Abstract
Background The Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) Pathway, a joint health and criminal justice initiative across England and Wales, aims to support rehabilitation of individuals with a likely diagnosis of personality disorder. Pathways Enhanced Resettlement Services (PERS) is an OPD service currently operating in five open prisons in England, which aims to support people at high risk of being returned to closed conditions or reoffending in the community after release. We aimed to understand service user and staff experiences of PERS.
Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with ten staff and nine service users. We then conducted a reflexive thematic analysis generating three themes.
Results The three themes identified were: (1) “A shock to the system”, describing the challenges for service users posed by the liminal space of open prison (between higher security conditions and the community); and how in this context PERS might be viewed with suspicion but was for interviewees ultimately a space where they felt valued. (2) “We’ve got some understanding of their journey”; staff and service users described PERS staff developing more trusting relationships with service users than non-PERS staff, where service users felt understood and supported, practically and emotionally; and (3) “internal states can be real barriers to progression”; PERS staff supported service users to understand and overcome barriers, through enabling self-reflection, and tailoring support to times of greater stress, including key milestones such as parole boards or periods of trial leave.
Conclusions Staff and service users feel PERS provides support to progress through open prison, through development of positive trusting relationships and individualised support in a challenging context where such support was not otherwise available.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by LISS-DTP, an ESRC funded doctoral programme.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of Queen Mary University of London (Joint Research Management Office) gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Due to the sensitive nature of the work and for confidentiality purposes, the ethics committee did not permit making data produced in the study available.
List of Abbreviations
- OPD
- Offender Personality Disorder
- PERS
- Pathways Enhanced Resettlement Service
- ROTL
- Release on Temporary Licence
