Abstract
Background Kenya is one of the African countries that have pledged to reduce neonatal death as per the World Health Organization set target by 2030. Providing high-quality newborn care is critical in minimizing neonatal mortality. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that influence the quality of newborn care in Kenya.
Methods Secondary data from 11,863 participants of the Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) 2022 were analyzed. The participants were chosen using a two-stage stratified sampling method. The quality of newborn care was operationalized as receiving all components of newborn care after childbirth, as reported by the mother. To identify the factors associated with the quality of newborn care, multivariable logistic regression was carried out using SPSS (version 20).
Results In this study, 32.7% (95% CI: 31.0-34.5) of the mothers reported that their newborns had received all components of quality neonatal care after childbirth. Mothers who subscribed to the Christian (3.60 (95%CI: 1.32-9.83) or Muslim faith (3.88 (95%CI: 1.29-11.67) compared with those from other faiths, were more likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care. Mothers who spent an average of one hour accessing the health facilities compared with those who spent less than half an hour were 1.33 (95%CI: 1.01-1.75) times more likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care. Mothers who gave birth in a non-government organization health facility were 30.37 (95%CI: 2.69-343.20) times more likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care compared with those who delivered from a faith-based organization.
On the contrary, in terms of regions, Mothers who lived in Nyanza, Eastern, and Rift Valley provinces compared with those who lived in the coastal regions were 0.53 (95%CI: 0.34-0.82), 0.61 (95%CI: 0.39-0.94), and 0.62 (95%CI: 0.41-0.93) times less likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care, respectively. Finally, mothers who gave birth through cesarean section were 0.44 (95%CI: 0.32-0.61) times less likely to report that their newborns had received quality newborn care than mothers who gave birth through spontaneous vaginal delivery.
Conclusion The study indicates about a third of the neonates (1 in 3) received quality newborn care. This study seems to suggest that facility-related and parental social factors are associated with receiving quality newborn care. Several stakeholders including health care providers may need to pay more attention to newborn babies whose mothers come from marginalized regions of the country, minority religious faith denominations, and those delivered by ceasearen section. Stakeholders should focus on strengthening collaborations with NGO health facilities and achieving universal health coverage to improve the quality of neonatal care. Also, the government could utilize minority faith denominations as an avenue for staging sensitization about quality neonatal health services.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study received no funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
MEASURE DHS surveys uphold high universal moral standards, and the study process adheres to relevant regulations. The ICF Institutional Review Board assessed and approved the protocol for the 2022 KDHS survey. Human participants provided written informed permission, as did legally designated representatives of minor participants. Board assessed and approved the protocol for the 2022 KDHS survey. Written informed consent was acquired from all participants or the legally appointed representatives of minor participants.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
This data is freely available upon request from the MEASURE DHS website (URL: https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm). However, the researchers in this study have no right to share this data set with the public. Those interested in the data set may obtain it with full permission from the MEASURE DHS (URL: https://www.dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm).