ABSTRACT
Social affective and communication symptoms stand at the center of autism, and usually become apparent within the first 1-3 years of life. Symptom severity differs widely across toddlers and clinical outcomes, ranging from near-neurotypical to poor. The biological bases of this early and wide symptom diversity are largely unknown. While more than two dozen studies have attempted to subgroup early-age clinical heterogeneity, most studies fail to rigorously validate discovered subtypes using multiple methods, and none linked observed clinical subtypes with underlying functional neural signatures. Using a well-established approach for precision medicine patient subtyping (Similarity Network Fusion) and multiple rigorous validation methods, we integrated thoroughly replicated measures of social neurofunctional activation and social and language ability in 137 toddlers at early ages. Results identified three distinct social neural-clinical ASD subtypes, validated using multiple methods. One subtype was consistent with a ‘profound’ autism profile with negligible social neural activation, severe social and language symptoms, low social interest, and little clinical improvement. Another ASD subtype had a contrasting pattern with only mildly reduced social neural activity, near neurotypical social and language abilities, and substantial age-related clinical improvement. One principal implication of these results is that the “spectrum” of ASD heterogeneity is not truly a continuous spectrum from the neurobiological and clinical perspective. The profound autism subtype is the neurofunctional, clinical and developmental opposite of the mild ASD subtype, suggesting different etiological mechanisms. A second implication is that neurobiological and clinical subtype differences highlight the need to develop subtype-specific treatments, particularly for the profound subtype. Third, treatment studies with an undetermined mix of subtypes could fail or succeed based on how many patients from each subtype are included in the mix.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by NIDCD grant R01DC016385 awarded to Eric Courchesne and Karen Pierce; NIMH grants R01MH118879 and R01MH104446 awarded to Karen Pierce.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of the University of California, San Diego gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
