Abstract
Background Motherhood can profoundly challenge individuals’ well-being. Social media and other digital platforms are promising modalities for reaching and supporting mothers with evidence-based psychoeducation and connection to peers. However, much is unknown about how mothers perceive these online peer communities and their impact on health and well-being.
Purpose To describe mothers’ perceptions of the impact of exposure to and engagement with a mom-centered digital community (Momwell) on their well-being.
Methods Pregnant persons and mothers exposed to Momwell psychoeducational content and community related to motherhood via social media, podcast, or blog completed an online survey (N=569). Participants reported several perceived changes related to competence, relatedness/connection, and autonomy in decision-making since joining the Momwell community by rating their agreement with a series of questions.
Results All but two participants identified as mothers; 45% were either pregnant or within 12 months postpartum. The majority agreed with statements about perceived changes in their lives, well-being, and feelings since joining the Momwell community (82-97%). All participants reported positive changes related to their sense of competence, 99% reported positive changes related to relatedness, and 97% reported positive changes related to autonomy.
Conclusion Exposure to psychoeducational content related to motherhood and maternal mental health and peer engagement within a mom-centered community can enhance maternal well-being through positive changes in competence, relatedness, and autonomy.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by a grant from the Daymark Foundation (PI: Waring).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The University of Connecticut Institutional Review Board (IRB) gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Most of the data presented in this paper are available online at OpenICPSR (https://doi.org/10.3886/E204321V3). All data presented in this paper are available upon reasonable request to the first author.
