Abstract
Radiology may better define tuberculosis (TB) severity and guide duration of treatment. We aimed to systematically study baseline chest X-rays (CXR) and their association with TB treatment outcome using real-world data. We used logistic regression to associate TB treatment outcomes with CXR findings, including percent of lung involved in disease (PLI), cavitation, and Timika score, alone or in combination with other clinical characteristics, stratifying by drug resistance status and HIV (n = 2,809). We fine-tuned convolutional neural nets (CNN) to automate PLI measurement from the CXR DICOM images (n = 5,261). PLI is the only CXR finding associated with unfavorable outcome across drug resistance and HIV subgroups [Rifampicin-susceptible disease without HIV, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1·11 (1·01, 1·22), P-value 0·025]. The most informed model of baseline characteristics tested predicts outcome with a validation mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0·769. PLI and Timika (AUC 0·656 and 0·655 respectively) predict unfavorable outcomes better than cavitary information (best AUC 0·591). The addition of PLI improves prediction compared to sex and age alone (AUC 0·680 and 0·627, respectively).PLI>25% provides a better separation of favorable and unfavorable outcomes compared to PLI>50%. The best performing ensemble of CNNs has an AUC 0·850 for PLI>25% and mean absolute error of 11·7% for the PLI value. PLI is better than cavitation for predicting unfavorable treatment outcome in pulmonary TB in non-clinical trial settings and it can be accurately and automatically predicted with CNNs.
One Sentence Summary The percent of lung involved in disease improves prediction of unfavorable outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis when added to clinical characteristics.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases / National Institutes of Health grant R01AI155765 (MF and KRJ). National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases / National Institutes of Health grant UM1 AI068634 (LH). This work was also supported in part with Federal funds from the NIAID, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services under BCBB Support Services Contract HHSN316201300006W/75N93022F00001 to Guidehouse, Inc, and under NIAID, NIH, Business and Science Data Analytics contract HHSN316201200018W to Deloitte Consulting LLP. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We used the automated tool provided by Harvard Medical School Ethics/IRB to confirm the work conducted is non-human subjects research
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at: https://tbportals.niaid.nih.gov/
