Abstract
Background Cervical cancer is one of the very few cancers where pre-cancer lasts many years before becoming invasive cancer providing an opportunity for detection and treatment. It is leading cause cancer death where less attention is given for screening programs in sub-Saharan Africa. For this satisfaction of cervical cancer screening have a role in increasing utilization and quality of service
Methods A facility based cross-sectional study design was used to assess client satisfaction and its associated factor towards cervical cancer screening. Data was collected from 397 samples using a face to face interview in women who take cervical screening test in the selected health facilities. Data was entered to Epi info version 4.6 and bivariable and multivariable logistic analysis was done using SPSS version 25 and p value <0.05 was considered to be significant factors associated with cervical cancer screening service
Result from 397 interviewed women, 59% (236) were satisfied with cervical cancer screening services. One-hundred fourty five (36.5%) women had good comprehensive knowledge of cervical cancer screening. Satisfaction with cervical cancer screening service was statistically associated with Being house wife (AOR= 0.42(0.19-0.95), who attend Primary and secondary secondary (AOR =0.35(0.12-0.99) waiting time 31-60 min (AOR=0.14(0.06-0.33) and who went 1-5 km to the facility (AOR=0.41(0.19-0.90)
Conclusion The study findings indicated that greater than half of women were satisfied with cervical cancer screening service in North wollo public hospitals. Less than half of women had good knowledge about cervical cancer. The study revealed occupational status, educational status, waiting time, and distance to the facility were found to be significantly associated with cervical cancer screening satisfaction
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical clearance was obtained from ethical review committee of Wollo University College of Medicine and Health Science
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
NO
