Abstract
Background Diagnoses of eye and orbit pathologies by radiological imaging is challenging due to their low prevalence and the relative high number of possible pathologies and variability in presentation, thus requiring substantial domain-specific experience.
Purpose This study investigates whether a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) tool paired with a curated database of orbital MRI cases with verified diagnoses can enhance diagnostic accuracy and reduce reading time for radiologists across different experience levels.
Material and Methods We tested these two hypotheses in a multi-reader, multi-case study, with 36 readers and 48 retrospective eye and orbit MRI cases. We asked each reader to diagnose eight orbital MRI cases, four while having only status quo reference tools available (e.g. Radiopaedia.org, StatDx, etc.), and four while having a CBIR reference tool additionally available. Then, we analyzed and compared the results with linear mixed effects models, controlling for the cases and participants.
Results Overall, we found a strong positive effect on diagnostic accuracy when using the CBIR tool only as compared to using status quo tools only (status quo only 55.88%, CBIR only 70.59%, 26.32% relative improvement, p=.03, odds ratio=2.07), and an even stronger effect when using the CBIR tool in conjunction with status quo tools (status quo only 55.88%, CBIR + status quo 83.33%, 49% relative improvement, p=.02, odds ratio=3.65). Reading time in seconds (s) decreased when using only the CBIR tool (status quo only 334s, CBIR only 236s, 29% decrease, p<.001), but increased when used in conjunction with status quo tools (status quo only 334s, CBIR + status quo 396s, 19% increase, p<.001).
Conclusion We found significant positive effects on diagnostic accuracy and mixed effects on reading times when using the CBIR reference tool, indicating the potential benefits when using CBIR reference tools in diagnosing eye and orbit mass lesions by radiological imaging.
Summary Using a content-based image retrieval tool significantly improved diagnostic accuracy and had mixed effects on reading time for diagnosing MRI exams of patients with eye and orbit pathologies.
Key Results
Using the CBIR tool alone improved diagnostic accuracy from 55.88% to 70.59% (odds ratio=2.07, p=.03) and decreased reading time from 334s to 236s (p<.001) compared to SQ alone.
Using CBIR together with SQ tools further increased accuracy to 83.33% (odds ratio=3.65, p=.02) but increased reading time to 396s (p<.001) compared to SQ only.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
K.E.E., W.L., S.S. and J.L.R. received funding from the Digital Health Accelerator of the Berlin Institute of Health. K.E.E. received support from Stiftung Charite. J.L.R. received support from the IFI program of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Ethics Committee of Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin gave ethical approval for this work under ethics application number EA1/214/22 on January 11th, 2023.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
Abbreviations
- CBIR
- Content-based image retrieval
- SQ
- status quo reference tools (Radiopaedia.org, StatDx, etc.)
- ML
- machine learning
- ROI
- Region of Interest
- Infl. & Infect.
- Inflammatory and infectious diseases.
