ABSTRACT
Importance Rates of sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) remain high in several high-income countries. Several studies reported rates of pictures of sleeping infants or infant sleeping environments that were highly inconsistent with safe infant sleep recommendations (SISRs) to prevent SUDI.
Objective To provide robust and synthetized evidence to decision-makers involved in corrective actions, we systematically assessed the proportion of pictures that were inconsistent with SISRs in the visual exposome of infant caretakers.
Data Sources In November 2023, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.
Study Selection Eligible studies included were those reporting the quantitative evaluation of the inconsistency between one or several SISRs and pictures depicting sleeping infants or a sleeping environment intended for an infant in physical and digital public spaces.
Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were extracted independently by 2 authors. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed with a customized version of Hoy’s tool for prevalence studies. A random-effects logistic regression model was used to obtain summary estimates of proportions of pictures. Between-study heterogeneity was estimated with the I2 statistic.
Main Outcomes(s) and Measure(s) The proportion of pictures inconsistent with one or several SISRs from the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Results We screened 1,086 articles and included 7 studies conducted between 2008 and 2023 that analyzed pictures found in parenting magazines, online and print newspapers, baby diaper packaging, commercial stock photography websites, and Instagram. The overall risk of bias was deemed low. Among the 5,442 pictures depicting sleeping infants or infant sleep environments, the summary estimates of the proportion of inconsistencies with SISRs were 39% for a non-supine sleeping position, 5% for a soft sleeping surface, 8% for sharing the sleeping surface, 14% for an unsafe crib, 58% for soft objects or loose bedding, 17% for a covered head, and 85% for at least one SISR inconsistency. All summary estimates had significant between-study heterogeneity.
Conclusions and Relevance Infant caretakers’ visual exposome is greatly inconsistent with SISRs and could lead to dangerous practices, which should prompt actions from manufacturers, advertisers, newspaper and website editors, social media moderators, and legislators.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
