Abstract
Diagnosing eye and orbit pathologies through radiological imaging presents considerable challenges due to their low prevalence, the extensive range of possible conditions, and their variable presentations, necessitating substantial domain-specific expertise. This study evaluates whether a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) tool, combined with a curated database of orbital MRI cases with verified diagnoses, can enhance diagnostic accuracy and reduce reading time for radiologists diagnosing these pathologies. In a multi-reader, multi-case study involving 36 radiologists and 48 retrospective orbital MRI cases, participants diagnosed eight cases: four using conventional reference tools (e.g., Radiopaedia.org, StatDx) and four with the addition of the CBIR tool. Analysis using linear mixed-effects models revealed significant improvements in diagnostic accuracy when using the CBIR tool alone (55.88% vs. 70.59%, p = 0.03, odds ratio = 2.07) and an even greater improvement when used alongside conventional tools (55.88% vs. 83.33%, p = 0.02, odds ratio = 3.65). Reading time decreased when using the CBIR tool alone (334s vs. 236s, p < 0.001) but increased when used in conjunction with conventional tools (334s vs. 396s, p < 0.001). These findings indicate that CBIR tools can significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy for eye and orbit diagnostics, though their impact on reading time varies.
Competing Interest Statement
The software used in this study was developed for research purposes but may be commercially licensed in the future, which may benefit authors J.L.R., W.L, S.S., S.S.I and K.E.E. None of the other authors declare competing interests.
Funding Statement
K.E.E., W.L., S.S. and J.L.R. received funding from the Digital Health Accelerator of the Berlin Institute of Health. K.E.E. received support from Stiftung Charite. J.L.R. received support from the IFI program of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ethics Committee of Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin gave ethical approval for this work under ethics application number EA1/214/22 on January 11th, 2023.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We changed the abstract and the style of the tables, in addition we included the supplement.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
