ABSTRACT
Background The global aging population underscores a critical need to tackle accompanying health and economic challenges, at all levels of society. This All-of-Society approach emphasizes the involvement of various stakeholders—governments, NGOs, researcher centers, private companies, local communities, and opinion leaders—to collectively promote healthy aging. However, how stakeholders enable healthy longevity remains unclear.
Objective This study examines how global stakeholders (governments, NGOs, researcher centers, private companies, local communities, and opinion leaders) create value towards healthy longevity. We identify the healthy longevity dimension of stakeholders’ value propositions and examine alignment between their propositions as an indicator of shared goals.
Methods Following the All-of-Society approach, we analyzed the healthy longevity aspects of value propositions among the six classes of stakeholders (N=128). We (1) employed semantic topic modeling to identify the primary value proposition topics as related to healthy longevity and (2) computed proposition alignment using similarity networks.
Results Our analysis revealed varying degrees of alignment between stakeholders’ healthy longevity propositions, with the lowest alignment observed for local communities and researcher centers.
Conclusions Findings underscore a key need to strengthen synergies between academic and community-based initiatives to promote translational science and highlight opportunities for strategic partnerships in the evolving healthy longevity field.
What is already known on this topic The National Academy of Medicine’s All-of-Society approach advocates for multi-stakeholder engagement towards healthy longevity, but specific stakeholder contributions, and their alignment toward shared goals, are poorly understood.
What this study adds To our knowledge, this study is the first to provide empirical evidence into the value propositions of healthy longevity stakeholders on a societal scale. It highlights key areas where multi-stakeholder collaboration can be strengthened—particularly between academic and local community initiatives—and proposes five strategies to strengthen collaboration.
How this study might affect research, practice, or policy Prioritizing (1) community-based participatory research, (2) translating healthy aging-related research findings into accessible resources, (3) prioritizing equity in intervention delivery, (4) establishing community advisory boards, and (5) developing knowledge translation and training programs, could potentially better align academic and community efforts towards more aligned, equitable and effective healthy longevity initiatives.
Competing Interest Statement
WM, OFG, EF, TK and MJ are affiliated with the Centre for Digital Health Interventions, a joint initiative of the Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, the Department of Management, Technology, and Economics at ETH Zurich, and the Institute of Technology Management and School of Medicine at the University of St.Gallen. CDHI is funded in part by CSS, a Swiss health insurer and MavieNext (UNIQA), an Austrian healthcare provider, and MTIP, a Swiss investor company. EF and TK are also a co-founder of Pathmate Technologies, a university spin-off company that creates and delivers digital clinical pathways. However, neither CSS nor Pathmate Technologies, MavieNext or MTIP were involved in the design, analysis, or writing of this research.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
