Abstract
Background Between 2017 and 2018, nine overdose prevention sites and supervised consumption sites (OPS/SCS) began operating in Toronto, Canada. This paper aimed to evaluate the effects of the OPS/SCS on incidence and rates of crime (i.e., assault, auto theft, break and enter, robbery, theft over $5000, bicycle theft, and theft from motor vehicle) and mental health act apprehensions.
Methods Primary analyses used multiple baseline interrupted time series to compare outcome incidences within 100m, 200m and 500m of each OPS/SCS pre- vs. post-implementation. Secondary analyses compared rates of outcomes in treated vs. synthetic control neighbourhoods. We used exclusively publicly available confirmed incidents that occurred within city boundaries between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2024.
Results Within 100m of OPS/SCS, incidents of assaults (61%, 95%CI: 10 to 134%), robberies (62%, 95%CI: 10 – 138%), and break and enters (47%, 95%CI: 6 – 104%) increased following sites’ implementation; but monthly incident trends for robberies (-2%, 95%CI: -3 – 0%) and break and enters (- 2%, 95%CI: -3 – -1%) declined. At 200m and 500m, there were no observed level effects in incidents of assault or robberies, but level effects persisted for break and enters. Further, thefts from motor vehicles (- 2%, 95%CI: -3% – -1%) declined faster post-implementation. Our secondary analysis revealed rates of assaults increased faster (1%, 95%CI: 0 – 1%; p=0.003) in treated neighbourhoods compared with synthetic controls.
Conclusions and relevance The effects of Toronto’s OPS/SCS on crime were complex; with immediate effects being attenuated or reversed over time.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study received support from Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Insight Development Grant (no. 430-2022-00061), and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Grant (no. 436351). DP holds a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in the Economics of Harm Reduction.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We used data from four publicly available datasets collected and maintained by Toronto Police Service: Major Crime Indicators (MCI), Bicycle Thefts, Theft from Motor Vehicle, and Mental Health Act Apprehensions. The data can be found at https://data.torontopolice.on.ca/search?layout=grid For the neighbourhood level analyses, we linked Toronto Police Service records with 2011, 2016, and 2021 census tract profiles using their respective year of incidence and boundary files for point-in-polygon spatial joins. This data can be found at https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-168-X
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at
