Successful strategies that address gender-related barriers and promote bodily autonomy within efforts to scale up and sustain post-pregnancy contraception: A scoping review

1. Identifying the research question

We searched for evidence of addressing gender-related barriers and promoting bodily autonomy in successful strategies to scale up and sustain postpartum and post-abortion contraception. In the absence of other measures in most impact evaluations, we defined success according to the metrics defined for most interventions, that is, increased contraceptive uptake post-pregnancy, therefore, increasing access to sexual and reproductive health services.

2. Identifying relevant studies

We searched PubMed, EBSCOhost (Academic Search Complete), and EMBASE online databases. Search terms “in any field” included: ((postpartum contraception) OR (postpartum family planning) OR (post abortion contraception) OR (post abortion family planning) OR (prenatal contraception) OR (prenatal family planning) OR (antenatal contraception) OR (antenatal family planning)) AND ((gender barrier) OR (gender issues) OR (cultural issues)). We also searched the database SciSpace, asking: “What are successful strategies for expanding postpartum or post-abortion contraception?” We included implementation, evaluation, and experimental studies published in any language between 2013 and 2023. We excluded papers that did not meet these criteria. One researcher (AC) conducted all the searches and the following steps in October 2023.

3. Study selection

We refined the research strategy in a set of steps. First, we imported all the references to Endnote 20 and deleted duplicates. Second, we imported the remaining references to Covidence and conducted title and abstract screening. We removed publications that were either irrelevant, not found, abstract only, editorials, or letters. Third, we imported the full version of the remaining references plus additional references found through citation search to SciSpace and asked: “Does the paper identify successes to postpartum or post-abortion contraception?” If positive, we refined the search by asking two follow-up questions tested multiple times to capture as many eligible papers as possible: “Were any successes identified?” and “Was the intervention successful?” We excluded the papers that yielded a negative response. We selected the remaining papers for full review and classified them for full review according to the type of studies. We retained implementation, evaluation, and experimental studies and discarded reviews and observational studies. We assessed as eligible the publications that have successfully addressed barriers to the broad adoption and ongoing use of post-pregnancy contraceptive methods, emphasizing the reinforcement of bodily autonomy. One researcher (AC) collected and reviewed the data.

4. Charting the data

For each publication, we extracted information on the country where the research was conducted, the population studied, and the methodological design. We charted the data according to four themes:

1. The level of gender responsiveness. To determine the level of each study, we used WHO’s Gender Assessment Tool and Gender Responsive Assessment Scale (7) and additional considerations specific to sexual and reproductive health (2), shown in Box 1.

2. Characteristics of gender-responsive strategies that reported success in expanding post-pregnancy contraception, especially those for which impact evaluations have been conducted.

3. Key components of gender-transformative strategies that can be adapted to different contexts and/or scaled up.

4. Factors associated with using digital tools to promote post-pregnancy contraceptive use.

We used the acronyms shown in Box 2.

5. Patient and Public Involvement

There was no patient or public involvement in this study.

1. Level of gender responsiveness

In

Table 1, we present the 30 studies according to the level of gender responsiveness reported, starting with level 5, in chronological order of publication. Four studies reported gender-transformative strategies (level 5), 24 were gender-specific (level 4), and two were gender-sensitive (level 3). Therefore, none of the strategies hindered the achievement of reproductive health and rights. All the strategies included women and girls, and none were explicitly targeted at gender-diverse people capable of childbearing. Additional information for each study is available in Annex 1.

2. Characteristics of gender-responsive strategies that reported success in expanding post-pregnancy contraception

The studies that reported gender-transformative strategies successful in expanding post-pregnancy contraception (8-11) shared the goal of improving the quality of contraception counseling and service provision. These interventions were delivered in contexts of quality improvement strategies that integrated contraception services into the continuum of post-pregnancy care and that offered women continuous access to information. In Afghanistan (8), the intervention involved integrating FP into postpartum care using quality improvement approaches focused on improving the quality of counseling and turning the process user-centered. This included tailoring the counseling process to address each woman’s specific reproductive intentions and contraceptive needs, finding private spaces for PPFP counseling, and involving husbands and mothers-in-law in counseling. Follow-up calls from FP counselors clarified contraceptive methods and underscored essential FP messages. These enhanced approaches successfully integrated FP into postpartum care, resulting in more women receiving counseling on postpartum FP and acquiring their chosen method before leaving the hospital. The strategy addressed gender-based factors by involving husbands and mothers-in-law in FP counseling. Before the strategy, the implementation team had identified that husbands were not allowed in the maternity ward and that some women wanted to consult with their husbands or mothers-in-law before making their decision on contraception use. Creating private spaces for postpartum FP counseling where the husband or the mother-in-law could participate, in person or via mobile phone, was a gender-transformative approach that contributed to meeting women’s needs and a rise in joint decision-making on SRH needs.

In Chad, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Mali, and Pakistan (9), the choice of contraceptives among women of reproductive age and those receiving post-abortion care varied by country, with LARCs being more prevalent in specific regions and other methods like oral contraceptives and injectables being dominant in others. The study discussed the role of community norms related to gender and fertility in implementing FP services. It emphasized the importance of engaging men and women in discussions about rights, fertility, and contraception at the local level. The strategy also highlighted the role of religious leaders in promoting modern contraception, indicating an understanding of the gender dynamics within religious contexts. Improving FP accessibility and education in crisis-affected regions involved several components: a) facility assessments and stocking: conducting health facility assessments to identify infrastructure gaps, reviewing the presence and condition of basic needs, and reequipping facilities with essential supplies and equipment; b) competency-based training: providing comprehensive training to health care providers, using materials from Jhpiego and the Population Council; this includes both theoretical sessions and practical training; c) supervision and quality improvement: engaging with facility teams and community leaders to ensure a clean, efficient, and respectful environment and regular supervisory visits to assess clinic conditions, stock levels, and data consistency; d) supply chain management: ensuring a steady supply of contraceptive methods and related items by both procuring necessary items and working to strengthen supply chain management in collaboration with government systems; and e) community mobilization: raising awareness at the community level through various means such as radio, participatory theater, and group dialogues, and engaging religious leaders across faiths to raise awareness and ensure women’s rights to access health services. The key to community mobilization’s success was motivating and involving the entire community to recognize the advantages and possibilities in planning and spacing childbirth and facilitating access for women to utilize services.

In Ethiopia (10), the strategy consisted of a package of interventions for women seeking abortion care that promoted a rights-based approach to informed consent and decision-making. The strategy improved the quality of PAFP counseling, increased the contraceptive method mix, emphasized and prioritized respect for women’s reproductive autonomy in the provision of PAFP services, promoted youth-friendly services, ensured providers’ commitment to the sexual and reproductive rights of young women, promoted privacy and confidentiality during service delivery, and strengthened community outreach through health extension workers. These strategies resulted in an increase in postabortion choice of a contraceptive method and a greater proportion choosing the more effective, long-acting methods.

In Kenya (11), health providers were trained on abortion values clarification, attitude transformation, methods of uterine evacuation, management of abortion complications, and post-abortion contraception. Training and mentorship of providers on PAFP and youth-friendly services, along with community engagement and referrals, helped remove common barriers to care: a) the project addressed the issue of providers’ hesitation to counsel and administer LARCs to adolescent or youth users through training and mentoring; b) each facility had separate procedure rooms for conducting medical vacuum aspiration to ensure adequate space and user confidentiality; c) implemented training and mentorship programs for mid-level providers on safe abortion, post-abortion care, and post-abortion contraception, with a focus on youth-friendly services; d) implemented a quality assessment tool based on the WHO’s seven pillars of health systems strengthening and the structures and processes in place to support the domains of quality (safety, timeliness, effectiveness, efficiency, equity, and people-centeredness); e) created health facility registers to track post-abortion contraceptive uptake; f) monitored mentees’ clinical competencies through logbooks, tracking their proficiency in LARC insertion and removal and manual vacuum aspiration; g) monitored the increase in couple counseling for SRH, indicating a rise in joint decision-making on SRH needs; h) community engagement and referral activities to raise awareness and reduce the stigma associated with abortion and contraception; i) incorporation of strong SRH rights advocacy partners into the project to build networks and enhance access to contraception and safe abortion; j) prioritization of youth-led SRH rights advocacy groups in projects to empower young people to make informed decisions about their sexual and reproductive health; k) establishment of quality improvement teams at each facility to assess progress and address gaps, fostering a culture of quality and motivation; l) education of teachers on SRH rights, recognizing the impact of teachers on students’ contraceptive use; and m) implemented strategies to increase male involvement in SRH rights, including holding forums for men and mentoring male champions. The increase in couple counseling for SRH indicated a rising normalization of joint decision-making on SRH needs.

The gender-specific strategies (12-35) focused on informed contraceptive decision-making while recognizing the potential impact of gender dynamics on contraceptive use without actively challenging the underlying gender norms or power relations. The most common gender-specific strategies to expand post-pregnancy contraception included: a) enhancing provider-patient interactions through tailored, structured, or balanced counseling, such as in Nigeria (12), the United States (20, 28), Kenya (21), Tanzania (25); b) increasing the variety of contraceptive choices to better respond to women’s needs, such as in China (14) and Somalia (16); c) integrating contraceptive education with health services like antenatal visits, such as in Ethiopia where they used a modified Integrated Maternal and Child Health to record the woman’s method choice during those visits (23), Nepal (24, 27, 32), Spain (30), Ethiopia (31), Rwanda (33), and Malawi (34); right after admission for delivery services, such as in Tanzania (29); during infant vaccinations, such as in Rwanda (18), Ghana (19), and Nigeria (35); during the first year postpartum, such as in China (14); and other maternal and child health services, such as in the United States (20, 26); d) introducing competency-based training for healthcare providers, such as in Benin, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Niger, Senegal, and Togo (15), Somalia (16), Ghana (17); e) employing storytelling with relatable content, such as in Bangladesh (13) and Ghana (19) or showing informational videos in hospital waiting areas, such as in Sri Lanka (22) and Nepal (24). Community engagement, particularly involving religious and community leaders, was critical in addressing cultural and gender norms, as shown in Bangladesh (13), Benin, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Niger, Senegal, Togo (15), and Somalia (16).

Finally, the gender-sensitive strategies reported in one study conducted in the United States (36) and one in Tanzania and South Africa (37) were aimed at either increasing the uptake and choice of post-partum contraception through education and training of midwives, nurses, and non-specialist doctors on counseling and provision or by enhancing an existing nurse home visiting program. These studies did not address informed contraceptive decision-making nor how gender dynamics might be impacting women’s experiences with the program.

Among the studies reviewed, we did not find indicators that measure and evaluate gender-related barriers and promote bodily autonomy. Annex 1 shows a list of indicators based on the strategies that measure and evaluate the rights-based counseling and provision of post-pregnancy contraception.

3. Key components of gender-transformative strategies that can be adapted to different contexts or scaled up

Based on the four gender-transformative studies (8-11), Table 2 shows the multifaceted approach needed to successfully implement gender-transformative interventions in post-pregnancy contraception across different cultural and regional contexts. Details from all the studies are available in Annex 2.

4. Factors associated with using digital tools to promote post-pregnancy contraceptive use

Of the 30 studies included in the review, ten referred to the use of digital tools to promote post-pregnancy contraceptive use (15, 18, 23, 25-30, 32). Two studies conducted in Nepal and one in Spain reported that digital technology in healthcare improved service integration and facilitated the dissemination of contraceptive information (27, 30, 32). In Tanzania, mobile applications and digital counseling tools were instrumental in training healthcare workers, giving them access to the latest information and techniques to meet users’ needs effectively (25). Digital data collection and management systems enhanced the continuity and follow-up of women users of contraception. For example, in Benin, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Niger, Senegal, and Togo, digital tools helped identify PPIUD complications (15). In Ethiopia, digital health records helped improve service integration and continuity of care, track PPFP, and facilitate decision-making and timely adoption of contraceptives (23). In Spain, women received reminders to consult contraception information during pregnancy (30). In Nepal, community health workers used mobile applications to individualize the counseling based on women’s responses to the balanced counseling strategy questions and to follow up at subsequent visits on initiation, barriers to access, and continuation (32). Finally, tablets and software for data input were used to collect data in Rwanda (18), Tanzania (29), the United States (26, 28), Spain (30), and Nepal (32).