Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Enhancing Clinical Documentation Workflow with Ambient Artificial Intelligence: Clinician Perspectives on Work Burden, Burnout, and Job Satisfaction

Michael Albrecht, Denton Shanks, Tina Shah, Taina Hudson, Jeffrey Thompson, Tanya Filardi, Kelli Wright, Greg Ator, Timothy Ryan Smith
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.12.24311883
Michael Albrecht
1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: malbrecht{at}kumc.edu
Denton Shanks
2Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, KUMC, Kansas City, KS, USA
DO, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tina Shah
3Abridge, Philadelphia, PA, USA
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taina Hudson
4Department of Internal Medicine, KUMC, Kansas City, KS, USA
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Thompson
5Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, KUMC, Kansas City, KS, USA
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tanya Filardi
6Department of Neurosurgery, KUMC, Kansas City, KS, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelli Wright
7Information Technology Services, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, USA
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Greg Ator
8Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, KUMC, Kansas City, KS, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy Ryan Smith
9Department of Pediatrics, KUMC, Kansas City, KS, USA
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objective This study assessed the effects of an ambient artificial intelligence (AI) documentation platform on clinicians’ perceptions of documentation workflow.

Materials and Methods A pre- and post-implementation survey evaluated ambulatory clinician perceptions on impact of Abridge, an ambient AI documentation platform. Outcomes included clinical documentation burden, work after-hours, clinician burnout, work satisfaction, and patient access. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and proportional odds logistic regression to compare changes for concordant questions across pre- and post-surveys. Covariate analysis examined effect of specialty type and duration of use of the AI tool.

Results Survey response rates were 51.1% (94/181) pre-implementation and 75.9% (101/133) post-implementation. Clinician perception of ease of documentation workflow (OR = 6.91, 95% CI: 3.90 to 12.56, p<0.001) and in completing notes associated with usage of the AI tool (OR = 4.95, 95% CI: 2.87 to 8.69, p<0.001) was significantly improved. The majority of respondents agreed that the AI tool decreased documentation burden, decreased the time spent documenting outside clinical hours, reduced burnout risk, and increased job satisfaction, with 48% agreeing that an additional patient could be seen if needed. Clinician specialty type and number of days using the AI tool did not significantly affect survey responses.

Discussion Clinician experience and efficiency was dramatically improved with use of Abridge across a breadth of specialties.

Conclusion An ambient AI documentation platform had tremendous impact on improving clinician experience within a short time frame. Future studies should utilize validated instruments for clinician efficiency and burnout and compare impact across AI platforms.

Competing Interest Statement

The primary and senior authors have no competing interests. One of the authors (Tina Shah, MD, MPH) is Chief Clinical Officer for Abridge and assisted with the review and authorship of this manuscript.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The IRB of the University of Kansas Medical Center waived ethical approval for this work

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Authors list order of authors.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study that are not included in the manuscript are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 26, 2024.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Enhancing Clinical Documentation Workflow with Ambient Artificial Intelligence: Clinician Perspectives on Work Burden, Burnout, and Job Satisfaction
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Enhancing Clinical Documentation Workflow with Ambient Artificial Intelligence: Clinician Perspectives on Work Burden, Burnout, and Job Satisfaction
Michael Albrecht, Denton Shanks, Tina Shah, Taina Hudson, Jeffrey Thompson, Tanya Filardi, Kelli Wright, Greg Ator, Timothy Ryan Smith
medRxiv 2024.08.12.24311883; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.12.24311883
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Enhancing Clinical Documentation Workflow with Ambient Artificial Intelligence: Clinician Perspectives on Work Burden, Burnout, and Job Satisfaction
Michael Albrecht, Denton Shanks, Tina Shah, Taina Hudson, Jeffrey Thompson, Tanya Filardi, Kelli Wright, Greg Ator, Timothy Ryan Smith
medRxiv 2024.08.12.24311883; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.12.24311883

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (427)
  • Allergy and Immunology (753)
  • Anesthesia (220)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3281)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (362)
  • Dermatology (274)
  • Emergency Medicine (478)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1164)
  • Epidemiology (13340)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (896)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5130)
  • Geriatric Medicine (479)
  • Health Economics (781)
  • Health Informatics (3253)
  • Health Policy (1138)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1189)
  • Hematology (427)
  • HIV/AIDS (1014)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14612)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (910)
  • Medical Education (475)
  • Medical Ethics (126)
  • Nephrology (522)
  • Neurology (4900)
  • Nursing (261)
  • Nutrition (725)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (879)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2516)
  • Ophthalmology (722)
  • Orthopedics (280)
  • Otolaryngology (346)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (539)
  • Pediatrics (1297)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (548)
  • Primary Care Research (554)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4193)
  • Public and Global Health (7482)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1702)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1010)
  • Respiratory Medicine (979)
  • Rheumatology (478)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (495)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (545)
  • Toxicology (71)
  • Transplantation (235)
  • Urology (203)