The Role of Birth Companionship in Women’s Experiences of Mistreatment during Childbirth and Postpartum Depression

Introduction

One-third of women perceive their childbirth experience as traumatic[1], a significant event that can profoundly change a woman’s life and leave enduring memories. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), about 1 in 5 women suffer from common perinatal mental disorders[2]. These psychological distresses during labour make women uniquely vulnerable to environmental influences such as unfamiliar personnel, medicalized procedures, and other conditions, leading them to prefer the presence of someone familiar and comfortable during labour and childbirth[3]. Yet, health systems in LMICs primarily focus on physical health, often deprioritizing or neglecting social and emotional needs. Unfortunately, women are often faced with disrespectful and abusive behaviours during childbirth in facility-based settings[4]. These woeful experiences are likely to have both short- and long-term adverse effects, such as dissatisfaction with maternity care, feelings of re-traumatization, postpartum depression (PPD), and challenges in maternal-infant bonding[3,5].

The World Health Organization (WHO) has strongly recommended the presence of companions of choice during labour and childbirth in their recent guidelines on maternal and newborn care[6–8]; birth companion is also considered as an integral component of respectful maternity care[9]. A review of qualitative studies highlighted the birth companion could play a diverse tangible supportive roles, that include emotional support (e.g., reassurance and praise), informational support (e.g., updates on labour progress and coping techniques), instrumental support (e.g., massage, encouraging mobility), and advocacy (e.g., helping the woman articulate her wishes to others)[10]. A 2017 Cochrane systematic review showed that supportive care during childbirth either from personal companion or professional team improves a range of maternal and infant outcomes. These include a shorter duration of labour, higher perceived control over birth, lower perceived labour pain, a greater likelihood of spontaneous vaginal birth, and increased maternal satisfaction with childbirth services[3]. Despite promising evidence and recommendations from the WHO, the coverage of companionship during labour and childbirth varies considerably across countries, ranging from 4% to 94%[11].

While several studies have sought to enhance understanding of birth companionship, including general perceptions, associated factors, and its impact on maternal outcomes, limited evidence is available on how companionship affects women’s experiences of mistreatment during childbirth and their mental health. Few studies[12–14] came out recently and all of them consistently showed that presence of birth companion reduces the likely of mistreatment. However, none of them examined the characteristics of birth companionship and its relationship with mistreatment[12–14]. Furthermore, there is research examining the relationship between birth companions and maternal mental health. Most of the existing research has focused on the presence of a personal birth companion rather than the impact of the characteristics of that companionship on mental health[15–18]. This study seeks to address existing gaps by: (a) assessing the characteristics of birth companionship during intrapartum care; (b) examining the associations between birth companionship, women’s experiences of mistreatment, and postpartum anxiety and depression; and (c) exploring whether the relationship between birth companionship and postpartum depression is mediated by women’s experiences of mistreatment.

Methods

We report on the endline survey data collected between 13^th September and 11^th December 2021, as part of a larger experimental study conducted in two rural districts of southern Sindh, Pakistan[19]. The main study aimed to promote supportive and respectful maternity care (S-RMC) in six secondary-level public health care facilities. The health facilities provided at least standard basic emergency obstetric and newborn care services. Deliveries ranged from 40 to 300 per month at each facility. The study protocol and the results of primary analysis has been published[19,20]. Briefly, S-RMC intervention targeted skill enhancement of maternity teams and systemic improvements for better governance and accountability in health facilities. It involved comprehensive team training in respectful and psychosocial care, followed by the implementation of practices like vulnerability screening and provision of respectful care and psychosocial support during maternity care. Engagement of birth companion from women’s personal network like mother, sister etc. was an integral component of psychosocial support[21]. The intervention also introduced a feedback system through complaints and exit interviews, and administrative measures like S-RMC data review for performance improvement, staff recognition, and professional development. A mental health first-aider supervised these activities, supported by the research team to ensure effective integration of S-RMC practices[19].

Results

Table 1 describes the socio-demographic and reproductive characteristics of the study participants. The mean age of the women was 29.7 (±5.2) and about one-fourth had at least one functional disability. The majority were Sindhi (93.0%) spoken, had no formal education (81.2%), and about half of them were living on less than $1.25 a day. Regarding reproductive characteristics, 84.4% were primigravida, 93.0% received antenatal care, and 86.0% had vaginal births.

Table 2 details the presence and role of personal companions during labour and childbirth. An overwhelming majority (98.7%) had a companion at some point during their hospital stay. Companions were most commonly present after childbirth (98.4%), during labour (93.6%), and during childbirth itself (85.7%). Most women (83.1%) were allowed a companion full-time in the labour room. In the labour room, the majority of women were accompanied by their in-laws (44.6%), followed by family members (26.1%), and friends (15.0%).

Figure 1 illustrates that the most common types of support provided by birth companions were: informational (79.6.0%), followed by instrumental (63.4%), and emotional (12.4%). Furthermore, the most commonly provided supports were consoling touch and reassuring words (96.8%), supporting nutritional and medicinal needs (96.8%), and maintained privacy (96.2%). On the contrary, avoid doing or saying anything to the women that may hurt was the lowest with 13.4%. The majority of women received multiple forms of support, with a substantial proportion receiving eight out of nine possible types of support assessed (results not shown).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1: Characteristics of birth companionship

Table 3 presents the relationship between the level of companion support and women’s experiences of mistreatment during childbirth, as well as postpartum anxiety and depression. Lack of companion support led to a significant increase in women’s experiences of overall mistreatment, lack of professional standards, ineffective communication, non-confidential care, non-inclusive care, and lack of supportive care. Compared with women who received high companion support, the cumulative level of mistreatment was significantly higher among women who received moderate (adjusted β = 3.68, 95% CI [1.25, 6.11]; p < 0.05) and high (adjusted β = 8.19, 95% CI [2.53, 13.85]; p < 0.05) support. Similarly, the level of non-confidential care was significantly higher among women who received moderate companion support (adjusted β = 7.86, 95% CI [3.97, 11.75]; p < 0.01) and even more so among those who received low support (adjusted β = 19.81, 95% CI [11.53, 28.08]; p < 0.01), compared to women with high support. Furthermore, the mean score of ineffective communication was 15.49 units higher (95% CI −0.02, 30.99; p=0.05) among women received low companion support as compared with women receiving high support. The mean score for lack of supportive care substantially increased among women who received moderate companion support (adjusted β = 16.61, 95% CI [11.93, 21.29]; p < 0.01), and this increase was even greater among those with low companion support (adjusted β = 27.32, 95% CI [14.16, 40.49]; p < 0.001), in comparison to women who received high companion support. Women who received low support from their birth companions were 2.86 times (95% CI 1.52 – 5.39) more likely to experience postpartum anxiety and depression compared to those who received high support. The experiences of lack of professional standards was high among women who received low support from their companion as compared with their counterparts. Counterintuitively, we found that a lack of companion support was associated with fewer experiences of non-inclusive care. Women who received low companion support reported lower scores (adjusted β = −10.77, 95% CI [−13.05, −8.49]; p < 0.001) for non-inclusive care compared to those who received high companion support.

The relationship between the three types of companion support and mistreatment, as well as postpartum anxiety and depression, is detailed in Table 4. Women who received less than three forms of instrumental support reported significantly higher experiences of lack of supportive care (adjusted β = 11.61, 95% CI [3.74, 19.49]; p < 0.05). Similarly, lack of emotional support increased the experiences of lack of supportive care (adjusted β = 11.61, 95% CI [3.74, 19.49]; p < 0.05) and ineffective communication (adjusted β = 8.46, 95% CI [4.81, 12.12]; p < 0.01).

Lack of informational support was associated with overall mistreatment (adjusted β = 8.12, 95% CI [3.74, 12.5]; p < 0.01), including specific types of mistreatment: lack of professional standards (adjusted β = 6.11, 95% CI [0.02, 12.19]; p < 0.05), ineffective communication (adjusted β = 15.77, 95% CI [0.06, 31.48]; p < 0.05), non-confidential care (adjusted β = 15.9, 95% CI [10.02, 21.78]; p < 0.01), and lack of supportive care (adjusted β = 25.49, 95% CI [18.0, 32.97]; p < 0.001). Notably, the odds of postpartum anxiety and depression were 2.21 times higher (95% CI [1.03, 4.35]) among women who did not receive all three forms of informational support from their companion compared to those who did.

Results from the mediation analysis indicate that the effect of companion support on postpartum anxiety and depression is mediated by experiences of mistreatment during childbirth, with every unit reduction in companion support the average cumulative level of overall mistreatment increased by 1.367 units (95% CI 0.11-2.62; p = 0.038). Furthermore, a unit increase in the cumulative level of overall mistreatment is associated with a 4% increase in the likelihood of postpartum anxiety and depression (OR = 1.041, 95% CI 1.01, 1.08; p = 0.034). However, the direct effect of companion support on postpartum depression anxiety and depression was only marginally significant (OR=1.51, p=0.061) (figure 2A). Regarding the type of companion support, emotional support’s effect on postpartum anxiety and depression was mediated through experiences of mistreatment, while the direct relationship was not significant (OR = 1.083, p = 0.810) (Figure 2B). In contrast, instrumental support had a direct, significant association with postpartum anxiety and depression, but its indirect effects were not significant (Figure 2C). Notably, informational support had a significant impact on postpartum anxiety and depression through both direct and indirect pathways (Figure 2D).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2A-D: Links between companionship, mistreatment, and postpartum anxiety and depression

Discussion

Despite the recommendation from the WHO of allowing women to choose a personal birth companion, the policy is not widely implemented across many LMICs[8]. While research shows that having a personal birth companion can reduce mistreatment during childbirth, there is limited evidence on how the characteristics of the companionship affect mistreatment and maternal mental health. We examined the characteristics of support provided by birth companions and their association with women’s experiences of mistreatment and postpartum anxiety and depression.

Our study found that the vast majority of women were accompanied by a personal companion during labour, childbirth, and post-delivery, typically in-laws and family members who provided substantial informational, emotional, and practical support. Higher levels of companion support were significantly associated with reduced mistreatment, particularly in communication, respect for confidentiality, and supportive care. Women who received moderate to high levels of support experienced less mistreatment and overall better care compared to those who received low support. Additionally, greater companion support was linked to reduced postpartum anxiety and depression, primarily due to a decrease in mistreatment experiences.

The presence of birth companions in our study is higher compared to other South Asian countries[24], including Bangladesh (55.5%)[25] and India (73%)[26]. However, it aligns with findings from a previous study conducted in Pakistan[27]. A likely reason for this higher presence is that our analysis is based on a post-intervention survey where birth companionship was a core component of the intervention[19,21,28]. Moreover, companion engagement was perceived as an effective task-sharing strategy that allowed maternity service providers to offer continuous support, thereby reducing their workload[28–30]. In our study, the most common companions were in-laws and other family members, excluding husbands. Although husbands were present at the hospital, they were not permitted in maternity wards, including labour rooms, due to restrictive policies[31], socio-cultural norms[32,33], and privacy concerns for other birthing women, as public hospitals often manage multiple women in large labour rooms[33].

Consistent with other studies[12,14,34,35], we observed a strong relationship between birth companionship and reduced mistreatment. Specifically, experiences of non-confidential care, ineffective communication, and lack of supportive care were significantly reduced. Of the three different types of companion support, informational support emerged as a stronger determinant of the experiences of mistreatment and postpartum anxiety and depression. Qualitative studies also reveal that companions play a crucial role in providing physical, informational, and emotional support to birthing women[10]. For instance, companions help bridge communication gaps by explaining technical jargon used by healthcare providers and providing timely information about labour progress. They also assist in maintaining privacy during physical examinations[14,32] and are well-positioned to offer psychosocial support, understanding the emotional needs of birthing women[28,36]. In terms of informational support, two psychological factors—women’s internal locus of control and increased trust in their companion—may explain the link between informational support, mistreatment, and postpartum depression. Labour and childbirth can be distressing and create uncertainty. Informational support, which provides facts, knowledge, or advice, can alleviate this[37]. When companions offer updates on the mother’s health, it may boost her confidence and internal locus of control[38,39], fostering a sense of control and encouraging active participation in the birthing process. Additionally, informational support may strengthen women’s trust in their companions, reassuring them that they have someone connected with the healthcare staff[32]. This support could help prevent the risk of mistreatment and hence postnatal anxiety and depression.

Our study found a statistically significant relationship between birth companionship and reduced postpartum anxiety and depression, mediated by experiences of mistreatment. Notably, the path analysis further signifies the importance of informational support from companions which has a both direct and indirectly effect postpartum anxiety and depression. These findings emphasize the critical role of birth companions not only in addressing mistreatment but also in enhancing maternal mental health. The association between birth companionship and mistreatment aligns with findings from other studies[40–42]. While limited evidence exists on the exact pathways through which companionship improves mental health, a plausible explanation is that support during facility-based childbirth acts as a buffer against psychological stressors[43], reducing stress hormones and improving labour physiology and emotional well-being[44–46]. This support positively influences the fetopelvic relationship, facilitating the birthing process[47], decreasing mistreatment, reducing medical interventions, and lowering the risk of complications. Consequently, companion support leads to better birthing outcomes, greater maternal satisfaction, and improved postpartum mental health. Findings from our pathway analysis further substantiate the proposed mechanism linking companionship with maternal mental health.

Our study has several strengths and limitations. Among the strengths, we adapted validated tools to measure mistreatment and used a locally validated tool to assess postpartum anxiety and depression. In addition, the inclusion of pathway analysis adds unique value by explaining the mechanisms linking companionship with maternal mental health. The measure of companionship was comprehensive, based on nine items capturing various types of support identified in a recently published systematic review. The study’s limitations include its cross-sectional design, which restricts us from drawing causal inferences about the relationship between birth companionship and maternal mental health. Conducted in secondary-level hospitals in southern Sindh, the findings may have limited generalizability to other settings. Although we developed a comprehensive measure of birth companionship, it has not been validated. The analysis is based on data from the endline survey of a larger experimental study in which birth companionship was a key component of the intervention. Therefore, estimates of the increased presence and support of companions should be interpreted cautiously when compared to observational studies.

Conclusion

Our study findings indicate a strong positive relationship between birth companionship and women’s experiences of mistreatment, particularly regarding non-confidential care, lack of supportive care, and ineffective communication. We also found that the impact of companionship support on postpartum depression is mediated by mistreatment. Of the three types of companion support, informational support emerged as a stronger determinant that has a protective effect on both experiences of mistreatment and postpartum anxiety and depression. These findings highlight the critical role of personal companions during facility-based childbirth in reducing mistreatment and improving maternal mental health. There is a need for supportive policies and health system interventions that actively encourage the engagement of companions from a woman’s personal network during labour and childbirth.