Abstract
In moral philosophy, two foundational approaches shape ethical decisions: deontology and utilitarianism, often exemplified by the “Trolley” dilemma. We conducted an experiment evaluating multiple LLMs, including OpenAI’s GPT-o1, across five medical versions of this dilemma. While some models adhered to established ethical standards, others inconsistently favored utilitarian outcomes, raising concerns about their alignment with human medical ethics. Careful evaluation of LLMs’ ethics in healthcare is warranted, to ensure their safe integration into clinical practice.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript