Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology, particularly pretrained machine learning models, holds promise for overcoming image interpretation complexities and improving diagnostic accuracy. Although extensive research highlights their potential, challenges remain in adapting these models for generalizability across diverse medical image modalities, such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed Tomography (CT), and X-rays. Most importantly, limited generalizability across image modalities hinders their real-world application in diverse medical settings. This study addresses this gap by investigating the effectiveness of pretrained models in interpreting diverse medical images. We evaluated ten state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN) models, including ConvNeXtBase, EfficientNetB7, VGG architectures (VGG16, VGG19), and InceptionResNetV2, for their ability to classify multimodal medical images from brain MRI, kidney CT, and chest X-ray (CXR) scans. Our evaluation reveals VGG16’s superior generalizability across diverse modalities, achieving accuracies of 96% for brain MRI, 100% for kidney CT, and 95% for CXR. Conversely, EfficientNetB7 excelled in brain MRI with 96% accuracy but showed limited generalizability to kidney CT (56% accuracy) and CXR (33% accuracy), suggesting its potential specialization for MRI tasks. Future research should enhance the generalizability of pretrained models across diverse medical image modalities. This includes exploring hybrid models, advanced training techniques, and utilizing larger, more diverse datasets. Integrating multimodal information, such as combining imaging data with patient history, can further improve diagnostic accuracy. These efforts are crucial for deploying robust AI systems in real-world medical settings, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Centre of Excellence for Data Science, AI and Modelling, University of Hull, UK
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/amanullahasraf/covid19-pneumonia-normal-chest-xray-pa-dataset
https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/nazmul0087/ct-kidney-dataset-normal-cyst-tumor-and-stone
https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/navoneel/brain-mri-images-for-brain-tumor-detection