Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Australian medical research that considered sex as a biological variable: a meta-analysis

View ORCID ProfileJanelle Ryan, View ORCID ProfileShanie Landen, View ORCID ProfileVincent Harley
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.24310791
Janelle Ryan
1Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Janelle Ryan
Shanie Landen
1Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shanie Landen
Vincent Harley
1Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vincent Harley
  • For correspondence: vincent.harley{at}hudson.org.au
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Subjects in medical research have predominantly been male (1). Women experience 50-75% more adverse drug responses (2) resulting in withdrawn medications (3). While sex differences in metabolism, disease and treatment response are increasingly recognised, sex-informed medicine is lagging. In 2016, USAs National Institutes of Health (NIH) formulated the Sex as a Biological Variable policy (4), stating that grant recipients must consider sex in experimental design, planning, analysis and reporting of their findings. Australian data is lacking on the inclusion of both males and females as well as appropriate analysis of sex differences.

We analysed the 219 Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) research articles over 2019-2023 (Box 1). We tallied when; i) both males and females were included in the study, ii) sex differences were reported and/or considered, and iii) the analysis was appropriate to support sex-related claims.

We found that articles published in MJA are including males and females, however testing of sex differences is uncommon and appropriate statistical analysis is lacking. We hope that this article will bring attention to this fundamental issue and improve future efforts to investigate sex differences.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research received financial support from the National Health and Medical Research Council Program Grant 2002426 and Fellowship APP1154870 awarded to VH. Additional support was provided by the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship for JR. We also acknowledge funding through the Victorian Governments Operational Infrastructure Support Program.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

We used only published, openly available research articles that reported human data from the Medical Journal of Australia journal.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 23, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Australian medical research that considered sex as a biological variable: a meta-analysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Australian medical research that considered sex as a biological variable: a meta-analysis
Janelle Ryan, Shanie Landen, Vincent Harley
medRxiv 2024.08.23.24310791; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.24310791
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Australian medical research that considered sex as a biological variable: a meta-analysis
Janelle Ryan, Shanie Landen, Vincent Harley
medRxiv 2024.08.23.24310791; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.24310791

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (428)
  • Allergy and Immunology (753)
  • Anesthesia (220)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3286)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (362)
  • Dermatology (276)
  • Emergency Medicine (478)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1168)
  • Epidemiology (13349)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (898)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5140)
  • Geriatric Medicine (480)
  • Health Economics (781)
  • Health Informatics (3260)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1189)
  • Hematology (429)
  • HIV/AIDS (1015)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14618)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (912)
  • Medical Education (476)
  • Medical Ethics (126)
  • Nephrology (522)
  • Neurology (4914)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (725)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (880)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2517)
  • Ophthalmology (722)
  • Orthopedics (280)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (542)
  • Pediatrics (1299)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (549)
  • Primary Care Research (555)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4198)
  • Public and Global Health (7489)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1703)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1010)
  • Respiratory Medicine (979)
  • Rheumatology (479)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (496)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (547)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (235)
  • Urology (204)