Acute psilocybin and ketanserin effects on cerebral blood flow: 5-HT2AR neuromodulation in healthy humans

Kristian Larsen, Ulrich Lindberg, Brice Ozenne, Drummond E. McCulloch, Sophia Armand, Martin K. Madsen, Annette Johansen, Dea S. Stenbæk, Gitte M. Knudsen, Patrick M. Fisher
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.19.24313958

Abstract

Psilocin, the active metabolite of psilocybin, is a psychedelic and agonist at the serotonin 2A receptor (5-HT2AR) that has shown positive therapeutic effects for brain disorders such as depression. To elucidate the brain effects of psilocybin, we directly compared the acute effects of 5-HT2AR agonist (psilocybin) and antagonist (ketanserin) on cerebral blood flow (CBF) using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a single-blind, cross-over study in 28 healthy participants. We evaluated associations between plasma psilocin level (PPL) or subjective drug intensity (SDI) and CBF. We also evaluated drug effects on internal carotid artery (ICA) diameter using time-of-flight MRI angiography. PPL and SDI were significantly negatively associated with regional and global CBF (∼11.5% at peak drug effect, p<0.0001). CBF did not significantly change following ketanserin (2.3%, p=0.35). Psilocybin induced a significantly greater decrease in CBF compared to ketanserin in the parietal cortex (pFWER<0.0001). ICA diameter was significantly decreased following psilocybin (10.5%, p<0.0001) but not ketanserin (−0.02%, p=0.99). Our data support an asymmetric 5-HT2AR modulatory effect on CBF and provide the first in vivo human evidence that psilocybin constricts the ICA, which has important implications for understanding the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying its acute effects.

Introduction

Psilocybin has emerged as a promising therapeutic showing rapid and lasting reductions in clinical symptoms across several brain disorders, including major depression,1–3 cancer related anxiety and depressive symptoms,4,5 and cigarette and alcohol addiction. 6 A psychedelic dose of psilocybin induces subjective effects lasting 6-8 hours characterised by visual alterations, profound mood changes and shifts in the perception of space, time and selfhood.7,8 Psilocybin has also been shown to produce lasting changes in self-reported measures including increased personality trait openness, decreased neuroticism, increased mindfulness and life-satisfaction including in healthy individuals.9–16 After intake, psilocybin is dephosphorylated to its active metabolite, psilocin (4-OH-N,N-dimethyltryptamine),17 which is a partial agonist at several serotonergic receptors, including the serotonin 2A receptor (5-HT2AR). 18 Accumulating evidence shows 5-HT2AR stimulation underlies the acute psychedelic effects 19–24, e.g., pre-treatment with ketanserin blocks the acute psychedelic effect of psilocybin,20 and other classical psychedelics,21 and ketanserin administration reverses acute psychedelic effects following lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD).25 Neuronal 5-HT2ARs are predominantly expressed on the apical dendrites of excitatory pyramidal neurons in the cortical layers III and V, GABAergic neurons, and monoaminergic terminals.26–28 Notably, 5-HT2ARs are also expressed on smooth muscle cells in blood vessels, where they can induce vasoconstriction and consequently increased blood pressure.29–31 In vitro studies confirm that 5-HT2AR-induced arterial contractions are abolished by antagonists like ketanserin, which acts as a vasodilator in the presence of serotonin.32–36 Understanding the in vivo neurovascular effects of 5-HT2AR modulation could enhance our knowledge of how psychedelics affect brain function.

Recent blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) studies of human brain function show substantial acute effects of psychedelics on functional brain connectivity. Most consistently, resting-state BOLD fMRI scans during the acute experience increases global connectivity, particularly between transmodal resting-state networks. 37,38 Estimating CBF with arterial spin labelling (ASL) can provide complementary information related to neural signalling that can be estimated in absolute units (ml/100g/min) and may inform neural correlates of psychedelic drug effects.39 Acute psilocybin effects on CBF have been previously reported in three studies using ASL fMRI.40–42 Carhart-Harris and colleagues40 reported decreased CBF up to 12 minutes following intravenous administration of 1-2 mg of psilocybin in 15 healthy participants. Lewis and colleagues41 reported decreased CBF approximately 60 minutes following oral psilocybin administration of 0.16 or 0.215 mg/kg in 58 healthy participants, an effect echoed in a follow-up analysis including 12 additional participants42. Lewis and colleagues also considered an alternative CBF quantification strategy using regional relative hyperperfusion, which they argued aligns with results following psychedelic administration using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) studies of CBF and glucose metabolism, respectively.43,44 Contrasting acute psilocybin effects with a 5-HT2AR antagonist would contribute to our understanding of how 5-HT2AR modulation shapes neurovascular function.

In this randomised, single-blind, cross-over study in healthy participants, we contrasted the acute effects of a single oral dose of psilocybin or ketanserin on CBF with pseudo-continuous ASL (pcASL). We mapped changes in CBF at several time points after psilocybin administration. To more comprehensively characterise cerebrovascular effects, we examined acute drug effects on internal carotid artery (ICA) diameter. We evaluated the association between CBF and plasma psilocin levels (PPL) and subjective drug intensity (SDI), which are related to brain 5-HT2AR receptor occupancy and functional connectivity.45,46

Methods and materials

Participants

Twenty-eight healthy volunteers participated in this study (10 females, age (mean ± SD): 33 ± 8 years). Participants were recruited from a database of individuals interested in participating in a brain imaging study involving the administration of psychedelics. BOLD fMRI data unrelated to the current study and from a subset of participants described herein has been reported in previous studies.7,16,46–48 Here, we present the pcASL data for the first time. Recruitment began in September 2018 and ended in March 2021. Forty-four individuals were assessed for eligibility, of which 16 were excluded (see Figure 1). Exclusion criteria were 1) present or previous personal or family (first degree relatives) history of psychiatric disease (DSM axis 1 or WHO ICD-10 diagnostic classification) including substance misuse disorder; 2) present or previous neurological condition/disease, significant medical disorders or intake of drugs suspected to influence test results; 3) non-fluent in Danish; 4) vision or hearing impairment; 5) learning disability; 6) pregnancy; 7) breastfeeding; 8) MRI contraindications; 9) alcohol or drug abuse; 10) allergy to test drugs; 11) significant exposure to radiation within the past year (e.g., medical imaging investigations); 12) intake of QT-prolonging medication or electrocardiogram (ECG) results indicative of heart disease; 13) history of significant adverse response to a hallucinogenic drug; 14) use of hallucinogenic drugs less than 6 months prior to inclusion; 15) blood donation less than 3 months before project participation; 16) body weight less than 50 kg; 17) low plasma ferritin levels (< 12 μg/L). Standard laboratory blood sample tests were conducted and an electrocardiogram was taken to ensure that individuals were in good overall physiological health (e.g., absent evidence for a prolonged QT interval). Prior to inclusion, participants received written and verbal descriptions of the study protocol, including the expected effects of psilocybin and potential side effects of psilocybin and ketanserin; all participants provided written consent prior to study participation. The data presented here is part of a broader study approved by the ethics committee for the Capital Region of Copenhagen (journal identifier: H-16028698, amendments: 56023, 56967, 57974, 59673, 60437, 62255) and Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT identifier: 2016-004000-61, amendments: 2017014166, 2017082837, 2018023295).

Figure 1:
Figure 1: CONSORT Flow Diagram.

This diagram shows the enrollment and allocation of participants in a study evaluating the effects of psilocybin and ketanserin on cerebral blood flow. 44 participants were assessed for eligibility, with 28 being randomised into the study. 17 participants received psilocybin first and 11 received ketanserin first, with a minimum 3 week washout period in between. All 28 participants completed the psilocybin intervention, whereas 4 participants failed to complete the ketanserin session.

Study design

This study used a single-blind, within-subject, cross-over design with two drug intervention sessions: (i) psilocybin and (ii) ketanserin. Seventeen participants were assigned to receive psilocybin first, 11 assigned to ketanserin first. The allocation was generated by a staff member who was not otherwise involved in the project. Drug sessions were separated by at least three weeks (mean: 31 days, median: days, range: [21-105]; time between sessions was more than 42 days for only one participant due to delay following the Covid-19 lockdown). Additional details about the overall study design have been described previously.46

Study procedures

Participants were asked to refrain from alcohol the night before intervention days, to eat a light breakfast and to refrain from caffeine intake on the day of intervention. Before drug administration and pcASL data acquisition, a urine sample was obtained and screened for amphetamines, opioids, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, tetrahydrocannabinol, cocaine, ketamine, phencyclidine, and gamma-hydroxybutyrate (Rapid Response, BTNX Inc). Participants met with two psychologists before the intervention day for preparation (approx. one week) and again the day after the psilocybin intervention for integration of the experience. On intervention days, between scans, participants retired to a comfortable and pleasant room adjacent to the MR scanner, where music was played. At least one psychologist was present with the participant to provide interpersonal support throughout the psilocybin intervention, including during MR scanning.

Participants completed a pre-drug MRI scan including structural, pcASL, and angiography scans (detailed below). The pre-drug scan was followed by a brief conversation with the psychologists, after which drug was administered. We administered psilocybin according to body weight in units of 3 mg capsules (0.26 ± 0.04 mg/kg, absolute dose 19.8 ± 3.7 mg, mean ± SD) and ketanserin as a single 20 mg tablet. These doses were selected to achieve a comparable peak 5-HT2AR occupancy 1-3 hours after administration of approximately 70% (see Supplementary Figure S1).45,49,50 Drugs were given with a glass of water. On psilocybin days, pcASL scans were acquired at approximately 40, 80, 130, and 300 minutes post-drug to capture both peak drug effects as well as the subsequent decline. Blood samples for PPL and SDI assessments were taken after each scan. Participants were sent home once SDI levels dropped below 1 after the final scan.On ketanserin days, pcASL scans were acquired before and at approximately 80 minutes post-drug. While not in the scanner, participants were listening to music in the adjacent room. On ketanserin days, participants with an SDI < 1 after 130 minutes completed self-report questionnaires and were sent home following a short debriefing.

Plasma psilocin level

PPL was measured in venous blood samples drawn from a catheter in the antecubital vein after each pcASL scan. The blood samples were centrifuged and the plasma fraction frozen and briefly stored at −20°C before being transferred to −80°C until analysis. Plasma psilocin levels were measured using ultra performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry, as previously described,45 reflecting free, unconjugated psilocin and not glucuronidated psilocin.51 Plasma psilocin is reported in units μg psilocin per L plasma (μg/L).

Subjective drug intensity

Following each pcASL scan, an SDI rating was acquired by asking the participant: “How intense is your experience right now on a scale from 0 to 10?” (Likert scale, 0 = not intense at all, 10 = very intense).

Magnetic resonance imaging

Participants were scanned on one of two 3 Tesla Siemens Magnetom Prisma MRI scanners (Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (MR1 and MR2). Each participant completed all their scans on only one MRI scanner. Fifteen participants completed scan sessions on MR1 and thirteen participants on MR2. All images were visually inspected for quality using the FSL image viewer, FSLeyes.52

Magnetic resonance imaging parameters

MR1

Related data from the participants scanned on this scanner has been reported previously.46,47 Imaging data were acquired using a 64-channel head/neck coil. During the pre-drug scan we acquired a high-resolution, T1-weighted 3D MPRAGE structural image (inversion time = 900ms, echo time = 2.58ms, repetition time = 1900ms, flip angle = 9°, in-plane matrix = 256×256, in-plane resolution = 0.9mm×0.9mm, number of slices: 224, slice thickness = 0.9mm, no gap). CBF was estimated using a 2D echo-planar imaging (EPI) gradient spin-echo sequence (scan time = 5.33 min, echo time = 12ms, repetition time = 4000ms, flip angle = 90°, label duration: 1508ms, single post-labeling delay = 1500ms, in-plane matrix = 64×64, in-plane resolution = 3mm×3mm, number of slices = 20, slice thickness = 5mm no gap, number of control/label pairs = 40, slice readout duration = 35ms). To calibrate the pcASL signal, an M0 scan was acquired using the same imaging parameters as the pcASL except for a repetition time of 10000ms. We acquired a gradient echo sequence (GRE) to correct for geometric distortions in the pcASL images (echo time 1 = 4.92ms, echo time 2 = 7.38ms, repetition time = 400ms).

MR2

Imaging data were acquired using a 32-channel head coil. During the pre-drug scan, we acquired a high-resolution, T1-weighted 3D MPRAGE structural image (inversion time = 920ms, echo time = 2.41ms, repetition time = 1810ms, flip angle = 9°, in-plane matrix = 288×288, in-plane resolution = 0.8×0.8mm2, slice thickness = 0.8mm, number of slices = 224, no gap). CBF was estimated using a five post-label delay 3D turbo gradient spin echo sequence (scan time = 7.11min, 12 label/control pairs, native voxel size: 2.5×2.5×3mm3, image matrix = 96×96×40, label duration = 1508ms, post-label delays = [500, 500, 1000, 1000, 1500, 1500, 2000, 2000, 2000, 2500, 2500, 2500]ms, echo time = 3.78ms, repetition time = 4100ms, flip angle: 120°), two background suppression pulses optimised for each PLD.. The acquisition included an M0 scan with which to calibrate the pcASL signal without any background suppression. Spin-echo echo-planar acquisitions with opposite phase-encoded blips were acquired to correct for geometric distortions using topup implemented in FSL (FMRIB software library, www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk).53,54 Notably, for the 13 participants scanned on MR2, we also acquired a time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography sequence using a 3D flow-compensated gradient echo technique with multiple slabs (echo time = 3.42ms, repetition time = 19ms, flip angle = 18°, slice thickness = 1.3mm, spacing between slices = 1.3mm, base resolution = 256×256, phase resolution = 0.8, partial Fourier factor = 0.75).

Participant exclusion and missing data

During psilocybin intervention days, four participants did not complete all planned pcASL scans. On MR1, one participant missed the post-drug scan at +300-min due to technical issues, and another did not complete it due to nausea. On MR2, one participant did not complete any post-drug scans due to discomfort, while another missed the +130-min and +300-min scans due to nausea. For the ketanserin session, four participants were excluded: one due to the Covid-19 lockdown, and three due to drug availability issues. We analysed only the pre-drug and +80-min scans, which corresponds to periods of comparable 5-HT2AR occupancy between psilocybin and ketanserin (see Supplementary Figure S1).45,49

pcASL data quality control

Several scans were excluded due to quality issues. Two post-psilocybin scans from one MR1 participant were excluded due to excessive head motion. Additionally, five post-psilocybin scans (four from MR1 and one from MR2) were excluded for the same reason. On ketanserin days, four scans from two MR2 participants were excluded due to image artefacts, and three additional scans were excluded for falling outside the peak occupancy time window.

CBF quantification

MR1 preprocessing

The pcASL data underwent intramodal registration dividing label and control images (40 pairs) before realigning them. The pcASL data were then unwarped to correct for B0 field distortions. Realignment and distortion correction was then performed using SPM12 (https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12/). The high-resolution T1-weighted structural image was co-registered with the realigned and motion corrected pcASL data. We corrected for the interleaved slice acquisitions in the 2D EPI protocol using a delay in slice time acquisition of 35ms.

MR2 preprocessing

For each of the PLDs, a label/control difference image was realigned and the high-resolution T1-weighted structural image was co-registered with the M0 image. Co-registration with the pcASL images like we did for the MR1 data was not possible without introducing transformation artefacts.

All pcASL images from both scanners were quantified to absolute CBF values using BASIL in FSL (FMRIB software library, www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk),55 which performs subtraction of label/control images and calibrates the signal to absolute CBF (ml/100g/min) incorporating the M0 scan and modelling the tracer kinetics using a single, well-mixed tissue compartment model.56 We used standard settings for the quantitative modelling described previously.56 The structural image was segmented in SPM12 into grey matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid probability maps. The calibrated pcASL image was normalised into (MNI) standard space based on estimated warps from the segmentation step. Normalised pcASL images were spatially smoothed with a 3D Gaussian kernel of 8 mm Full-Width at Half-Maximum (FWHM).

ICA diameter quantification

We developed and applied an in-house, semi-automatic tool (GitHub link: https://github.com/kristian1801/ica-segmentation-tool) for ICA segmentation and diameter quantification. TOF images underwent preprocessing to enhance vascular structures, including background subtraction, anisotropic diffusion filtering, and top-hat filtering. User-guided segmentation was performed via a graphical interface, where the user manually selected the ICA. A 2D region-growing algorithm with dynamic intensity thresholding was then applied to segment the chosen vessel across all axial slices. The software reconstructed a 3D model of the segmented ICA and calculated its diameter by taking the median of measurements from each image slice.

Data analysis

Regions of interest

Regions of interest (ROIs) for CBF-associated analyses were defined using the Anatomical Automatic Labelling (AAL3) atlas.57 The AAL3 delineates 170 ROIs in MNI space but here we grouped adjacent ROIs to form 13 larger, bilateral ROIs for the analysis, based on previous studies of acute psilocybin effects on CBF 40,41: prefrontal cortex, temporal cortex, parietal cortex, occipital cortex, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), thalamus, amygdala, putamen, caudate nucleus, hippocampus, insula, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). See Supplemental Material for a description of AAL3 regions combined to produce each ROI.

We computed and evaluated grey-matter weighted regional CBF as defined by subject-specific grey-matter segmentation maps. We computed global grey-matter weighted CBF across all voxels within cortical and subcortical regions in the AAL3 atlas. The cerebellar ROI was excluded from analyses due to inconsistent field of view coverage across participants.

Associations of CBF and ICA diameter with PPL and SDI

A total of 124 pcASL scans were included from psilocybin intervention days (70 from MR1, 54 from MR2), and 49 pcASL scans were included from ketanserin days (30 from MR1, 19 from MR2). We used linear mixed-effects models (LME) to estimate associations between exposure variables (PPL or SDI) and brain measurements (global or regional CBF, or ICA diameter). We included participant ID as a random effect to account for correlations between repeated observations from the same participant; age, sex, and scanner were included as fixed effects. We fitted separate LMEs for each combination of outcome (global CBF, 13 regional CBF measurements, and ICA diameter) and exposure (PPL or SDI). The regression coefficient β quantifies the association, representing the average change in the brain measurement (Y) for a one-unit increase in the exposure variable (X), while keeping other characteristics constant. We assessed statistical significance using Wald tests. For the 13 regional CBF tests, we adjusted p-values using Dunnett’s method to control the family-wise error rate (pFWER). 58 We did not adjust p-values for global CBF and ICA diameter. We used a statistical significance threshold of p or pFWER < 0.05. We also report the estimated maximum percent change as Embedded Image, where E[Y|X, Z] denotes the expected value of the brain measurement Y, given the exposure X and other covariates Z, X_max is the maximum exposure value (19.3 μg/L for PPL, 10 for SDI) and X_min is the minimum exposure value (0 for both PPL and SDI). As an exploratory analysis, we estimated receptor occupancy using PPL values and the Emax model from our previous work 45 (Supplementary Figure S2): Occupancy = (Occmax* PPL) / (EC50 + PPL), where EC50 is the concentration at half-maximal effect. Occmax was set as 76.6% and EC50 as 1.96 µg/L.

Ketanserin effects and drug-x-time effects on CBF and ICA diameter

For ketanserin effects, each model included time (pre-drug vs. +80-min) as the independent variable, with sex, age, and scanner as covariates. We reported percent change in CBF and ICA following ketanserin administration using the same formula as described following formula: Embedded Image, denotes the expected value of the brain measurement Y, given the exposure X and other covariates Z. X_max represents the peak time point (+80-min post-drug administration), and X_min represents the pre-drug timepoint. Drug-x-time interaction effects models were structured similarly to the ketanserin effects models, with the addition of a drug-x-time interaction term, allowing for comparison of the effect of psilocybin versus ketanserin from pre-drug to +80-min. For a comparison of the occupancy estimates of psilocybin and ketanserin, please refer to supplementary Figure S1. We adjusted p-values using Dunnett’s method to control the family-wise error rate (pFWER). We did not adjust P-values for global CBF and ICA diameter. We evaluated all associations using a statistical significance threshold of p or pFWER < 0.05.

Visualisations, code and data availability

The MATLAB and R code used to generate the results presented in this study can be made available upon request. We used BrainNet Viewer59 (https://www.nitrc.org/projects/bnv/) to generate the brain colour maps presented in Figure 2a. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study can be made available upon completion of a formal data-sharing agreement.

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Time course of cerebral blood flow (CBF), plasma psilocin level (PPL) and subjective drug intensity (SDI) before and after psilocybin intake.

a) Brain representations are colour maps created from the absolute voxel-wise CBF values. b) A boxplot of global, grey-matter weighted CBF at pre-drug, +40-, +80-, +130- and +300-min following psilocybin administration. Asterisks mark the mean value. b) and c) temporal trajectories of PPL and SDI (group mean ± 1 SD) associated with imaging sessions.

Results

On psilocybin days, we observed ranges for PPL [0 - 27.6 μg/L], SDI [0 - 10], and CBF [22.9 - 77.0 ml/100g/min] throughout the time course of the intervention. The time course of PPL and SDI over the experiment was similar, confirming both drug uptake and associated subjective effects (Figure 2b-c). All participants reported psychoactive effects following psilocybin administration, as evidenced by high ratings on the SDI scale. In contrast, ketanserin produced negligible subjective effects, and most participants rated their SDI at or near zero at the +80-min post-drug scan session (SDI score: mean = 0.23, median = 0, range = 0-3).

Global CBF decreases following psilocybin intake

We observed decreased global CBF following psilocybin administration (Figure 2a). There was a significant negative association between global CBF and both PPL (ß=-0.38, 95% CI = [−0.56, −0.20] ml/100g/min per μg/L of psilocin, p < 1e-04) and SDI (ß=-0.75, 95% CI = [−0.1, −0.41] ml/100g/min per unit SDI, p < 1e-04), see also Table 1 and Figure 3. This corresponds to a ∼11.6% decrease in global CBF at peak PPL or SDI.

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Associations between regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) and plasma psilocin level (PPL) and subjective drug intensity (SDI).

a), b), c) and d) display the global, parietal, occipital and temporal region associations with PPL, respectively. Panels e), f), g) and h) display associations with SDI. Associations with CBF are plotted adjusting for age, sex and scanner. Each colour denotes a unique individual.

View this table:
Table 1. Associations with plasma psilocin level and subjective drug intensity.

Associations between CBF and PPL or SDI

All regions, except the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and hippocampus, displayed a numerically negative association between PPL and CBF (Table 1). The effects were statistically significant in the parietal, occipital, All regions displayed a numerically negative association between SDI and CBF (Table 1). Effects were estimated receptor occupancy and CBF (Supplementary Figure S2 and Table S1).

View this table:
Table S1. Association between CBF and 5-HT2ARoccupancy

Intake of ketanserin was not associated with a statistically significant change in global CBF (p = 0.35, Table 2), Intake of ketanserin was not associated with a statistically significant change in ICA diameter (p = 0.99), see Table 2.

View this table:
Table 2. Ketanserin and drug-x-time effects.

Contrasting ketanserin and psilocybin effects on CBF and ICA diameter

Contrasting ketanserin and psilocybin effects on global CBF at 80-minutes post-drug administration relative to baseline, we did not see a statistically significant drug-x-time interaction effect (p = 0.14; Table 2 and Figure 4). However, we did find a statistically significant drug-x-time interaction effect on parietal cortex CBF such that the psilocybin-induced decrease in CBF was significantly larger than the effect of ketanserin (ß=-7.86, 95% CI = significant drug-x-time interaction effects on CBF (Table 2). We also observed a significant drug-x-time Figure 4).

Figure 4:
Figure 4: Effects of Ketanserin and Psilocybin on Cerebral Blood Flow and ICA Diameter.

Global CBF, Parietal CBF, and ICA diameter shown before and +80-min after administration of psilocybin and ketanserin. Red and green circles and lines represent the ketanserin and psilocybin treatments, respectively. Smaller points denote individual observations, population mean values indicated by larger circles and error bars representing one standard error on the mean.

Associations between ICA diameter and PPL or SDI

We found that psilocybin intake was associated with a decrease in ICA diameter (Figure 5), with a significant negative association between ICA diameter and both PPL (ß=-0.02, 95% CI = [−0.03, −0.015] mm per μg/L of psilocin, p < 1e-04) and SDI (ß=-0.03, 95% CI = [−0.038, −0.014] mm per unit SDI, p < 1e-04). This corresponds to a 10.5% decrease in ICA diameter at peak PPL and a 6.6% decrease at peak SDI.

Figure 5.
Figure 5. Associations between internal carotid artery (ICA) diameter and plasma psilocin level (PPL) and subjective drug intensity (SDI).

a) ICA diameter changes over time following psilocybin administration. Box plots show distribution at each time point, with individual measurements as dots. Asterisks indicate means. b) Association between ICA diameter and PPL. Each colour represents a unique individual. c) Association between ICA diameter and SDI. Associations with ICA diameter are adjusted for age, sex.

Discussion

Here, we evaluated and contrasted the acute effects of psilocybin and ketanserin, drugs with agonist and antagonist effects at the 5-HT2AR, respectively, on global and regional CBF in healthy individuals. Psilocybin intake was associated with up to an 11.6% reduction in global CBF; we show here for the first time that this change is significantly associated with both PPL and SDI, which we have previously shown to be tightly related to brain 5-HT2AR occupancy,45 associated with changes in BOLD functional network connectivity46, occurrence of dynamic brain states49, and certain forms of brain-entropy.48 Additionally, we observed a significant decrease in ICA diameter following psilocybin administration, with a 10.5% reduction at peak PPL, highlighting the physiological effect of psilocybin on cerebral vasculature. Neither CBF nor ICA diameter were significantly changed following ketanserin, indicating that 5-HT2AR antagonism does not affect CBF.60 In the parietal cortex, psilocybin intake was associated with a statistically significantly larger decrease in CBF compared to that of ketanserin. These findings reinforce an acute modulation of CBF by psilocybin across many brain regions and directly map these changes onto acute pharmacological and subjective effects.

We provide the first evidence that both PPL and SDI, acquired at the time of each individual scan session, are significantly negatively correlated with global and regional CBF, reinforcing a close link between the acute effects of psilocybin, associated subjective effects, and CBF. Our observation that CBF is reduced following psilocybin administration is somewhat consistent with previous studies, but certain discrepancies are noteworthy.40–42 In a smaller sample of 15 healthy participants, Carhart-Harris and colleagues reported negative associations between perceptual effects of psilocybin and CBF in the ACC, PCC and thalamus.40 We observed similar negative associations between PPL and SDI and CBF within the ACC and PCC, regions often the focus of psychedelic resting-state fMRI literature stemming from being elements of the default-mode network and regions with high 5-HT2AR density.38,61–63 However, we did not observe significant associations between PPL nor SDI and thalamus CBF (see Table 1), the eponymous brain region for the thalamic gating model of psychedelic action.64,65 Our observation of a limited effect in the thalamus is seemingly consistent with a study by Lewis and colleagues, who report decreased CBF in 58 individuals, i.e., that which they report as “global CBF” or “gCBF”, in large clusters distributed across many brain regions including seemingly only a small subsection of only the left thalamus.41 Lewis and colleagues reported lower CBF following psilocybin administration within many regions, including the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital cortices, as well as the ACC. Although these observations are consistent with ours, they also reported significant reductions in CBF in the insula, caudate, putamen and amygdala.

We observed a statistically significant negative association between CBF and SDI (but not PPL) in the putamen, with numerically similar but non-significant associations in other subcortical regions. Although Lewis and colleagues reported lower CBF in the hippocampus and thalamus, these effects appear to be confined to relatively smaller subsections, which somewhat aligns with our findings of non-significant associations in these areas. There are notable sources of heterogeneity between the studies, which may explain the discrepant regional results: 1) Carhart-Harris and colleagues administered psilocybin intravenously, whereas Lewis and colleagues and we administered psilocybin perorally, i.e., as it is currently administered in clinical trials, 3 2) Carhart-Harris and colleagues estimated pulsed ASL, whereas Lewis and colleagues performed pcASL, as did we. Approximately half of our data were acquired with a 2D single-PLD sequence, similar to the sequence used by Lewis and colleagues, whereas the other half of our data were acquired with a 3D multi-PLD sequence. Nevertheless, despite regional and magnitude differences, our observation that global and regional CBF is reduced following psilocybin is generally consistent with the previous literature, which we show is significantly correlated with PPL and SDI.

Interestingly, we observed more brain regions showing a significant association between CBF and SDI than PPL and with higher statistical significance (see Table 1). This is qualitatively similar to what we observed when evaluating associations with resting-state functional connectivity in a subset of the current included participants (see Figure 3 from cit.46). Our estimated maximal change in CBF, i.e., model estimated decrease at peak observed PPL and SDI, was similar in most neocortical regions i.e. temporal, parietal and occipital, in the range: [−11% to −15.5%], but diverged in deeper brain structures, where the effect of PPL was in the range: [+1% to −13.9%] and SDI in the range [−5.2% to −14.5%]. SDI scores are more bimodally distributed than PPL, which may affect related statistical associations. Notably, 5-HT2AR occupancy by psilocin is related non-linearly to plasma psilocin levels.45 If we assume that most of the acute neural effects of psilocybin are due to 5HT2AR agonism, then mapping linear relations between plasma drug levels and neural changes, e.g., CBF, may inadequately capture the true relation between these variables. This may contribute to our observed differences in estimated associations with PPL and SDI; how best to model these associations should be evaluated further in future studies.

Although CBF was numerically decreased across brain regions following ketanserin administration, this effect was small, and not statistically significant (Table 2). Similarly, ketanserin produced negligible perceptual effects. Our lab previously showed with [11C]Cimbi-36 PET that 20 mg ketanserin produces ∼65-75% 5-HT2AR occupancy 1-3 hours after oral administration, near to its estimated maximal occupancy (i.e, 77%)66 and the maximal occupancy reported for other 5-HT2AR antagonists/inverse agonists.49,67,68 The observation that 5-HT2AR blockade with ketanserin at this occupancy level does not substantively affect CBF suggests that endogenous 5-HT2AR signalling at rest plays a limited role in regulating CBF. Directly comparing effects of psilocybin and ketanserin on CBF, we observed a statistically significant drug-x-time interaction effect within the parietal cortex such that the psilocybin-related decrease was greater (i.e., more negative) than the ketanserin-related change. The parietal cortex is the region wherein we observed the most pronounced negative association between CBF and both PPL and SDI, i.e., a decrease in CBF of ∼15% at peak drug and experience level. The parietal cortex contains regions involved in higher-order association networks including the default mode and frontoparietal networks, alterations in the functional connectivity of which have been linked to acute psychedelic effects.40 Although other regions in those networks showed directionally similar drug-x-time interaction effects, they were not statistically significant. We interpret the associations with PPL and SDI as supportive of a substantial psilocybin effect on CBF.

It is not immediately straight-forward how to reconcile the generally observed decrease in CBF with previous psilocybin studies evaluating effects on cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRglc) with [18F]-FDG PET. One previous study reported numerically decreased global but both increased (e.g., anterior cingulate) and decreased (e.g., thalamus) regional CMRglc following psilocybin administration in the context of a word repetition/association task.69 However, a second study that did not include any such task reported a global increase in CMRglc of ∼10-25%, most markedly in the frontal, anterior cingulate gyrus, and temporomedial cortex.44 This discrepancy is somewhat unexpected considering that CMRglc and CBF are normally tightly coupled.70,71 However, decoupling between CBF and CMRglc has been reported previously, e.g., caffeine has been shown to decrease CBF 72–75 and increase energy metabolism,76,77 and previous studies have speculated that psilocybin-induced reductions in CBF are not due to effects of stimulation of the neuronal 5-HT2ARs, but other receptor targets and direct effects on vascular tone.40,41 One possible explanation for the discrepancy between the current results and the previous reports of increased CMRglc following psilocybin ingestion could be the agonist activity of psilocybin at the inhibitory serotonin 1A receptor (5-HT1AR). The 5-HT1AR is expressed in various brain regions and acts both as an auto- and hetero-receptor and has, upon stimulation, been shown to lead to reduced cerebral blood volume in animal models.18,78,79

We also observed that ICA diameter was significantly negatively associated with both PPL and SDI, the first human in vivo evidence that psilocybin induces cerebral vasoconstriction. Our psilocybin observations are consistent with previous studies showing 5-HT2AR is expressed in the peripheral vasculature,29 where it induces vasoconstriction,30,32,80,81 and preclinical research shows 5-HT-induced vasoconstriction in the carotid arteries of rats.82,83 This highlights an important consideration for studies estimating CBF effects of 5-HT2AR agonist drugs: pcASL is inversely related to carotid blood flow velocity in a non-linear fashion, with the effects being most pronounced for increases in flow velocity.84,85 A psilocin-induced vasoconstriction could reduce the amount of arterial blood being labelled, thereby underestimating CBF. Additionally, both preclinical and clinical studies have shown that psilocybin can induce mild hyperthermia,86,87 which in animals induces carotid artery constriction.88 Based on our current observation and previously suggested best practice,89 future studies of psychedelic effects on CBF should measure vasoactive effects with, e.g., TOF angiography and phase-contrast mapping to directly measure ICA diameter and blood flow velocity, respectively. This will assist the interpretation of CBF effects and provide critical insights into the hemodynamic changes induced by these drugs.

Multimodal imaging techniques, such as simultaneous [18F]-FDG PET and pcASL, may also help resolve whether the apparent discrepancy between CMRglc and CBF reflects a decoupling of CBF from energy metabolism following psilocybin administration. Future studies using more selective 5-HT2AR agonists (such as the phenethylamine psychedelics90) and 5-HT1AR antagonists could help disentangle various sources of CBF alterations in CBF studies using polypharmacological drugs like psilocybin and ketanserin. These approaches would provide more detailed information about the relation between psilocybin, 5-HT2AR, and hemodynamic responses, clarifying the contributions of neuronal and non-neuronal factors to associated signals that are a common source of interest.3

One of the previous studies that evaluated acute psilocybin effects on CBF considered two analysis strategies, one of which involved adjusting for global CBF.41 This was motivated in part by a previous study advocating for this strategy.91 We did not apply this adjustment because our repeated measures model relates within individual changes in CBF to PPL or SDI, which we view as particularly desirable for assessing associated drug effects. It is also important to note that although we observed some grey-matter weighted CBF estimates outside the typically expected range of 40-80 ml/100g/min,89 most of our scans were within this range.

Our study is not without its limitations. Employing a double-blind design could have limited potential biases compared to our single-blind design. Notwithstanding, maintaining participant blinding in psychedelic studies is very difficult due to the intense subjective effects.4,11,17,95–97 Brain imaging data were collected across two scanners with distinct pcASL sequences (2D vs. 3D acquisition protocol) because MR1 became unavailable during the study and the MR1 sequence was not available on the MR2 scanner. These represent hardware and software sources of variation, which we adjust for by including scanner as a variable in our statistical models. This may potentially limit our ability to resolve drug-related effects. As we have discussed previously,12 hysteresis effects, i.e., different associations during the ascent and descent phases, cannot be ruled out; we do not have sufficient data to directly estimate hysteresis effects. We corrected for motion and excluded participants with excessive motion, yet it may remain a confound as head motion is increased while on psychedelics.40,95 Psilocybin has been found to increase body temperature, blood pressure, and heart rate. 87 Although changes in respiration, cardiac cycle, and end-tidal carbon dioxide during psilocybin sessions could potentially influence CBF, one previous study found that these factors did not significantly alter the CBF analysis. 40

Overall, we find that CBF decreases acutely following psilocybin administration and it is negatively associated with PPL and SDI. By contrast, ketanserin did not significantly affect CBF. ICA diameter significantly decreased following psilocybin, highlighting the need to resolve physiological mechanisms important for interpreting psychedelic effects on hemodynamic related signals. These findings add to our understanding of the neurobiological effects of psychedelic drugs and may have implications for their potential therapeutic uses in the treatment of brain disorders.

Data Availability

The MATLAB and R code used to generate the results presented in this study can be made available upon request. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study can be made available upon completion of a formal data-sharing agreement.

Author contributions

KL contributed to data analysis, visualisation, interpretation and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. UL contributed to data analysis. BO and DE-WM both contributed to data analysis and interpretation. SA contributed to guiding psilocybin interventions, and participant preparation and integration. AJ contributed to the protocol and data acquisition. DSS conceptualised the main psychological outcome of the study (SDI), study settings, and guided psilocybin interventions, participant preparation and integration. PMF, GMK and MKM, designed the study, wrote the protocol, and contributed to data collection, analysis and interpretation. All authors contributed substantially to interpretation and discussion of the study results, to critical review of the submitted manuscript, approval of the final version, and agreed to be both personally accountable for their own contributions and willing to participate in resolving any questions that may arise regarding the present paper.

Role of funding

The work was supported by Innovation Fund Denmark (grant number 4108–00004B), Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant number 6110–00518B and 9058-00017B), and Ester M. og Konrad Kristian Sigurdssons Dyreværnsfond (grant number 85022–55,166–17-LNG). KL was funded by Rigshospitalet (grant no.R259-A11532) MKM was supported through a stipend from Rigshospitalet’s Research Council (grant number R130A5324) and has received honoraria from Lundbeck Pharma and Lundbeck Foundation for teaching activity. BO has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 746,850. AJ was supported by the Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant ID 8020-00414B). Funding agencies did not impact the study and played no role in manuscript preparation and submission.

Declaration of competing interests

GMK served within the last three years as a speaker for Angelini, Abbvie, Cybin, and H. Lundbeck and as an advisor for Sanos, Onsero, Pangea Botanica, Gilgamesh, and Seaport.. DEM was supported by an unrestricted grant from COMPASS Pathways Ltd and has received honoraria as speaker for the Lundbeck Foundation and is a scientific advisor for Clerkenwell Health. MKM has advised Lobe Sciences. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1.
Supplementary Figure S1. Estimated receptor occupancy for ketanserin and psilocybin at +80 minutes post-drug.

This plot shows the estimated receptor occupancy (%) at 80 minutes after drug administration for ketanserin (red) and psilocybin (green). Each dot represents an individual participant’s estimated occupancy. The box plots display the median (horizontal line), interquartile range (box), and 1.5 times the interquartile range (whiskers). The black asterisks indicate the mean occupancy for each drug. Occupancy was estimated using plasma concentrations and the Emax model derived from our previous work.

Supplementary Figure S2.
Supplementary Figure S2. Associations between regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) and estimated receptor occupancy.

This figure shows the relationships between estimated receptor occupancy (%) and CBF (ml/100g/min) in four brain regions: Global CBF, Parietal, Occipital, and Temporal cortices. Each panel represents a different brain region, with estimated receptor occupancy on the x-axis and CBF on the y-axis. The black line in each panel indicates the fitted linear relation between occupancy and CBF, adjusted for age, sex, and scanner. Each coloured dot represents a single measurement from a unique participant. The β values shown in each panel represent the slope of the fitted line, indicating the change in CBF per unit increase in occupancy. The p or pFWER values indicate the statistical significance of the association, with pFWER values used for regional analyses to account for multiple comparisons.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the work of MRI assistants, Agnete Dyssegaard and Arafat Nasser for biobank management, and Oliver Overgaard-Hansen and Vibeke Dam for assistance in guiding psilocybin interventions. We thank Lone Freyr, Gerda Thomsen, Svitlana Olsen, Peter Jensen and Dorthe Givard for technical/administrative assistance. We also acknowledge the BAFA laboratory, University of Chemistry and Technology and the National Institute of Mental Health (Prague, Czech Republic) for production of psilocybin and Glostrup Apotek (Glostrup, Denmark) for encapsulation. We would like to thank Professor Fernando Calamante from the University of Sydney for his manuscript feedback related to pcASL imaging. We would like to thank the Department of Radiology at Rigshospitalet for MR1 scanner access. We would like to thank the Kirsten & Freddy Johansen (KFJ) Foundation for funding the MR2 scanner.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Carhart-Harris RL, Bolstridge M, Rucker J, et al. Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-label feasibility study. Lancet Psychiatry 2016; 3: 619–627.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.
    Davis AK, Barrett FS, May DG, et al. Effects of Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy on Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2021; 78: 481–489.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Goodwin GM, Aaronson ST, Alvarez O, et al. Single-Dose Psilocybin for a Treatment-Resistant Episode of Major Depression. N Engl J Med 2022; 387: 1637–1648.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Griffiths RR, Johnson MW, Carducci MA, et al. Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial. J Psychopharmacol Oxf Engl 2016; 30: 1181–1197.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Grob CS, Danforth AL, Chopra GS, et al. Pilot Study of Psilocybin Treatment for Anxiety in Patients With Advanced-Stage Cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68: 71–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Bogenschutz MP, Ross S, Bhatt S, et al. Percentage of Heavy Drinking Days Following Psilocybin-Assisted Psychotherapy vs Placebo in the Treatment of Adult Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2022; 79: 953–962.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    McCulloch DE-W, Grzywacz MZ, Madsen MK, et al. A Quantitative and Qualitative Report of Psilocybin Induced Mystical-Type Experiences and Their Relation to Lasting Positive Effects. Epub ahead of print 14 December 2021. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/xqzu2.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    Preller KH, Vollenweider FX. Phenomenology, Structure, and Dynamic of Psychedelic States. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2018; 36: 221–256.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Griffiths RR, Johnson MW, Richards WA, et al. Psilocybin occasioned mystical-type experiences: immediate and persisting dose-related effects. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2011; 218: 649–665.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    Griffiths R, Richards W, Johnson M, et al. Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psilocybin mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later. J Psychopharmacol Oxf Engl 2008; 22: 621–632.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Madsen MK, Fisher PM, Stenbæk DS, et al. A single psilocybin dose is associated with long-term increased mindfulness, preceded by a proportional change in neocortical 5-HT2A receptor binding. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 2020; 33: 71–80.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Stenbæk DS, Madsen MK, Ozenne B, et al. Brain serotonin 2A receptor binding predicts subjective temporal and mystical effects of psilocybin in healthy humans. J Psychopharmacol Oxf Engl 2021; 35: 459–468.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.
    MacLean KA, Johnson MW, Griffiths RR. Mystical experiences occasioned by the hallucinogen psilocybin lead to increases in the personality domain of openness. J Psychopharmacol Oxf Engl 2011; 25: 1453–1461.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.
    Erritzoe D, Roseman L, Nour MM, et al. Effects of psilocybin therapy on personality structure. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2018; 138: 368–378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.
    Griffiths RR, Richards WA, McCann U, et al. Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006; 187: 268–283; discussion 284-292.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Søndergaard A, Madsen MK, Ozenne B, et al. Lasting increases in trait mindfulness after psilocybin correlate positively with the mystical-type experience in healthy individuals. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 948729.
  17. 17.↵
    Horita A, Weber LJ. Dephosphorylation of Psilocybin to Psilocin by Alkaline Phosphatase. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1961; 106: 32–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Halberstadt AL, Geyer MA. Multiple receptors contribute to the behavioral effects of indoleamine hallucinogens. Neuropharmacology 2011; 61: 364–381.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Nichols DE. Psychedelics. Pharmacol Rev 2016; 68: 264–355.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Vollenweider FX, Vollenweider-Scherpenhuyzen MFI, Bäbler A, et al. Psilocybin induces schizophrenia-like psychosis in humans via a serotonin-2 agonist action. NeuroReport 1998; 9: 3897–3902.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Preller KH, Herdener M, Pokorny T, et al. The Fabric of Meaning and Subjective Effects in LSD-Induced States Depend on Serotonin 2A Receptor Activation. Curr Biol 2017; 27: 451–457.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.
    Kometer M, Schmidt A, Jäncke L, et al. Activation of serotonin 2A receptors underlies the psilocybin-induced effects on α oscillations, N170 visual-evoked potentials, and visual hallucinations. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 2013; 33: 10544–10551.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.
    Halberstadt AL, Geyer MA. Characterization of the head-twitch response induced by hallucinogens in mice: detection of the behavior based on the dynamics of head movement. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2013; 227: doi:10.1007/s00213-013-3006-z.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Quednow BB, Kometer M, Geyer MA, et al. Psilocybin-induced deficits in automatic and controlled inhibition are attenuated by ketanserin in healthy human volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012; 37: 630–640.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Becker AM, Klaiber A, Holze F, et al. Ketanserin Reverses the Acute Response to LSD in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study in Healthy Participants. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2022; 26: 97–106.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Varnäs K, Halldin C, Hall H. Autoradiographic distribution of serotonin transporters and receptor subtypes in human brain. Hum Brain Mapp 2004; 22: 246–260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.
    Miner L a. H, Backstrom JR, Sanders-Bush E, et al. Ultrastructural localization of serotonin2A receptors in the middle layers of the rat prelimbic prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience 2003; 116: 107–117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Jakab RL, Goldman-Rakic PS. 5-Hydroxytryptamine2A serotonin receptors in the primate cerebral cortex: possible site of action of hallucinogenic and antipsychotic drugs in pyramidal cell apical dendrites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95: 735–740.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Ullmer C, Schmuck K, Kalkman HO, et al. Expression of serotonin receptor mRNAs in blood vessels. FEBS Lett 1995; 370: 215–221.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    Nagatomo T, Rashid M, Abul Muntasir H, et al. Functions of 5-HT2A receptor and its antagonists in the cardiovascular system. Pharmacol Ther 2004; 104: 59–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Watts SW, Davis RP. 5-Hydroxtryptamine Receptors in Systemic Hypertension: an arterial focus. Cardiovasc Ther 2011; 29: 54–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Connor HE, Feniuk W, Humphrey PP. 5-Hydroxytryptamine contracts human coronary arteries predominantly via 5-HT2 receptor activation. Eur J Pharmacol 1989; 161: 91–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.
    Bax WA, Van Heuven-Nolsen D, Bos E, et al. 5-Hydroxytryptamine-induced contractions of the human isolated saphenous vein: involvement of 5-HT2 and 5-HT1D-like receptors, and a comparison with grafted veins. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 1992; 345: 500–508.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.
    Verheggen R, Freudenthaler S, Meyer-Dulheuer F, et al. Participation of 5-HT1-like and 5-HT2A receptors in the contraction of human temporal artery by 5-hydroxytryptamine and related drugs. Br J Pharmacol 1996; 117: 283–292.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.
    Yakovlev DS, Spasov AA, Mal’tsev DV, et al. Effect of 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonists on blood flow in the carotid vessels upon elevation of serotonin level. Bull Exp Biol Med 2014; 157: 350–352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    Mohammad-Zadeh LF, Moses L, Gwaltney-Brant SM. Serotonin: a review. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2008; 31: 187–199.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    McCulloch DE-W, Knudsen GM, Barrett FS, et al. Psychedelic resting-state neuroimaging: A review and perspective on balancing replication and novel analyses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2022; 138: 104689.
  38. 38.↵
    Vollenweider FX, Preller KH. Psychedelic drugs: neurobiology and potential for treatment of psychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 2020; 21: 611–624.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    Cumming P, Scheidegger M, Dornbierer D, et al. Molecular and Functional Imaging Studies of Psychedelic Drug Action in Animals and Humans. Mol Basel Switz 2021; 26: 2451.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    Carhart-Harris RL, Erritzoe D, Williams T, et al. Neural correlates of the psychedelic state as determined by fMRI studies with psilocybin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109: 2138–2143.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    Lewis CR, Preller KH, Kraehenmann R, et al. Two dose investigation of the 5-HT-agonist psilocybin on relative and global cerebral blood flow. NeuroImage 2017; 159: 70–78.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    Rieser NM, Gubser LP, Moujaes F, et al. Psilocybin-induced changes in cerebral blood flow are associated with acute and baseline inter-individual differences. Sci Rep 2023; 13: 17475.
  43. 43.↵
    Hermle L, Fünfgeld M, Oepen G, et al. Mescaline-induced psychopathological, neuropsychological, and neurometabolic effects in normal subjects: experimental psychosis as a tool for psychiatric research. Biol Psychiatry 1992; 32: 976–991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Vollenweider FX, Leenders KL, Scharfetter C, et al. Positron Emission Tomography and Fluorodeoxyglucose Studies of Metabolic Hyperfrontality and Psychopathology in the Psilocybin Model of Psychosis. Neuropsychopharmacology 1997; 16: 357–372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Madsen MK, Fisher PM, Burmester D, et al. Psychedelic effects of psilocybin correlate with serotonin 2A receptor occupancy and plasma psilocin levels. Neuropsychopharmacol Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 2019; 44: 1328–1334.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    Madsen MK, Stenbæk DS, Arvidsson A, et al. Psilocybin-induced changes in brain network integrity and segregation correlate with plasma psilocin level and psychedelic experience. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 2021; 50: 121–132.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    Olsen AS, Lykkebo-Valløe A, Ozenne B, et al. Psilocybin modulation of time-varying functional connectivity is associated with plasma psilocin and subjective effects. NeuroImage 2022; 264: 119716.
  48. 48.↵
    McCulloch DE-W, Olsen AS, Ozenne B, et al. Navigating the chaos of psychedelic neuroimaging: A multi-metric evaluation of acute psilocybin effects on brain entropy. 2023; 2023.07.03.23292164.
  49. 49.↵
    Ettrup A, da Cunha-Bang S, McMahon B, et al. Serotonin 2A receptor agonist binding in the human brain with [11C]Cimbi-36. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Off J Int Soc Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2014; 34: 1188–1196.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    Holze F, Madsen MK, Svarer C, et al. Ketanserin exhibits dose- and concentration-proportional serotonin 2A receptor occupancy in healthy individuals: Relevance for psychedelic research. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 2024; 88: 43–48.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.↵
    Kolaczynska KE, Liechti ME, Duthaler U. Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for the bioanalysis of psilocybin’s main metabolites, psilocin and 4-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid, in human plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2021; 1164: 122486.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, et al. FSL. NeuroImage 2012; 62: 782–790.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    Andersson JLR, Skare S, Ashburner J. How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. NeuroImage 2003; 20: 870–888.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 2004; 23 Suppl 1: S208–219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    Chappell MA, Groves AR, Whitcher B, et al. Variational Bayesian Inference for a Nonlinear Forward Model. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2009; 57: 223–236.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. 56.↵
    Buxton RB, Frank LR, Wong EC, et al. A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 383–396.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    Rolls ET, Huang C-C, Lin C-P, et al. Automated anatomical labelling atlas 3. NeuroImage 2020; 206: 116189.
  58. 58.↵
    Dmitrienko A, D’Agostino R. Traditional multiplicity adjustment methods in clinical trials. Stat Med 2013; 32: 5172–5218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    Xia M, Wang J, He Y. BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e68910.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    Olsen KS, Videbaek C, Schmidt JF, et al. The effect of ketanserin on cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity in healthy volunteers. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1992; 119: 7–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. 61.↵
    Andrews-Hanna JR, Smallwood J, Spreng RN. The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2014; 1316: 29–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.
    Nichols DE. Psilocybin: from ancient magic to modern medicine. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2020; 73: 679–686.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. 63.↵
    Beliveau V, Ganz M, Feng L, et al. A High-Resolution In Vivo Atlas of the Human Brain’s Serotonin System. J Neurosci 2017; 37: 120–128.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    Doss MK, Madden MB, Gaddis A, et al. Models of psychedelic drug action: modulation of cortical-subcortical circuits. Brain J Neurol 2022; 145: 441–456.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.↵
    Vollenweider FX, Geyer MA. A systems model of altered consciousness: integrating natural and drug-induced psychoses. Brain Res Bull 2001; 56: 495–507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. 66.↵
    Holze F, Madsen MK, Svarer C, et al. Ketanserin exhibits dose- and concentration-proportional serotonin 2A receptor occupancy in healthy individuals: Relevance for psychedelic research. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 2024; 88: 43–48.
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.↵
    Gründer G, Yokoi F, Offord SJ, et al. Time course of 5-HT2A receptor occupancy in the human brain after a single oral dose of the putative antipsychotic drug MDL 100,907 measured by positron emission tomography. Neuropsychopharmacol Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 1997; 17: 175–185.
    OpenUrl
  68. 68.↵
    Nordstrom A-L, Mansson M, Jovanovic H, et al. PET analysis of the 5-HT2A receptor inverse agonist ACP-103 in human brain. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2008; 11: 163–171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. 69.↵
    Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E, Schreckenberger M, Sabri O, et al. Neurometabolic effects of psilocybin, 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDE) and d-methamphetamine in healthy volunteers. A double-blind, placebo-controlled PET study with [18F]FDG. Neuropsychopharmacol Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 1999; 20: 565–581.
    OpenUrl
  70. 70.↵
    Buxton RB, Frank LR. A model for the coupling between cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism during neural stimulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Off J Int Soc Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1997; 17: 64–72.
    OpenUrl
  71. 71.↵
    Aubert A, Costalat R. A model of the coupling between brain electrical activity, metabolism, and hemodynamics: application to the interpretation of functional neuroimaging. NeuroImage 2002; 17: 1162–1181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  72. 72.↵
    Vidyasagar R, Greyling A, Draijer R, et al. The effect of black tea and caffeine on regional cerebral blood flow measured with arterial spin labeling. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Off J Int Soc Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2013; 33: 963–968.
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.
    Field AS, Laurienti PJ, Yen Y-F, et al. Dietary caffeine consumption and withdrawal: confounding variables in quantitative cerebral perfusion studies? Radiology 2003; 227: 129–135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  74. 74.
    Lunt MJ, Ragab S, Birch AA, et al. Comparison of caffeine-induced changes in cerebral blood flow and middle cerebral artery blood velocity shows that caffeine reduces middle cerebral artery diameter. Physiol Meas 2004; 25: 467–474.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  75. 75.↵
    Cameron OG, Modell JG, Hariharan M. Caffeine and human cerebral blood flow: a positron emission tomography study. Life Sci 1990; 47: 1141–1146.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  76. 76.↵
    Dager SR, Layton ME, Strauss W, et al. Human brain metabolic response to caffeine and the effects of tolerance. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 229–237.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  77. 77.↵
    Dager SR, Friedman SD. Brain imaging and the effects of caffeine and nicotine. Ann Med 2000; 32: 592–599.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  78. 78.↵
    Mueggler T, Razoux F, Russig H, et al. Mapping of CBV changes in 5-HT(1A) terminal fields by functional MRI in the mouse brain. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol J Eur Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 2011; 21: 344–353.
    OpenUrl
  79. 79.↵
    Sharp T, Barnes NM. Central 5-HT receptors and their function; present and future. Neuropharmacology 2020; 177: 108155.
  80. 80.↵
    Toda N, Okamura T. Comparison of the response to 5-carboxamidotryptamine and serotonin in isolated human, monkey and dog coronary arteries. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1990; 253: 676–682.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. 81.↵
    Kaumann AJ, Parsons AA, Brown AM. Human arterial constrictor serotonin receptors. Cardiovasc Res 1993; 27: 2094–2103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  82. 82.↵
    Watanabe S, Matsumoto T, Ando M, et al. Multiple activation mechanisms of serotonin-mediated contraction in the carotid arteries obtained from spontaneously hypertensive rats. Pflüg Arch - Eur J Physiol 2016; 468: 1271–1282.
    OpenUrl
  83. 83.↵
    Matsumoto T, Watanabe S, Taguchi K, et al. Mechanisms underlying increased serotonin-induced contraction in carotid arteries from chronic type 2 diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats. Pharmacol Res 2014; 87: 123–132.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. 84.↵
    Aslan S, Xu F, Wang PL, et al. ESTIMATION OF LABELING EFFICIENCY IN PSEUDO-CONTINUOUS ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING. Magn Reson Med Off J Soc Magn Reson Med Soc Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 765.
  85. 85.↵
    Chen Z, Zhang X, Yuan C, et al. Measuring the labeling efficiency of pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2017; 77: 1841–1852.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. 86.↵
    Erkizia-Santamaría I, Alles-Pascual R, Horrillo I, et al. Serotonin 5-HT2A, 5-HT2c and 5-HT1A receptor involvement in the acute effects of psilocybin in mice. In vitro pharmacological profile and modulation of thermoregulation and head-twich response. Biomed Pharmacother Biomedecine Pharmacother 2022; 154: 113612.
    OpenUrl
  87. 87.↵
    Holze F, Ley L, Müller F, et al. Direct comparison of the acute effects of lysergic acid diethylamide and psilocybin in a double-blind placebo-controlled study in healthy subjects. Neuropsychopharmacol Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol 2022; 47: 1180–1187.
    OpenUrl
  88. 88.↵
    Mustafa S, Thulesius O, Ismael HN. Hyperthermia-induced vasoconstriction of the carotid artery, a possible causative factor of heatstroke. J Appl Physiol Bethesda Md 1985 2004; 96: 1875–1878.
    OpenUrl
  89. 89.↵
    Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X, et al. Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia: Recommended Implementation of ASL for Clinical Applications. Magn Reson Med 2015; 73: 102–116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. 90.↵
    Pierce PA, Peroutka SJ. Hallucinogenic drug interactions with neurotransmitter receptor binding sites in human cortex. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1989; 97: 118–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. 91.↵
    Viviani R, Sim E-J, Lo H, et al. Components of variance in brain perfusion and the design of studies of individual differences: the baseline study. NeuroImage 2009; 46: 12–22.
    OpenUrl
  92. 92.
    Bogenschutz MP, Ross S, Bhatt S, et al. Percentage of Heavy Drinking Days Following Psilocybin-Assisted Psychotherapy vs Placebo in the Treatment of Adult Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2022; 79: 953–962.
    OpenUrl
  93. 93.
    Ross S, Bossis A, Guss J, et al. Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychopharmacol Oxf Engl 2016; 30: 1165–1180.
    OpenUrl
  94. 94.
    Gasser P, Holstein D, Michel Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of lysergic acid diethylamide-assisted psychotherapy for anxiety associated with life-threatening diseases. J Nerv Ment Dis 2014; 202: 513–520.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. 95.↵
    Carhart-Harris RL, Muthukumaraswamy S, Roseman L, et al. Neural correlates of the LSD experience revealed by multimodal neuroimaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113: 4853–4858.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top
Posted September 22, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Acute psilocybin and ketanserin effects on cerebral blood flow: 5-HT2AR neuromodulation in healthy humans
Kristian Larsen, Ulrich Lindberg, Brice Ozenne, Drummond E. McCulloch, Sophia Armand, Martin K. Madsen, Annette Johansen, Dea S. Stenbæk, Gitte M. Knudsen, Patrick M. Fisher
medRxiv 2024.09.19.24313958; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.19.24313958
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area