Abstract
The shortage of COVID-19 vaccines posed a significant challenge in optimal response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Fractional doses of vaccine with adequate immunogenic response and proven safety profile emerged as potential strategy to extend the limited vaccine doses. This study was aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of fractional doses of the ChadOx1, Ad26.COV2.S, and BNT162B2 vaccines among healthy Nigerian adults. A non-inferiority multi-site triple-blind clinical trial was undertaken in Nigeria. Healthy Nigerian adults (18-65 years) who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Participants were block-randomized into three vaccine arms (ChadOx1 quarter, half, and full dose; Ad26.COV2.S: quarter, half and full dose; and BNT162B2: half and full dose) . Participants, clinical staff (clinicians and nurses) and laboratory personnel were blinded. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate non-inferiority in seroconversion rates, defined as geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) ≥ 2.5 in serum anti-spike IgG titre at 28 days post-vaccination by ELISA. Immunogenicity analysis included use of serum neutralization assays using pseudotyped virus bearing spike from Wu-1 and Omicron variants. A total of 1891 participants were enrolled between June 21, 2022, and January 25, 2023. 320 participants in the fractional dose group and 220 in the standard dose group completed follow-up and were included in the analysis. SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity at baseline was high, at 68% (365/539). Seroconversion (geometric mean fold rise) was comparable between standard and fractional doses. For ChAdOx1, 31% achieved ≥ 2.5 fold change increase in serum binding antibody in the standard dose arm (16/52), 28% in half dose (15/53), and 34% in quarter dose (18/53). For Ad26.COV2.S, the proportions were 27% (28/105) in standard dose, 32% (22/68) in half dose, and 30% (21/71) in quarter dose arms respectively. For BNT162N2, the proportions were 43% (27/63) in standard dose and 39% (29/75) in half dose. Subset analysis of binding and neutralization responses in (n=64) participants demonstrated high degree of of prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2 ancestral and Omicron lineage variants prior to vaccination. Serum neutralization responses showed ≥2-fold response to both full and fractional doses indicating immunogenic responses to the vaccine dosing regimens. There was no report of serious adverse events. Fractional vaccine doses showed potential to generate non-inferior immune responses compared to standard doses in the context of a population with high rate of previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The three vaccines are safe and well tolerated. Fractional dose should be considered to boost herd immunity and prevent outbreaks of SARS-COV-2.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
PACTR 202206754734018.
Funding Statement
The study's funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was approved by the National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria (NHREC/01/01/2007-28/11/2021) and approval for the conduct of the clinical trial in the country was granted by the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC/DER/VCTD/SIFCoVAN/2022). In addition, all the trial sites obtained ethical approval from their respective local ethics committee [Institutional Review Board (IRB), Nigerian Institute of Medical Research (IRB-22-016), Ministry of Health, Kano State (NHREC/17/03/2018), Health Research Ethics Committee, Delta State University Teaching Hospital (HREC/PAN/2022/021/0469), NIPRD Health Research Ethics Committee (NHREC/039/21A), and NAUTH Health Research Ethics Committee (NAUTH/CS/66/VOL.15/VER.3/053/2022/036)]. According to the Declaration of Helsinki, the trial complied with good clinical practice guidelines. The protocol was registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR) with approval number PACTR 202206754734018.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
