Targeted long-read sequencing as a single assay improves diagnosis of spastic-ataxia disorders

Laura Ivete Rudaks, Igor Stevanovski, Dennis Yeow, Andre L. M. Reis, Sanjog R. Chintalaphani, Pak Leng Cheong, Hasindu Gamaarachchi, Lisa Worgan, Kate Ahmad, Michael Hayes, Andrew Hannaford, Samuel Kim, Victor S. C. Fung, Michael Halmagyi, Andrew Martin, David Manser, Michel Tchan, Karl Ng, Marina L. Kennerson, Ira W. Deveson, Kishore Raj Kumar
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.04.24312938

Abstract

The hereditary spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders are a group of rare disabling neurological diseases. The genetic testing process is complex, and often requires multiple different assays to evaluate the many potential causative genes and variant types, including short tandem repeat expansions, single nucleotide variants, insertions/deletions, structural variants and copy number variants. This can be a protracted process and, even after all avenues are exhausted, many individuals do not receive a genetic diagnosis.

Aiming to streamline and improve this process, we developed a targeted long-read sequencing strategy with capacity to characterise genetic variation of all types and sizes within 469 disease-associated genes, in a single assay. We applied this to a cohort of 34 individuals with genetically undiagnosed spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders. An additional five individuals with a known genetic diagnosis were included as positive controls.

We identified causative pathogenic variants that would be sufficient for genetic diagnosis in 14/34 (41%) unsolved participants. The success rate was 5/11 (45%) in those who were naïve to genetic testing and 9/23 (39%) in those who were undiagnosed after prior genetic testing, completed on a clinical basis. Short tandem repeat expansions in FGF14 were the most common cause, present in 7/34 (21%). Two individuals (2/34, 6%) had biallelic pathogenic short tandem repeat expansions in RFC1 and one individual had a monoallelic pathogenic short tandem repeat expansion in ATXN8OS/ATXN8. Causative pathogenic sequence variants other than short tandem repeat expansions were found in four individuals, including a heterozygous missense variant in VCP, a heterozygous in-frame deletion in STUB1, a homozygous splicing variant in ANO10, and compound heterozygous missense and nonsense variants in SPG7. In addition to these solved cases, a pathogenic or likely-pathogenic variant with uncertain clinical implications was identified in a further three individuals, including a single individual who was found to have a short tandem repeat expansion in BEAN1 in addition to biallelic expansions in FGF14 within the range of 200-249 repeats.

Our results demonstrate the utility of targeted long-read sequencing in the genetic evaluation of patients with spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders, highlighting both the capacity to increase overall diagnostic yield and to streamline the testing pathway by capturing all known genetic causes in a single assay.

Introduction

The hereditary spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders are a group of rare, disabling neurologic conditions encompassing the phenotypic spectrum from pure ataxia, mixed spastic-ataxia to spastic paraparesis1 with combined global prevalence estimated at 9.8/100,0002. Although historically, hereditary cerebellar ataxia (HCA) and hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) have been classified separately on a clinicogenetic basis, with the discovery of an increasing number of genes causing overlapping phenotypes and shared disease mechanisms, it has been proposed that these disorders be considered as part of a spastic-ataxia spectrum disorder3. There are numerous causative genes and variant types, which have typically necessitated the use of a combination of different genetic testing methods for identification. This includes Southern blot or repeat-primed PCR for short tandem repeat (STR) expansions; next-generation sequencing (NGS) (including targeted gene panels, whole exome sequencing [WES] or whole genome sequencing [WGS]) to evaluate conventional variants (single nucleotide variants [SNVs], insertions/deletions [indels] and structural variants [SVs]); and subsequent consideration for additional tests, such as multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for larger copy number variants (CNVs) that may not be detected by NGS4–7. However, despite advances in genetic testing methods and broader access to NGS, up to 71% of individuals with HCA and 45-50% of individuals with a HSP phenotype currently do not receive a genetic diagnosis1,6,8–12.

There are several potential contributors to this ‘diagnostic gap’. STR expansions, evaluated by repeat-primed PCR or Southern blot, require specific primers/probes for each gene5. Typically, only the most common STR expansions are evaluated as part of a ‘SCA panel’, the content of which may vary between sites, whilst other less common or recently described STR expansions may be overlooked. Furthermore, potentially relevant genes may be omitted from targeted testing of a narrow phenotype-specific gene set, which is particularly relevant in cases with less ‘classic’ or atypical phenotypic features. Certain genetic variants are challenging to detect with NGS, such as SVs or any variant within a repetitive genomic region13. Targeted gene sequencing and WES are unable to identify deep intronic variants14. Short-read NGS is also generally unsuitable for phasing variants onto maternal vs paternal alleles, for example, to establish compound heterozygosity in the absence of parental sequencing data13. There may also be issues with access or availability of genetic testing, especially for more recently described STR expansion disorders. For instance, presently in Australia, clinically accredited testing for STR expansions in FGF14 or RFC1, which cause late-onset ataxia4, is not available locally.

Long-read sequencing (LRS) is an emerging group of genomic technologies, which overcome several limitations posed by earlier methods, including NGS13. LRS provides improved detection of STR expansions, SVs and CNVs; ability to resolve repetitive regions and homologous gene families or gene-pseudogene pairs; variant phasing without parental sequencing data; and DNA methylation profiling at no additional cost13. LRS is particularly advantageous for genotyping STR expansions, where it can clearly identify expansion size, sequence, methylation state and zygosity, even for large, complex or GC/AT-rich repeats. These capabilities are critical for evaluating genes where different STR motif conformations can affect pathogenicity; for example, 12 different RFC1 STR expansion motifs have been identified, some of which are pathogenic and others benign4,15. LRS also allows identification of repeat interruptions or flanking genetic variation that can modify penetrance and prognosis16,17.

The adaptive sampling or ‘ReadUntil’ functionality on LRS instruments from Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) enables selective sequencing of specific genes using genetic coordinates provided programmatically and without the need for additional laboratory processes for target enrichment18. Targeted LRS can be used to evaluate a large number of STRs in a single test and has demonstrated success in concurrent testing of a set of 37 genes associated with neurologic disease16 as well as concurrent evaluation of 10 STR loci associated with ataxia15. Although these studies establish the analytical validity of this approach for detection of STR expansions, they did not examine non-STR causative variants for ataxia/neurologic disease, nor assess the capacity of LRS to solve otherwise undiagnosed patients.

Given the capacity to evaluate a broad variety of genes and genetic variant types in a single streamlined assay, we reasoned that ONT targeted LRS could be used to improve the diagnosis of spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders. To test this, we designed a targeted assay for evaluation of STR expansions, SNVs, indels, SVs and CNVs across all diagnostically relevant genes (n = 469). We applied this to a cohort of genetically undiagnosed patients with a spastic-ataxia spectrum phenotype and assessed the potential to improve the rate of diagnosis, relative to traditional testing. Here we report the clinical and genetic findings from this cohort, demonstrating a strong improvement in diagnostic rate and highlighting the strengths of LRS for genetic evaluation of these disorders.

Materials and methods

Patient recruitment, clinical evaluation and study approval

A cohort of 34 patients with clinically diagnosed spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders, without a genetic diagnosis, were recruited from the Neuromuscular Clinic at Concord Repatriation General Hospital in Sydney, Australia, between April 2023 and March 2024. The cohort consisted of 11 individuals who were naïve to genetic testing and 23 individuals who had previously undertaken genetic testing, as per standard clinical practice in Australia. Prior genetic testing had been arranged by the patients’ treating clinicians, and included various combinations of testing for STR expansions in selected spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) genes (SCA 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 12, 17), FXN for Friedreich ataxia, ATN1 for dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy, FMR1 for Fragile X Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome (FXTAS); NGS (targeted gene panel, WES or WGS); and auxiliary testing (single gene testing, MLPA, microarray, mitochondrial genome sequencing), as appropriate. An additional five individuals with spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders and a known genetic diagnosis were included as positive controls. Demographic, clinical, neuroimaging, neurophysiological and genetic testing data were collected at the time of clinical evaluations and from patient health care records. MRI and/or CT reports, as well as original images, if available, were reviewed. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Study approval for this project was provided by the local Human Research Ethics Committee (2019/ETH12538).

Targeted long-read sequencing workflow

Peripheral blood samples were obtained from all 39 individuals (34 study participants and five controls). Samples were processed at The Garvan Institute of Medical Research in Sydney, Australia. High–molecular weight (HMW) genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples using the Nanobind CBB kit (PacBio, Cat# 102-301-900). HMW genomic DNA was sheared to ∼30-kb fragment size using the Diagenode Megaruptor 3 DNA shearing system and visualised on an Agilent Femto Pulse using the Genomic DNA 165 kb Kit. ONT libraries were prepared from ∼3 µg of sheared HMW genomic DNA using a ligation prep (SQK-NBD114.24). Three samples were barcoded and pooled into one library and loaded on an ONT PromethION R10.4.1 flow cell (FLO-PRO114M) and sequenced on either a PromethION 2 Solo or PromethION 48 instrument, with live target selection/rejection executed by the Readfish software package (v0.0.10dev2)18 targeting a custom panel of 469 genes associated with spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders, plus the mitochondrial genome (Supplementary Table 1). Libraries were run for 72 hours, with nuclease flushes and library reloading performed at approximately 24 and 48-hour time points.

Analysis of genetic variation

Raw ONT sequencing data was converted to BLOW5 format19 and base-called with Dorado, using the ‘super-accuracy’ model (dna_r10.4.1_e8.2_400bps_5khz_sup_prom.cfg) and the Buttery-eel wrapper to enable BLOW5 input20. The resulting ‘pass’ FASTQ files were aligned to both the hg38 and T2T-CHM13v2.0 reference genomes using minimap2 (v2.14-r883)21. SNVs and indels were called using Clair3 (v1.0.4)22 and phased using WhatsHap (v2.1)23. SVs (including CNVs) were called with Sniffles224 (v2.07), which takes haplotagged BAM alignment files to generate phased SV calls. SNVs and indels were functionally annotated using Variant Effect Predictor (VEP)25 (v110) and SVs were annotated using AnnotSV26 (v3.3.4).

Variants were prioritized for further consideration based on the following criteria: (i) those annotated in ClinVar with a clinical significance of “pathogenic,” “likely pathogenic,” or “uncertain“; (ii) variants predicted to cause a frameshift; (iii) missense variants with a REVEL score greater than 0.5 and classified as “pathogenic”, “likely pathogenic”, “uncertain” or without an assigned clinical significance; and (iv) variants with high or moderate impact that are similarly classified as “pathogenic”, “likely pathogenic”, “uncertain” or lacking an assigned clinical significance in ClinVar. All pre-selected variants were within MANE Select transcripts and either were not found in gnomADv4 or had allele frequency of less than 0.1, resulting in a list of rare and potentially causative variants. Additionally, structural variants intersecting protein-coding genes were also prioritized for further consideration.

Analysis of STR expansions

We analysed STRs in 21 genes associated with spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders (Supplementary Table 2). During this project, STR expansions in THAP11 and ZFHX3, were identified to cause HCA27–29, and these genes were subsequently added to our target panel. All individuals underwent sequencing of THAP11, however, 24 samples had already undergone sequencing prior to the addition of ZFHX3, and therefore, these individuals were not evaluated for SCA4. Furthermore, TBP was omitted from the initial panel, and therefore also was only evaluated in 15/39 samples.

STRs were genotyped using a method demonstrated previously16. Each STR region was first inspected in Integrated Genome Viewer (IGV; T2T-CHM13v2 reference)30. For sites showing evidence of expansions (i.e. large insertions within alignments spanning an STR site), reads were retrieved within a 50kb window centred on the target STR and assembled de novo with Flye (v2.8.1-b1676)31 to create a pseudo-haploid contig encompassing the STR region. The starting reads were then realigned to this contig and phased into separate haplotypes using Longshot (v0.4.1)32. The initial assembled contig was re-polished with reads from each haplotype using Racon (v1.4.0), generating two distinct haploid contigs encompassing the STR site. The precise position of the STR site was identified by mapping 150-bp unique flanking sequences extracted from T2T-CHM13v2.0 using minimap2 (v2.22). The reads from each haplotype were mapped to their respective polished contigs and re-inspected in IGV to identify potential discrepancies in phasing of reads, which could be manually corrected before re-polishing30. Custom sequence bar plots were created in Prism to enable visualisation of STR alleles within and between patients (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Improved diagnosis of spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders with targeted long-read sequencing.

(A) Summary of genetic diagnoses in our cohort of 34 genetically undiagnosed patients with spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders. (B) Sequence bar charts show STR alleles identified in 13 patients with expanded STRs in FGF14. Seven individuals, denoted with asterisks, had pure (GAA) expansions longer than 250 copies, sufficient for SCA27B diagnosis. The remaining six patients had (GAA) expansions that did not reach 250 copies, or expanded (GAA) repeats interrupted by other motifs (GCA or GGA), not considered pathogenic. (C) Genome browser view shows detection of two pathogenic heterozygous variants within SPG7 in a single patient. Alignments are phased into separate haplotypes (pink = haplotype 1; blue = haplotype 2), confirming the two pathogenic variants are on alternative haplotypes (i.e. in trans).

Validation of results

Our analysis method for genotyping STR expansions with ONT data has previously been validated in a cohort of 37 individuals including patients with neurogenetic diseases, premutation carriers and controls16. In the present study, five individuals with a known genetic diagnosis were included as positive controls: one individual with FXTAS due to a FMR1 STR expansion; one with SCA3 due to a ATXN3 STR expansion, one with HSP due to homozygous SPG7 variants; one with recessive ataxia due to compound heterozygous variants in ANO10; and one with recessive ataxia due to compound heterozygous variants in TDP2. In nine individuals with a potential new genetic diagnosis identified using LRS, findings were confirmed on orthogonal testing completed in laboratories independent to the primary research testing centre. This was undertaken in clinically accredited laboratories for eight individuals, and one individual had completed WGS on a research basis.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative variables were described as means and ranges. Categorical variables were expressed with frequencies and percentages. Comparison of groups was undertaken using independent samples X2 testing for binomial variables. Statistical significance threshold was set at p-value <0.05.

Data availability

Anonymised data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Results

Targeted LRS assay for spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders

We developed an ONT ReadUntil targeted LRS assay18 designed to capture the full suite of genetic features implicated in spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders in a single assay. This encompasses 469 genes considered diagnostically relevant plus the mitochondrial genome (Supplementary Table 1). Genes included in the targeted panel were selected via detailed literature review4 and review of gene panels for ataxia, spastic-ataxia and HSP through PanelApp, and other genetic testing laboratories including Invitae, Blueprint Genetics, PathWest and VCGS33. We designed target regions covering each gene and flanking regions 50 kb upstream and downstream to ensure all exons, introns, gene promoters, untranslated regions (UTRs) and other local regulatory sequences are captured. This panel covers STR sites in 21 genes where expanded alleles are known to cause spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders (Supplementary Table 2). In total, the target panel covers 91.8 Mbases or 3.0% of the human genome sequence.

Targeted LRS enables multiple patient samples to be analysed in a single experiment to reduce cost, while still obtaining sufficient coverage depth for accurate and comprehensive analysis. Our study cohort (see below) was sequenced at a rate of three patients per flow cell (ONT PromethION). We obtained median 42-fold coverage depth across target gene regions, with a median absolute deviation (MAD) of 16.79. The coverage depth across individual target regions ranged from a minimum median coverage of 23 to a maximum median coverage of 50 (Supplementary Figure 1A,B).

To validate our approach, positive controls were analysed by blinded investigators (see Materials & Methods). Our targeted ONT LRS approach identified STR expansions in FMR1 and ATXN3 in patients with known FXTAS and SCA3, respectively, with relatively similar repeat lengths identified compared to that generated by standard clinical testing (85 vs 87 copies for FMR1; 73 vs 76 for ATXN3; Supplementary Figure 2A-B). Additionally, ONT LRS was able to identify the presence and position of two AGG interruptions within the FMR1 CGG STR expansion (Supplementary Figure 2B). The presence of AAG interruptions are known to influence the propensity of the FMR1 CGG STR expansion to further expand in subsequent generations34. We were able to successfully identify SNVs and small indels in 3 positive control patients with recessive spastic ataxic disorders (Supplementary Figure 2A,C). Our ONT LRS approach also allowed for phasing of these variants, confirming that a patient with an apparently homozygous SNV in SPG7 did have the same variant on two different alleles and confirming that patients with two variants in ANO10 and TDP2 carried these variants in trans (Supplementary Figure 2C). Interestingly, the patient with known autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia due to variants in TDP2 was also found to carry a (GAA)240 STR expansion in FGF14, which is close to the (GAA)250 threshold that is currently considered pathogenic.

Cohort characteristics

We evaluated the performance of our targeted LRS strategy on a cohort of 34 patients with genetically undiagnosed spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders, in addition to five positive controls (see above). In the study cohort, mean age of individuals at the time of review was 64.0 years (range 24-84), with mean age of onset 53.0 years (range one month to 80 years) and mean disease duration of 10.9 years (range 1-37 years). 16/34 (47%) were female. The majority (20/34, 59%) were white/European; 2/34 (6%) Lebanese; 1/34 (3%) each of Chinese, Filippino, Indian and Iraqi; 2/34 (6%) were of mixed backgrounds; whilst ancestry was unknown in 6/34 (18%). A family history of a similar phenotype was present in 12/34 (35%); inheritance was presumed to be autosomal dominant in 11/34 (32%) and autosomal recessive in 1/34 (3%). The predominant clinical phenotypic classification was ataxia in 29/34 (85%), spastic-ataxia in 3/34 (9%) and spastic paraparesis in 2/34 (6%) (Table 1).

View this table:
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with genetically undiagnosed spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders

Genetic findings

Our targeted LRS strategy identified a causative pathogenic variant sufficient for diagnosis in 14/34 (41%) of participants (Figure 1A). In the group who had previously undergone unsuccessful genetic testing, a diagnosis was obtained in 9/23 (39%) participants, whilst a diagnosis was obtained in 5/11 (45%) who were naive to genetic testing. A heterozygous GAA-FGF14 STR expansion ≥250 repeats, consistent with a diagnosis of SCA27B, was identified in 7/34 (21%) of the study cohort and was found in 5/23 (22%) of the testing-negative group (Figure 1B). RFC1 CANVAS/spectrum disorder due to biallelic RFC1 STR expansions was identified in 2/34 (6%). A single individual was identified to have each of: a CAG·CTG STR expansion in ATXN8/ATXN8OS; a homozygous splicing variant in ANO10 (c.1163-9A>G); a heterozygous missense variant in VCP (c.475C>T, p.Arg159Cys); a heterozygous in-frame deletion in STUB1 (c.433_435del, p.Lys145del); one instance of compound heterozygous missense and nonsense variants in SPG7 (c.1045G>A, p.Gly349Ser and c.861dup, p.Asn288Ter; Supplementary Figure 3A-D). For the latter case, variants were phased with LRS without parental sequencing data. The 75.7 kb phased block contained six additional heterozygous variants between the two variants of interest, supported by 23 long reads, providing robust evidence to establish compound heterozygosity (Figure 1C). Genetic and clinical features for individuals with a positive diagnosis are summarised in Supplementary Table 3.

This left 20/34 (59%) of individuals without a genetic diagnosis. Two of these individuals were found to harbour pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in GCH1 and PRRT2, respectively, although these findings were of uncertain clinical relevance to the cerebellar ataxia phenotype. A further individual was identified to have a STR expansion in BEAN1 in addition to biallelic STR expansions in FGF14, within the range of 200-249 repeats. It is likely that one or both of these are the causative genetic events for this patient, however, we currently consider this outcome to be uncertain (see below). Overall, one or more variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were identified in 6/20 (30%) of individuals without an identified causative variant (Supplementary Table 4).

To validate our findings, eight individuals (patients 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12 and 13) underwent confirmatory testing through an independent clinically accredited laboratory. One further individual (patient 11) had previously undergone WGS on a research basis and data was available for reanalysis. Five individuals with FGF14 STR expansions, as well as one individual with biallelic RFC1 STR expansions underwent confirmatory testing with standard flanking PCR and repeat-primed PCR, followed by capillary electrophoresis. Results demonstrated similar GAA repeat lengths between the two methods and in all cases the pathogenicity of expansions were correctly classified (Supplementary Table 5). The biallelic RFC1 AAGGG STR expansion identified in patient 8 was also confirmed with standard flanking PCR and repeat-primed PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis, although the specific repeat length was not reported. The homozygous ANO10 variant identified in patient 12, and the heterozygous VCP variant identified in patient 13 were confirmed on clinically accredited WES. The STUB1 in-frame deletion in patient 11 was confirmed on retrospective review of prior research WGS data, and further confirmatory testing with a clinically accredited WES is pending.

Clinical findings

FGF14-GAA (SCA27B); demographic and clinical features

A total of 7/34 (21%) individuals were identified to have GAA≥250 FGF14 STR expansions, consistent with a diagnosis of SCA27B. Mean GAA repeat length was 348 repeats (range 274-425, SD +/−56) (Figure 1B). All seven individuals were male. Ancestry was known in 6/7 (86%) individuals, with white/European ancestry in all known cases. An autosomal dominant family history was apparent in 3/7 (43%) of individuals, with maternal inheritance in all cases. Mean age at examination was 75.4 years (range 69-81), mean age of onset was 65.3 years (range 53-75) and mean disease duration was 10.1 years (range 6-20). 4/7 (57%) required a mobility aid (stick 2/4 and walker 2/4), with a mean time to mobility aid requirement of 5.8 years from disease onset (range 4-10). Mean SARA score was 11.6 (range 6.5-18). Clinical features of all genetically diagnosed patients, and those with SCA27B specifically, are indicated in Figure 2A,B.

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Clinical features of spastic-ataxia patients receiving a genetic diagnosis via long-read sequencing.

(A) Chart provides an overview of clinical characteristics for all patients who received a genetic diagnosis (plus patient#15, for whom two possible pathogenic STR expansions were detected). The upper bar chart shows patient ages at time of analysis (yellow) and their age at symptom onset (green). The heatmap below indicates symptoms identified in each patient (blue = positive; white = negative; grey = not assessed). Patient sex is encoded with blue (male) or pink (female) tiles and genetic diagnoses are coded as follows: FGF14 = red; RFC1 = yellow; ATXN8 = orange; STUB1 = navy; VCP = blue; ANO10 = purple; SPG7 = green; BEAN1 and biallelic FGF14 (uncertain clinical significance) = grey. Patients with SCA27B are sorted by FGF14 expansion size, in matched order to Figure 1B. (B) Bar chart summarises the frequency of clinical phenotypes observed among patients diagnosed with SCA27B, based on STR expansions in FGF14 (n = 7 patients).

Non-pathogenic FGF14 STR expansions

Four individuals were identified to have non-canonical interrupted GAA FGF14 STR expansions, three of which were ≥250 copies in length (Figure 1B). The longest was a mixed GAA/GCA expansion of 616 repeats, with a maximal uninterrupted GAA length of 195 repeats, while two patients had mixed GAA/GGA repeats with total repeat lengths of 440 and 330, respectively. None of these non-canonical alleles contained an uninterrupted stretch of ≥250 GAA copies and, as a result, none were considered to be pathogenic.

Two further participants, as well as one of the positive controls, were found to have GAA repeats in the 200-249 range (Figure 1B). Patient 13 had a STR expansion of 213 pure GAA repeats, in addition to the non-pathogenic mixed 440 GAA/GGA repeat. This individual was identified to have a pathogenic variant in VCP, with a matching phenotype, and the FGF14 GAA213 STR expansion was not felt to be contributory to his presentation. The other individual was identified to have both a biallelic FGF14 GAA repeat expansion, with 213/201 repeats, as well as a STR expansion in BEAN1, both of which may contribute to their phenotype. This case is discussed in detail below.

RFC1-CANVAS; clinical and genetic features

RFC1-CANVAS was identified in two individuals. Both presented with the full CANVAS syndrome including cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy and vestibular areflexia, with additional clinical features indicated in Supplementary Table 3. Patient 8 was of white/European background and had biallelic (AAGGG)n expansions, with 651 and 693 repeats. The second individual (patient 9), from the Philippines, was compound heterozygous for an (AAGGG)1000 expansion and an (ACAGG)2000 expansion.

Non-pathogenic RFC1 STR expansions

Two individuals had monoallelic RFC1 (AAGGG)n expansions of 483 and 440 repeats respectively (Figure 2A). Prior reports have identified that compound heterozygosity with a RFC1 (AAGGG)n expansion and a truncating variant can cause RFC1-CANVAS35,36. However, ONT LRS sequencing data did not identify a second hit in either of these two cases.

Two suspicious STR expansions (FGF14/BEAN1) in the same individual

A man of European background presented with sporadic late-onset ataxia from age 66-70 years. The year prior to symptom onset, the patient had suffered a stroke with residual speech and swallow impairment. He had a single episode of vertigo at age 66-70, attributed to benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, but episodic features were not otherwise reported. Two years post symptom onset, he required use of a walker, and after a further year, commenced using a wheelchair. On examination, he had down-beat nystagmus, saccadic pursuit, dysmetric saccades, dysarthria, upper limb dysmetria, dysdiadochokinesia, heel-shin ataxia and an ataxic gait. Head impulse test was positive to the left. MRI demonstrated generalized cerebral and cerebellar atrophy, in addition to mineral deposition in the basal ganglia and a chronic infarct in the posterior limb of the left internal capsule. ONT LRS identified a STR expansion in BEAN1 consisting of (TAAAA)50(TGGAA)226(TAAAA)120(TGGAA)110(TAAAA)75, as well as a biallelic FGF14 STR expansion with 213/201 GAA repeats.

The pathogenic insertion in BEAN1 consists of complex penta-nucleotide repeats, including (TGGAA)n, (TAGAA)n and (TAAAA)n, followed by (TAAAATAGAA)n, with the (TGGAA)n component thought to be causative for disease37. It is one of the most common causes of autosomal dominant SCA in Japan, but has only been rarely reported elsewhere, including in individuals from China, Taiwan, Korea, and in a Brazilian family with Japanese ancestry38. To our knowledge, the pathogenic BEAN1 expansion has not been previously reported as causing ataxia in an individual of European ethnic background, therefore the clinical relevance of this finding was considered uncertain. Additionally, the FGF14-GAA 200-249 alleles were significantly enriched in patients with downbeat nystagmus compared to controls, with a similar phenotype compared to patients carrying a (GAA)≥250 expansion39. However, the relevance of the 200-249 expansion is still considered uncertain and requires large-scale studies to confirm the clinical significance39. Finally, there is a suggestion that biallelic GAA alleles <250 repeats might be associated with disease40 but will also require publication of further cases. Overall, it was uncertain whether the genetic findings in BEAN1 and FGF14 were causative or contributing to the clinical phenotype in this individual.

Clinically-relevant sequencing variants

We identified clinically-relevant sequencing variants in the VCP and STUB1 genes in unsolved participants (Figure 1A, 2A).

The VCP variant carrier (patient 13), a man in his 60s of white/European ancestry, presented with features of complex hereditary spastic paraplegia (Supplementary Table 3). He had a history of osteoporosis, migraines and had previously suffered a right cerebellar stroke, with complete symptomatic recovery. There were no cognitive symptoms. Family history revealed that one of his parents had mobility issues and dementia, and his sibling had frontotemporal dementia. MRI demonstrated a small right chronic cerebellar infarct. Cortical excitability studies using threshold tracking transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were performed, demonstrating normal short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI). Abnormal SICI is a biomarker of inhibitory GABAergic circuit dysfunction41. There are no publications on the use of TMS in VCP-containing protein disease, however reduced SICI, implying cortical hyper-excitability, is reported in other TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) proteinopathies, such as ALS and FTLD. A dual-phase whole-body bone scan did not demonstrate scintigraphic evidence of Paget’s disease. ONT LRS identified a pathogenic missense variant in VCP (c.475C>T, p.Arg159Cys). This was confirmed on clinically accredited WES and has been previously reported42.

Patient 11, the STUB1 variant carrier, a lady in her 80s of European ancestry presented with autosomal dominant ataxia, with similar features reported in one of her parents and mild features in her child. Clinical features are indicated in Supplementary Table 3. ONT LRS identified an in-frame deletion in STUB1 (c.433_435del). Prior SCA17 testing had identified normal TBP repeat length (35/36 repeats). The patient had previously undergone WGS, and data was retrospectively reviewed, with confirmation of the STUB1 variant. Since the time WGS was originally undertaken, additional cases with the same STUB1 variant have been published, permitting classification of the variant as likely pathogenic5,43.

Sequencing variants of uncertain clinical relevance

Variants in the GCH1 and PRRT2 genes were identified in unsolved participants (Supplementary Table 4), despite follow-up examinations the clinical relevance was unclear.

The GCH1 variant carrier was a lady in her 60s, of mixed ancestry, who presented with progressive balance decline, dizziness and an upper limb tremor from age 61-65. There was no family history of similar features. Dizziness was constant, with exacerbations triggered by crowds or emotion, lasting 5-40 minutes, as well as brief instantaneous exacerbations with turning the head. On examination there were mild features of ataxia, with saccadic pursuit, horizontal gaze-evoked nystagmus, intention tremor, mild heel-shin ataxia and a wide-based gait. Head-impulse testing was negative. Sensory examination demonstrated mild distal sensory impairment in the lower limbs. There was a jerky tremor of the upper limbs, most notably with certain postures, suspected to reflect a dystonic tremor. There were no other extrapyramidal features. ONT LRS identified a variant in GCH1 (c.671A>G, p.Lys224Arg), classified as likely pathogenic. Additional VUS were identified in KCNA1 (c.368G>A, p.Gly123Asp) and TTBK2 (c.3485G>A, p.Arg1162His).

The PRRT2 variant carrier, a man in his 50s, with European ancestry, presented with a complex neurologic disorder of ten year duration. He had a family history of dementia in one parent and in one of their parents. Features included fasciculations, spasticity, hyperreflexia and mild distal weakness of upper and lower limbs, cerebellar features (gaze-evoked nystagmus, saccadic pursuit, dysmetric saccades, dysarthria and upper and lower limb ataxia), upper limb bradykinesia and a mild rest tremor. Gait was broad-based, with slow initiation and shuffling steps. He reported autonomic features (erectile dysfunction and urinary urgency) and although not formally tested, cognitive decline was suspected, with difficulties processing complex information, and a tendency to burst into laughter with cognitive loading, suggestive of pseudobulbar affect. MRI demonstrated diffuse cerebral involution without disproportionate cerebellar atrophy. NCS revealed a sensorimotor polyneuropathy, and EMG showed chronic neurogenic changes in limb and cranial nerve-innervated muscles. Motor evoked potentials revealed marked dysfunction of central motor pathways to all limbs. During investigation, the patient was also identified to have positive CASPR2 antibodies on blood testing, which were negative on CSF. This finding was of uncertain significance, but the patient was trialled on intravenous immunoglobulin and mycophenolate without significant response. ONT LRS identified a variant in PRRT2 (c.649dup, p.Arg217ProfsTer8), which was classified as pathogenic although is of uncertain clinical significance in this case. An additional VUS was identified in SPTBN2 (c.6250G>A, p.Glu2084Lys).

Discussion

Our study evaluated 34 patients with genetically undiagnosed spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders using targeted ONT LRS and identified a likely diagnosis in 14/34 (41%; summarised in Figure 3). In the group who had not previously undergone genetic testing, the diagnostic yield was 45% (5/11). In those who had previously had genetic evaluation, with no diagnosis found, ONT LRS identified a cause in 39% (9/23). The high success rate in the latter group demonstrates the potential for LRS to greatly improve the rate of genetic diagnosis in these disorders.

Figure 3.
Figure 3. Overview of outcomes.

Flow chart provides a schematic overview of diagnostic outcomes across the study cohort, which included 34 genetically undiagnosed patients with spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders and five patients with known genetic diagnoses included as positive controls.

There are multiple explanations for the diagnostic uplift achieved by our LRS assay. STR expansions account for most diagnoses in the cohort (10/14, 71%). The most common diagnosis was SCA27B, identified in 7/34 (21%), whilst two individuals (6%) were identified to have RFC1-CANVAS. These two STR expansions were both only relatively recently identified44–46, and currently, testing in Australia is only offered on a research basis. Lack of access to clinical testing combined with the relatively high frequency of FGF14 and RFC1 STR expansions in patients with HCA underpins the high rate of detection of these two variants within our cohort. Another individual was diagnosed with SCA8, caused by an STR expansion in ATXN8/ATXN8OS47. While clinical testing is available, this is one of several rare STR expansions that are not incorporated into standard genetic testing pathways in all sites, so may be overlooked, as was the case for this individual. The ability to identify these unexpected diagnoses is an advantage of our integrated approach that captures all relevant STRs on every test. The remaining 4/14 (29%) of diagnoses were accounted for by conventional sequence variants (SNVs and indels). Notably, this includes a compound heterozygous variant in SPG7, which could not be phased using short-read NGS to confirm pathogenicity. The capacity of LRS to phase autosomal recessive or de novo variants or identify both an STR expansion and sequence variant in a compound heterozygous state (as can occur in RFC1-CANVAS/spectrum disorder and Friedreich ataxia35,48), is especially valuable for late-onset conditions, where availability of both parents for testing may otherwise be a barrier to diagnosis. Finally, one patient was diagnosed with SCA48 caused by a variant in STUB1, which was not recognised as pathogenic at the time of previous genetic evaluation due to the lack of recognition of dominant inheritance of this gene at the time of initial analysis49.

Pathogenicity of STR expansions may depend not only on repeat length, but on the repeat motif composition and the presence of interruptions. For example, RFC1-CANVAS/spectrum disorders are usually caused by biallelic (AAGGG)n STR expansions, but there are other pathogenic motifs, including (ACAGG)n, as well as several non-pathogenic motifs, including (AAAAG)n, (AAGAG)n, (AAAGGG)n and smaller (AAAGG)n expansions5. In such disorders, it is vital to obtain both repeat length and sequencing data, in order to confirm a diagnosis. Clinical testing may be undertaken with a combination of flanking PCR and repeat-primed PCR, which will identify specific common repeat motif(s), but will typically not detect the less common motifs, requiring further testing for such cases50,51. In contrast, LRS is able to detect and characterise the various repeat motif types, as well as repeat length in a single test. For example, patient 9, with RFC1-CANVAS, was identified to have both an (AAGGG)n and an (ACAGG)n expansion. Similarly, in another patient, we identified a BEAN1 STR expansion and were able to resolve the complex motif configuration; (TAAAA)50(TGGAA)226(TAAAA)120(TGGAA)110(TAAAA)75. Notably, this also reflects the first known case of European ancestry to harbour the pathogenic (TGGAA)n motif. Furthermore, several individuals were found to have non-pure GAA FGF14 STR expansions. In these cases, LRS provided the capacity to quantify the maximum pure GAA repeat length, which fell below the 250-repeat threshold for pathogenicity in all cases40. This highlights the strong utility of LRS for evaluation of STR expansions, being the only technique that can identify size, motif composition, zygosity, presence of interruptions, flanking variation and methylation status in a single assay16.

The ability to capture the full variety of genomic features potentially implicated in spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders in a single assay not only improves diagnostic yields but can greatly streamline the diagnostic pathway. In clinical practice, STR expansions are commonly evaluated with repeat-primed PCR and/or Southern blot, which require separate assays and/or specific primers/probes for each different gene16. In addition to requiring multiple sequential tests for some patients, this also incurs delays in the availability of clinical testing for newly described STR expansions as each new gene-specific assay must be developed and validated5. In contrast, new genes and/or STR targets can be added to an ONT adaptive sampling assay simply by updating the set of genome targets provided programmatically during sequencing, requiring no change to either the upstream laboratory processes or downstream bioinformatics analysis pipelines18. Therefore, ONT LRS facilitates adaptability and rapid addition of new genes as they are discovered. This was exemplified in our study, as during the project, two additional ataxia-associated STR expansions were identified; THAP11 (‘SCA51’)27,52 and ZFHX3 (recently identified as the basis of SCA4)28,29. Both genes were subsequently added to our gene panel. However, 24 samples had already undergone sequencing and were not evaluated for STR expansions in ZFHX3. Conversely, this also brings to light a limitation of targeted ONT LRS, which is the inability to reanalyse data for variants at additional ‘off-target’ loci, if new genes are discovered. This would be negated using whole-genome LRS, with either ONT or Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) technology but would come at an additional cost per patient.

Despite the described benefits of LRS, there remain several limitations and obstacles to clinical uptake of this technology. On a read-by-read level, accuracy for detecting single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions/deletions (indels) is lower than NGS53. Targeted ONT LRS can identify 98.8% of SNVs, although greater inaccuracy is seen in samples with reduced depth of coverage53. Detection of indels suffers from a greater level of inaccuracy, on account of an increased propensity for slippage errors.18 Software tools are less well-developed for data analysis, mapping and variant calling compared to NGS13. Due to the need for HMW DNA, freshly collected samples and specialized DNA extraction procedures are generally required13. Finally, the cost of LRS remains higher than short-read NGS, although pricing has, and is predicted to continue to improve13.

Beyond technology-related factors, other limitations of this study include potential selection bias. Patients were recruited from a tertiary centre, receiving referrals predominantly from primary care physicians and neurologists, with recruitment undertaken by authors L.I.R, D.Y. and K.R.K., neurologists, with subspecialty experience in neurogenetic disorders. The application of study protocols to broader neurology clinics could potentially impact the cohort characteristics and diagnostic rate. Most individuals in our cohort were of white/European background, and therefore results may differ when applied to broader population groups. Furthermore, although patients with features consistent with any spastic-ataxia spectrum disorder were eligible for the study, 29/34 (85%) had a primary HCA phenotype, whilst only two individuals had a primary HSP phenotype. This was likely contributed to by referral patterns, with several HCA patients referred to our research centre by local neurologists aware of this study, as well as the commencement of recruitment in late 2023 for a concurrent study, for which individuals with a primary HSP phenotype were eligible.

After undergoing genetic evaluation, many individuals with spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders remain without a genetic diagnosis, which has implications for clinical care. Provision of a genetic diagnosis may terminate a prolonged and arduous diagnostic odyssey, avoid further unnecessary and invasive investigations, permit disease-specific management and provide more accurate prognostic information. Although only few gene-specific treatments are presently available (e.g. treatment with 4-aminopyridine for SCA27B)39, eligibility for clinical trials may also be affected by a genetic diagnosis. Furthermore, there are important implications for reproductive choices and family counselling, with the ability to offer genetic testing in at-risk family members54. Evidently, there is clear impetus to improve current genetic testing methods, to close this diagnostic gap. Our study begins to address this gap through the development and evaluation of a targeted LRS strategy that accurately identifies all classes of genomic variation across a panel of genes implicated in spastic-ataxia spectrum disorders. This integrated ‘single test’ approach is now poised to replace fragmented genetic testing regimes, leading to improved diagnostic rates and streamlining the diagnostic pathway for patients.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Funding

This study was funded by Australian Medical Research Futures Fund grants MRF1173594 and MRF2023126 (to I.W.D.). The project receives partial in-kind support from Oxford Nanopore Technologies under an ongoing collaboration agreement.

Competing interests

The authors report no competing interests.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at online.

Acknowledgements

We thank our colleague David Pellerin for aiding in interpreting potential atypical cases of SCA27B. Kishore Raj Kumar receives funding from the Medical Research Future Fund (grants 2023126, 2023357, and 2024888) and from the Ainsworth 4 Foundation, unrelated to the current project.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Joint-senior authors.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Kang C, Liang C, Ahmad KE, et al. High Degree of Genetic Heterogeneity for Hereditary Cerebellar Ataxias in Australia. Cerebellum. 2019;18(1):137–146.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    Ruano L, Melo C, Silva MC, Coutinho P. The global epidemiology of hereditary ataxia and spastic paraplegia: a systematic review of prevalence studies. Neuroepidemiology. 2014;42(3):174–183.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Synofzik M, Schüle R. Overcoming the divide between ataxias and spastic paraplegias: Shared phenotypes, genes, and pathways. Mov Disord. 2017;32(3):332–345.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    Rudaks LI, Yeow D, Ng K, Deveson IW, Kennerson ML, Kumar KR. An Update on the Adult-Onset Hereditary Cerebellar Ataxias: Novel Genetic Causes and New Diagnostic Approaches. Cerebellum. 2024. doi:10.1007/s12311-024-01703-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. 5.↵
    Chintalaphani SR, Pineda SS, Deveson IW, Kumar KR. An update on the neurological short tandem repeat expansion disorders and the emergence of long-read sequencing diagnostics. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2021;9(1):98.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Saputra L, Kumar KR. Challenges and Controversies in the Genetic Diagnosis of Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021;21(4):15.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Coarelli G, Coutelier M, Durr A. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: new genes and progress towards treatments. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22(8):735–749.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    Bogdanova-Mihaylova P, Hebert J, Moran S, et al. Inherited Cerebellar Ataxias: 5-Year Experience of the Irish National Ataxia Clinic. Cerebellum. 2021;20(1):54–61.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.
    Balakrishnan S, Aggarwal S, Muthulakshmi M, et al. Clinical and Molecular Spectrum of Degenerative Cerebellar Ataxia: A Single Centre Study. Neurol India. 2022;70(3):934–942.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.
    Baviera-Muñoz R, Carretero-Vilarroig L, Vázquez-Costa JF, et al. Diagnostic Efficacy of Genetic Studies in a Series of Hereditary Cerebellar Ataxias in Eastern Spain. Neurol Genet. 2022;8(6):e200038.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.
    Kara E, Tucci A, Manzoni C, et al. Genetic and phenotypic characterization of complex hereditary spastic paraplegia. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 7):1904–1918.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Schüle R, Wiethoff S, Martus P, et al. Hereditary spastic paraplegia: Clinicogenetic lessons from 608 patients. Ann Neurol. 2016;79(4):646–658.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Mantere T, Kersten S, Hoischen A. Long-Read Sequencing Emerging in Medical Genetics. Front Genet. 2019;10:426.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Verdura E, Schlüter A, Fernández-Eulate G, et al. A deep intronic splice variant advises reexamination of presumably dominant SPG7 Cases. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020;7(1):105–111.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    Erdmann H, Schöberl F, Giurgiu M, et al. Parallel in-depth analysis of repeat expansions in ataxia patients by long-read sequencing. Brain. 2023;146(5):1831–1843.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    Stevanovski I, Chintalaphani SR, Gamaarachchi H, et al. Comprehensive genetic diagnosis of tandem repeat expansion disorders with programmable targeted nanopore sequencing. Sci Adv. 2022;8(9):eabm5386.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    Pellerin D, Del Gobbo GF, Couse M, et al. A common flanking variant is associated with enhanced stability of the FGF14-SCA27B repeat locus. Nat Genet. 2024;56(7):1366–1370.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Payne A, Holmes N, Clarke T, Munro R, Debebe BJ, Loose M. Readfish enables targeted nanopore sequencing of gigabase-sized genomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39(4):442–450.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. 19.↵
    Gamaarachchi H, Samarakoon H, Jenner SP, et al. Fast nanopore sequencing data analysis with SLOW5. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40(7):1026–1029.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    Samarakoon H, Ferguson JM, Gamaarachchi H, Deveson IW. Accelerated nanopore basecalling with SLOW5 data format. Bioinformatics. 2023;39(6): btad352.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(18):3094–3100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Zheng Z, Li S, Su J, Leung AWS, Lam TW, Luo R. Symphonizing pileup and full-alignment for deep learning-based long-read variant calling. Nat Comput Sci. 2022;2(12):797–803.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Martin M, Ebert P, Marschall T. Read-Based Phasing and Analysis of Phased Variants with WhatsHap. Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2590:127–138.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    Smolka M, Paulin LF, Grochowski CM, et al. Detection of mosaic and population-level structural variants with Sniffles2. Nat Biotechnol. 2024. doi:10.1038/s41587-023-02024-y
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, et al. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Geoffroy V, Herenger Y, Kress A, et al. AnnotSV: an integrated tool for structural variations annotation. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(20):3572–3574.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Tan D, Wei C, Chen Z, et al. CAG Repeat Expansion in THAP11 Is Associated with a Novel Spinocerebellar Ataxia. Mov Disord. 2023;38(7):1282–1293.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    Chen Z, Gustavsson EK, Macpherson H, et al. Adaptive Long-Read Sequencing Reveals GGC Repeat Expansion in ZFHX3 Associated with Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 4. Mov Disord. 2024;39(3):486–497.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Wallenius J, Kafantari E, Jhaveri E, et al. Exonic trinucleotide repeat expansions in ZFHX3 cause spinocerebellar ataxia type 4: A poly-glycine disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2024;111(1):82–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. 30.↵
    Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(1):24–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(5):540–546.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Edge P, Bansal V. Longshot enables accurate variant calling in diploid genomes from single-molecule long read sequencing. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4660.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Martin AR, Williams E, Foulger RE, et al. PanelApp crowdsources expert knowledge to establish consensus diagnostic gene panels. Nat Genet. 2019;51(11):1560–1565.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Nolin SL, Sah S, Glicksman A, et al. Fragile X AGG analysis provides new risk predictions for 45-69 repeat alleles. Am J Med Genet A. 2013;161A(4):771–778.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Benkirane M, Da Cunha D, Marelli C, et al. RFC1 nonsense and frameshift variants cause CANVAS: clues for an unsolved pathophysiology. Brain. 2022;145(11):3770–3775.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    Ronco R, Perini C, Currò R, et al. Truncating Variants in in Cerebellar Ataxia, Neuropathy, and Vestibular Areflexia Syndrome. Neurology. 2023;100(5):e543–e554.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  37. 37.↵
    Sato N, Amino T, Kobayashi K, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 31 is associated with “inserted” penta-nucleotide repeats containing (TGGAA)n. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;85(5):544–557.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    Ishikawa K. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 31 (SCA31). J Hum Genet. 2023;68(3):153–156.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    GAA-FGF14 disease: defining its frequency, molecular basis, and 4-aminopyridine response in a large downbeat nystagmus cohort. eBioMedicine. 2024;102:105076.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    Ouyang R, Wan L, Pellerin D, et al. The genetic landscape and phenotypic spectrum of GAA-FGF14 ataxia in China: a large cohort study. EBioMedicine. 2024;102:105077.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    Vucic S, Howells J, Trevillion L, Kiernan MC. Assessment of cortical excitability using threshold tracking techniques. Muscle Nerve. 2006;33(4):477–486.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    de Bot ST, Schelhaas HJ, Kamsteeg EJ, van de Warrenburg BPC. Hereditary spastic paraplegia caused by a mutation in the VCP gene. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 12):e223; author reply e224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    Magri S, Nanetti L, Gellera C, et al. Digenic inheritance of STUB1 variants and TBP polyglutamine expansions explains the incomplete penetrance of SCA17 and SCA48. Genet Med. 2022;24(1):29–40.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    Rafehi H, Read J, Szmulewicz DJ, et al. An intronic GAA repeat expansion in FGF14 causes the autosomal-dominant adult-onset ataxia SCA50/ATX-FGF14. Am J Hum Genet. 2023;110(1):105–119.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.
    Brais B, Pellerin D, Danzi MC. Deep intronic FGF14 GAA repeat expansion in late-onset cerebellar ataxia. reply. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(21):e70.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    Cortese A, Simone R, Sullivan R, et al. Biallelic expansion of an intronic repeat in RFC1 is a common cause of late-onset ataxia. Nat Genet. 2019;51(4):649–658.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Adam MP,
    2. Feldman J,
    3. Mirzaa GM
    Website. Cleary JD, Subramony SH, Ranum LPW. Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 8. 2001 Nov 27 [Updated 2021 Apr 22]. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2024. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1268/
  48. 48.↵
    Galea CA, Huq A, Lockhart PJ, et al. Compound heterozygous FXN mutations and clinical outcome in friedreich ataxia. Ann Neurol. 2016;79(3):485–495.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    Genis D, Ortega-Cubero S, San Nicolás H, et al. Heterozygous mutation causes familial ataxia with cognitive affective syndrome (SCA48). Neurology. 2018;91(21):e1988–e1998.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    Scriba CK, Beecroft SJ, Clayton JS, et al. A novel RFC1 repeat motif (ACAGG) in two Asia-Pacific CANVAS families. Brain. 2020;143(10):2904–2910.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    Davies K, Szmulewicz DJ, Corben LA, Delatycki M, Lockhart PJ. -Related Disease: Molecular and Clinical Insights. Neurol Genet. 2022;8(5):e200016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    Wei C, Chen Z, Tan D, Jiang H, Zhong N, Xiong H. Reply to: “THAP11 CAG Expansion Beyond Chinese-Ancestry Cohorts: An Examination of 1000 Genomes and UK Biobank.” Mov Disord. 2023;38(12):2322–2323.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.↵
    Nakamura W, Hirata M, Oda S, et al. Assessing the efficacy of target adaptive sampling long-read sequencing through hereditary cancer patient genomes. NPJ Genom Med. 2024;9(1):11.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.↵
    Yeow D, Rudaks LI, Siow SF, Davis RL, Kumar KR. Genetic Testing of Movements Disorders: A Review of Clinical Utility. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov. 2024;14:2.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Posted September 06, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Targeted long-read sequencing as a single assay improves diagnosis of spastic-ataxia disorders
Laura Ivete Rudaks, Igor Stevanovski, Dennis Yeow, Andre L. M. Reis, Sanjog R. Chintalaphani, Pak Leng Cheong, Hasindu Gamaarachchi, Lisa Worgan, Kate Ahmad, Michael Hayes, Andrew Hannaford, Samuel Kim, Victor S. C. Fung, Michael Halmagyi, Andrew Martin, David Manser, Michel Tchan, Karl Ng, Marina L. Kennerson, Ira W. Deveson, Kishore Raj Kumar
medRxiv 2024.09.04.24312938; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.04.24312938
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area