectively). Overall, 59% of respondents and 73% of consultants are likely to advocate for change.

Conclusion The majority of respondents support tap water as a viable, cost-effective alternative with environmental benefits. A strong intention to advocate for change highlights the presence of potential leaders in this space. By promoting and supporting these leaders through education and institutional change, a more sustainable future for endoscopy exists.

What is already known on this topic

  • There is an urgent need to address the immense impact of medicine on the environment.

  • Gastrointestinal endoscopy involves the use of large volumes of sterile water to irrigate a non-sterile space in the body.

What this study adds

  • Allows us to understand the views of physicians on the potential use of tap water in GI endoscopy, as well as understand perceived feasibility and barriers.

How this study might affect research, practice, or policy

  • With an understanding of physician support and perceived barriers, specific actions to address these can be taken by regulators.

  • By increasing awareness around the topic, experts can deliberate on the idea and choose to advocate for change, providing leadership in an intimidating discipline.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Social Research Ethics Committee of University College Cork gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Elaborate on themes of Advocacy and Leadership.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 04, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physician and Endoscopy Nurse Perspectives on Tap Water for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Survey on Support, Perceived Barriers, and Intent to Advocate
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Physician and Endoscopy Nurse Perspectives on Tap Water for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Survey on Support, Perceived Barriers, and Intent to Advocate
Anthony James Goodings, Allison Dana Chhor, Hannah Anderson, Mila Pastrak, Sten Kajitani, Matthew Schultzel, Aoife O’Sullivan, Ann-Marie Eustaceryan
medRxiv 2024.11.23.24317703; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.23.24317703
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Physician and Endoscopy Nurse Perspectives on Tap Water for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Survey on Support, Perceived Barriers, and Intent to Advocate
Anthony James Goodings, Allison Dana Chhor, Hannah Anderson, Mila Pastrak, Sten Kajitani, Matthew Schultzel, Aoife O’Sullivan, Ann-Marie Eustaceryan
medRxiv 2024.11.23.24317703; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.23.24317703

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Gastroenterology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (431)
  • Allergy and Immunology (757)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3298)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (365)
  • Dermatology (280)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1173)
  • Epidemiology (13385)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5158)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3276)
  • Health Policy (1143)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1193)
  • Hematology (432)
  • HIV/AIDS (1019)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14638)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (478)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (525)
  • Neurology (4930)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (886)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (728)
  • Orthopedics (282)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (544)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (551)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4218)
  • Public and Global Health (7512)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1708)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1016)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (498)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (549)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)