Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Development and Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Cardiotocography Interpretation

Nicole Chiou, Nichole Young-Lin, Christopher Kelly, Julie Cattiau, Tiya Tiyasirichokchai, Abdoulaye Diack, Sanmi Koyejo, Katherine Heller, View ORCID ProfileMercy Asiedu
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.05.24303805
Nicole Chiou
1Stanford University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nichole Young-Lin
2Google Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Kelly
2Google Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Cattiau
2Google Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tiya Tiyasirichokchai
2Google Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abdoulaye Diack
2Google Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanmi Koyejo
3Google DeepMind
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine Heller
2Google Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mercy Asiedu
2Google Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mercy Asiedu
  • For correspondence: masiedu{at}google.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The inherent variability in the visual interpretation of cardiotocograms (CTGs) by obstetric clinical experts, both intra- and inter-observer, presents a substantial challenge in obstetric care. In response, we investigate automated CTG interpretation as a potential solution to enhance the early detection of fetal hypoxia during labor, which has the potential to reduce unnecessary operative interventions and improve overall maternal and neonatal care. This study employs deep learning techniques to reduce the subjectivity associated with visual CTG interpretation. Our results demonstrate that using objective umbilical cord blood pH outcome measurements, rather than clinician-defined Apgar scores, yields more consistent and robust model performance. Additionally, through a series of ablation studies, we explore the impact of temporal distribution shifts on the performance of these deep learning models. We examine tradeoffs between performance and fairness, specifically evaluating performance across demographic and clinical subgroups. Finally, we discuss the practical implications of our findings for the real-world deployment of such systems, emphasizing their potential utility in medical settings with limited resources.

Competing Interest Statement

All authors except N.C. are currently employed by Google, a for-profit entity which may stand to benefit financially from the models developed and presented in the paper. Authors have no other competing interests

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Google Research

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study used (or will use) ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at CTU-CHB Intrapartum Cardiotocography Database on Physionet: https://physionet.org/content/ctu-uhb-ctgdb/1.0.0/

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • nicchiou{at}cs.stanford.edu

  • nyounglin{at}google.com

  • kellych{at}google.com

  • juliecattiau{at}google.com

  • tiyat{at}google.com

  • diack{at}google.com

  • sanmik{at}google.com

  • kheller{at}google.com

  • ↵† Work done as a Student Researcher at Google

Data Availability

We used an open source dataset found at: https://physionet.org/content/ctu-uhb-ctgdb/1.0.0/ All additional data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

https://physionet.org/content/ctu-uhb-ctgdb/1.0.0/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 06, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development and Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Cardiotocography Interpretation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Development and Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Cardiotocography Interpretation
Nicole Chiou, Nichole Young-Lin, Christopher Kelly, Julie Cattiau, Tiya Tiyasirichokchai, Abdoulaye Diack, Sanmi Koyejo, Katherine Heller, Mercy Asiedu
medRxiv 2024.03.05.24303805; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.05.24303805
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Development and Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Cardiotocography Interpretation
Nicole Chiou, Nichole Young-Lin, Christopher Kelly, Julie Cattiau, Tiya Tiyasirichokchai, Abdoulaye Diack, Sanmi Koyejo, Katherine Heller, Mercy Asiedu
medRxiv 2024.03.05.24303805; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.05.24303805

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (428)
  • Allergy and Immunology (753)
  • Anesthesia (220)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3286)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (362)
  • Dermatology (276)
  • Emergency Medicine (478)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1168)
  • Epidemiology (13348)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (898)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5139)
  • Geriatric Medicine (480)
  • Health Economics (781)
  • Health Informatics (3260)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1189)
  • Hematology (429)
  • HIV/AIDS (1015)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14618)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (912)
  • Medical Education (476)
  • Medical Ethics (126)
  • Nephrology (522)
  • Neurology (4913)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (725)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (880)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2517)
  • Ophthalmology (722)
  • Orthopedics (280)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (542)
  • Pediatrics (1299)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (549)
  • Primary Care Research (555)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4198)
  • Public and Global Health (7489)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1703)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1010)
  • Respiratory Medicine (979)
  • Rheumatology (479)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (496)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (547)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (235)
  • Urology (204)