Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods

Jiayi Gao, Yuying Lu, View ORCID ProfileNegin Ashrafi, View ORCID ProfileIan Domingo, Kamiar Alaei, Maryam Pishgar
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.14.24304184
Jiayi Gao
1Department of Industrial System Engineering, University of Southern California,3715 McClintock Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90089
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuying Lu
1Department of Industrial System Engineering, University of Southern California,3715 McClintock Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90089
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Negin Ashrafi
1Department of Industrial System Engineering, University of Southern California,3715 McClintock Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90089
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Negin Ashrafi
Ian Domingo
2Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Inner Ring Rd, Irvine, CA 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ian Domingo
Kamiar Alaei
3Department of Health Science California State University, Long Beach,1250 Bellflower Blvd. HHS2-117 Long Beach, CA 90840
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maryam Pishgar
1Department of Industrial System Engineering, University of Southern California,3715 McClintock Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90089
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pishgar{at}usc.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Problem Sepsis, a life-threatening condition, accounts for the deaths of millions of people worldwide. Accurate prediction of sepsis outcomes is crucial for effective treatment and management. Previous studies have utilized machine learning for prognosis, but have limitations in feature sets and model interpretability.

Aim This study aims to develop a machine learning model that enhances prediction accuracy for sepsis outcomes using a reduced set of features, thereby addressing the limitations of previous studies and enhancing model interpretability.

Methods This study analyzes intensive care patient outcomes using the MIMIC-IV database, focusing on adult sepsis cases. Employing the latest data extraction tools, such as Google Big- Query, and following stringent selection criteria, we selected 38 features in this study. This selection is also informed by a comprehensive literature review and clinical expertise. Data preprocessing included handling missing values, regrouping categorical variables, and using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) to balance the data. We evaluated several machine learning models: Decision Trees, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, LightGBM, Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forest. The Sequential Halving and Classification (SHAC) algorithm was used for hyperparameter tuning, and both train-test split and cross-validation methodologies were employed for performance and computational efficiency.

Results The Random Forest model was the most effective, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.94 with a confidence interval of ±0.01. This significantly outperformed other models and set a new benchmark in the literature. The model also provided detailed insights into the importance of various clinical features, with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and average urine output being highly predictive. SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis further enhanced the model’s interpretability, offering a clearer understanding of feature impacts.

Conclusion This study demonstrates significant improvements in predicting sepsis outcomes using a Random Forest model, supported by advanced machine learning techniques and thorough data preprocessing. Our approach provided detailed insights into the key clinical features impacting sepsis mortality, making the model both highly accurate and interpretable. By enhancing the model’s practical utility in clinical settings, we offer a valuable tool for healthcare professionals to make data-driven decisions, ultimately aiming to minimize sepsis-induced fatalities.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The raw dataset is available in the MIMIC-IV repository:https://physionet.org/content/mimiciv/2.2/

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Abstract, Background, Discussion, and Conclusion updated. Author section updated. Figure 1 revised.

Data Availability

https://github.com/yuyinglu2000/Sepsis-Mortality.git

https://github.com/yuyinglu2000/Sepsis-Mortality.git

https://physionet.org/content/mimiciv/2.2/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 26, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods
Jiayi Gao, Yuying Lu, Negin Ashrafi, Ian Domingo, Kamiar Alaei, Maryam Pishgar
medRxiv 2024.03.14.24304184; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.14.24304184
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods
Jiayi Gao, Yuying Lu, Negin Ashrafi, Ian Domingo, Kamiar Alaei, Maryam Pishgar
medRxiv 2024.03.14.24304184; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.14.24304184

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3298)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (365)
  • Dermatology (280)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1173)
  • Epidemiology (13383)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5157)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3273)
  • Health Policy (1143)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1193)
  • Hematology (432)
  • HIV/AIDS (1019)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14636)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (478)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (525)
  • Neurology (4930)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (885)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (727)
  • Orthopedics (282)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (544)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (551)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4218)
  • Public and Global Health (7511)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1708)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1016)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (498)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (549)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)