Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Predicting cognitive function three months after surgery in patients with a glioma

View ORCID ProfileSander Martijn Boelders, Bruno Nicenboim, Elke Butterbrod, Wouter de Baene, Eric Postma, Geert-Jan Rutten, Lee-Ling Ong, Karin Gehring
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.08.24315076
Sander Martijn Boelders
1Department of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
2Department of Cognitive Sciences and AI, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sander Martijn Boelders
Bruno Nicenboim
2Department of Cognitive Sciences and AI, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elke Butterbrod
1Department of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wouter de Baene
3Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Postma
2Department of Cognitive Sciences and AI, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geert-Jan Rutten
1Department of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lee-Ling Ong
2Department of Cognitive Sciences and AI, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karin Gehring
1Department of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
3Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: k.gehring{at}tilburguniversity.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Patients with a glioma often suffer from cognitive impairments both before and after anti-tumor treatment. Ideally, clinicians can rely on predictions of post-operative cognitive functioning for individual patients based on information obtainable before surgery. Such predictions would facilitate selecting the optimal treatment considering patients’ onco-functional balance.

Method Cognitive functioning three months after surgery was predicted for 317 patients with a glioma across eight cognitive tests. Nine multivariate Bayesian regression models were used following a machine-learning approach while employing pre-operative neuropsychological test scores and a comprehensive set of clinical predictors obtainable before surgery. Model performances were compared using the Expected Log Pointwise Predictive Density (ELPD), and pointwise predictions were assessed using the Coefficient of Determination (R²) and Mean Absolute Error. Models were compared against models employing only pre-operative cognitive functioning and the best-performing model was interpreted. Moreover, an example prediction including uncertainty for clinical use was provided.

Results The best-performing model obtained a median R² of 34.20%. Individual predictions, however, were uncertain. Pre-operative cognitive functioning was the most influential predictor. Models including clinical predictors performed similarly to those using only pre-operative functioning (ΔELPD 14.4±10.0, ΔR² −0.53%.).

Conclusion Post-operative cognitive functioning cannot yet reliably be predicted from pre-operative cognitive functioning and the included clinical predictors. Moreover, predictions relied strongly on pre-operative cognitive functioning. Consequently, clinicians should not rely on the included predictors to infer patients’ cognitive functioning after treatment. Moreover, it stresses the need to collect larger cross-center multimodal datasets to obtain more certain predictions for individual patients.

Importance of the study Patients with a glioma often suffer from cognitive impairments both before and after anti-tumor treatment. Ideally, clinicians would be able to rely on predictions of cognitive functioning after treatment for individual patients based on information that is obtainable before surgery. Such predictions would facilitate selecting the optimal treatment considering patients’ onco-functional balance and could improve patient counseling. First, our study shows that cognitive functioning three months after surgery cannot be reliably predicted from pre-operative cognitive functioning and the included clinical predictors, with pre-operative cognitive functioning being the most important predictor. Consequently, clinicians should not rely on the included predictors to infer individual patients’ cognitive functioning after surgery. Second, results demonstrate how individual predictions resulting from Bayesian models, including their uncertainty estimates, may ultimately be used in clinical practice. Third, our results show the importance of collecting additional predictors and stress the need to collect larger cross-center multimodal datasets.

Key points

  • - Cognitive functioning after treatment cannot yet reliably be predicted

  • - Pre-operative cognitive functioning was the most important predictor

  • - Additional predictors and larger cross-center datasets are needed

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by ZonMw (10070012010006, 824003007).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was part of a protocol registered with the Medical Ethics Committee Brabant (file number NW2020-32).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data availability

Data described in this work is not publicly available to protect the privacy of patients. All code used in this study is available as supplementary material.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 08, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predicting cognitive function three months after surgery in patients with a glioma
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Predicting cognitive function three months after surgery in patients with a glioma
Sander Martijn Boelders, Bruno Nicenboim, Elke Butterbrod, Wouter de Baene, Eric Postma, Geert-Jan Rutten, Lee-Ling Ong, Karin Gehring
medRxiv 2024.10.08.24315076; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.08.24315076
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Predicting cognitive function three months after surgery in patients with a glioma
Sander Martijn Boelders, Bruno Nicenboim, Elke Butterbrod, Wouter de Baene, Eric Postma, Geert-Jan Rutten, Lee-Ling Ong, Karin Gehring
medRxiv 2024.10.08.24315076; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.08.24315076

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Oncology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (755)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3288)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (277)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1169)
  • Epidemiology (13359)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (898)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5147)
  • Geriatric Medicine (481)
  • Health Economics (782)
  • Health Informatics (3264)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1190)
  • Hematology (429)
  • HIV/AIDS (1017)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14622)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (912)
  • Medical Education (476)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (522)
  • Neurology (4919)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (727)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (882)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2519)
  • Ophthalmology (723)
  • Orthopedics (280)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1299)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
  • Primary Care Research (556)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4205)
  • Public and Global Health (7499)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1704)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1011)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (479)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (547)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (235)
  • Urology (205)