ABSTRACT
Background Body Mass Index (BMI) is a widely used and accepted indicator of nutritional status in adults. Mid-Upper-Arm-Circumference (MUAC) is another anthropometric measure used primarily among children. While BMI remains the best indicator of nutritional status, it can sometimes be impractical because of logistical requirements for weight and height measurement, especially for large population-based studies and bed-ridden patients. Therefore, we analyzed anthropometric data collected from the Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit (MEIRU) Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) survey to determine the correlation between BMI and MUAC in the assessment of adult nutritional status in Malawi.
Methods A secondary data analysis utilizing descriptive and correlational statistical research methods was used to determine the relationship between BMI and MUAC in the assessment of adults’ nutritional status in Malawi. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 27. The independent t test and Chi-square were employed. Furthermore, the study included the Pearson correlation test to assess the relationship between variables. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results The study assessed 30,575 participants, of whom the majority (61.8%) were females. The mean MUAC was 27.2 (SD = 3.300), and the mean BMI was 23.5 (SD = 4.55). The study found a strong positive statistically significant correlation between MUAC and BMI among Malawians (r = 0.836, CI = (0.832-0.839) such that for each additional centimeter increase in MUAC, BMI is expected to increase by approximately 1.153 units (BMI = -7.797 + 1.153 (MUAC)). There was a significant positive correlation between BMI and MUAC in both males and females and in rural and urban residents (P<0.01). The ROC curve was excellent for BMI in the overweight range (AUC = 0.87), and the findings were superior in the obese range (AUC = 0.956).
Conclusion The correlation between MUAC and BMI is positive regardless of sex or rural/urban residence. Therefore, the MUAC can be used as a clinical test to predict BMI.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work received no funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used openly available human data originally located via this link https://doi.org/10.17037/DATA.00000961
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data availability
The data utilized for this study is freely accessible online and can be accessed via the following link https://doi.org/10.17037/DATA.00000961